Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 576

../


Statement. Let QkQ_k be the kk-dimensional hypercube graph (so that QkQ_k has 2k2^k vertices and k2k−1k2^{k-1} edges). Determine the behaviour of

ex(n;Qk).\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_k).

Formulation. Erdős first conjectured that the cube has ex(n;Q3)≫n5/3\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_3)\gg n^{5/3}, matching the upper bound cn5/3cn^{5/3} he had for it, and that conjecture is false: Erdős and Simonovits record it and refute it by their display (5), ex(n;Q3)=O(n8/5)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_3)=O(n^{8/5}) ([ErSi70], p. 378, quoted under Current assessment). His later printed question, whether 8/58/5 is the exponent for the cube, is open. The Statement is the site's wording as of 2026-09-18 (page last edited 18 January 2026). ex(n;Qk)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_k) is the largest number of edges of a graph on nn vertices with no subgraph isomorphic to QkQ_k; the question is asked for each fixed kk as n→∞n\to\infty, and the request to determine the behavior asks for the order of magnitude, the exponent first. Q2=C4Q_2=C_4 is Problem 765; the site's commentary concerns k≥3k\ge3 and Q3Q_3 in particular, and Erdős's own printed forms of the question are narrower: whether ex(n;Q3)≫n8/5\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_3)\gg n^{8/5} ([Er81], Part III, item 2, display (2)), whether the bound cn8/5cn^{8/5} "is best possible" ([Er74c], p. 78; [Er75], Chapter 2). On the site's lower bound: the site writes (12+o(1))n3/2≤ex(n;Q3)(\tfrac12+o(1))n^{3/2}\le\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_3) as proved in [ErSi70]; that paper proves the two-sided bound of order n3/2n^{3/2} for the cube minus an edge (display (4)) and quotes f(n;K(2,2))=(1+o(1))n3/2/2f(n;K(2,2))=(1+o(1))n^{3/2}/2 (display (2), attributed to Brown and to Erdős, Rényi and Sós), and since C4=K(2,2)C_4=K(2,2) is a subgraph of Q3Q_3, every C4C_4-free graph is Q3Q_3-free; the site's lower bound is this containment applied to the C4C_4 asymptotic of Problem 765, not a separate theorem of the paper, as Janzer and Sudakov also say (p. 1: it "follows from the observation that Q3Q_3 contains a 4-cycle").

Status. Open. For the cube, $(\tfrac12+o(1))n^{3/2}\le\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_3)\le O(n^{8/5})$, the upper bound being display (5) of Erdős and Simonovits (1970) and unimproved since, the lower bound the 4-cycle bound; Erdős's original guess that n5/3n^{5/3} is the order is refuted by the upper bound. For k≥3k\ge3 in general, ex(n;Qk)=Ok(n2−1k−1+1(k−1)2k−1)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_k)=O_k(n^{2-\frac1{k-1}+\frac1{(k-1)2^{k-1}}}) (Janzer and Sudakov, Theorem 1.4; Forum of Mathematics, Sigma 2024, refereed), the first power improvement over the dependent-random-choice bound O(n2−1/k)O(n^{2-1/k}) and over the o(n2−1/k)o(n^{2-1/k}) they attribute to Sudakov and Tomon, against the lower bound Ω(n2−2k−2k2k−1−1)≥Ω(n2−2/k)\Omega(n^{2-\frac{2^k-2}{k2^{k-1}-1}})\ge\Omega(n^{2-2/k}) from the deletion method (their p. 17); for k=3k=3 their exponent 13/813/8 exceeds 8/58/5, so the 1970 bound stands for the cube. No source cited here determines the exponent for any k≥3k\ge3, and none was found in the search whose scope the Current assessment records. This is a bounded negative finding, not a certificate of openness.

Source. erdosproblems.com/576, accessed 2026-09-18: the problem page (OPEN, the site's label for a problem that is open and admits no finite computation; last edited 18 January 2026), its empty discussion thread and its empty proof-claim tab. The site cites [Er64c], [ErSi70, p. 378], [Er74c, p. 78], [Er75], [Er81] and [Er93, p. 334] as the problem's sources and [SuTo22] and [JaSu22] in its commentary; it points to Problem 1035 and lists the problem at number 52 of its extremal graph theory collection. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #576, https://www.erdosproblems.com/576, accessed 2026-09-18.

References.

  • [ErSi70] Erdős, P. and Simonovits, M., Some extremal problems in graph theory. Combinatorial theory and its applications, I (Proc. Colloq., Balatonfüred, 1969), North-Holland (1970), 377--390; displays (4) and (5), p. 378; (10), p. 379. Library home: erdos_1970_extremal_problems_graph_theory; paged at equation_5 and equation_4.
  • [JaSu22] Janzer, O. and Sudakov, B., On the Turán number of the hypercube. arXiv:2211.02015v3 (22 January 2024); Forum of Mathematics, Sigma 12 (2024), doi:10.1017/fms.2024.27 (published online 15 March 2024; the journal text was not consulted). Theorems 1.2, 1.4 and 1.5 and the lower bound are cited from arXiv v3, p. 2 and p. 17. Library home: janzer_2022_turan_number_hypercube; paged at theorem_1_4 and theorem_1_2.
  • [SuTo22] Sudakov, Benny and Tomon, István, The extremal number of tight cycles. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2022, no. 13, 9663--9684; doi:10.1093/imrn/rnaa396 (published online 8 February 2021). Its arXiv:2009.00528v1 (1 September 2020) contains no statement about the Turán number ex(n;Qk)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_k) of the hypercube or about Kd,dK_{d,d}-free bipartite graphs (the hypercube appears only as a host graph in its concluding remarks, p. 15, after Conjecture 7.1, with reference [3]); the bound the site attributes to this paper is cited here only as Theorem 1.2 of [JaSu22]. Library home: sudakov_2022_extremal_number_tight_cycles.
  • [Er74c] Erdős, Paul, Extremal problems on graphs and hypergraphs. Hypergraph Seminar, Lecture Notes in Math. 411 (1974), 75--84; display (7), p. 78. Library home: erdos_1974_extremal_problems_graphs_hypergraphs; paged at equation_7.
  • [Er81] Erdős, P., On the combinatorial problems which I would most like to see solved. Combinatorica 1 (1981), 25--42; Part III, item 2, displays (1)--(3). Library home: erdos_1981_combinatorial_problems_which_i_would_most. The version cited is a retyped one without the journal's pagination; the passage is on its pp. 6--7.
  • [Er64c] Erdős, P., Extremal problems in graph theory. Theory of Graphs and its Applications (Proc. Sympos. Smolenice, 1963), Prague (1964), 29--36; p. 35. Library home: erdos_1964_extremal_problems_graph_theory; paged at problem_p35.
  • [Er75] Erdős, P., Some recent progress on extremal problems in graph theory. Congr. Numer. XIV (1975), 3--14; Chapter 2, display (1), printed p. 8. Library home: erdos_1975_recent_progress_extremal_problems_graph_theory; paged at problem_p8.
  • [Er93] Erdős, Paul, Some of my favorite solved and unsolved problems in graph theory. Quaestiones Math. 16 (1993), 333--350; the site cites p. 334. Chapter I, display (3), T(n;G)<cn8/5T(n;G)<cn^{8/5} for the cube, with the conjecture that the exponent is sharp, printed p. 334 (the passage is quoted under Erdős's statements). Library home: erdos_1993_my_favorite_solved_unsolved_problems_graph_theory.
  • [Ch97] Chung, F. R. K., Open problems of Paul Erdős in graph theory. J. Graph Theory 25 (1997), 3--36; Problem (36), p. 9 of the author's preprint version. Not cited by the site. Library home: chung_1997_open_problems_paul_erdos_graph_theory; paged at problem_36.

Formalization. None. No file ErdosProblems/576.lean exists in formal-conjectures at main; the site's page shows the statement as not formalized ("No (create one)"), and the community database (teorth/erdosproblems, data/problems.yaml) records the problem as open (last update 31 August 2025), not formalized, no formal proof.

Current assessment

The question (site formulation of 2026-09-18). The statement above; OPEN, last edited 18 January 2026, no comments, no proof claims. The site's commentary attributes to Erdős and Simonovits [ErSi70] the cube bounds, lower of order n3/2n^{3/2} with constant 12\tfrac12 and upper O(n8/5)O(n^{8/5}), together with the remark that Erdős's first guess had been order n5/3n^{5/3}, and the order n3/2n^{3/2} for the cube minus an edge; it records that Erdős returned to the question of whether n8/5n^{8/5} is the order of ex(n;Q3)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_3) in [Er74c], [Er81] and [Er93]; for general kk it attributes ex(n;Qk)=o(n2−1k)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_k)=o(n^{2-\frac1k}) to a consequence of a theorem of Sudakov and Tomon [SuTo22] and the upper bound Ok(n2−1k−1+1(k−1)2k−1)O_k(n^{2-\frac1{k-1}+\frac1{(k-1)2^{k-1}}}) to Janzer and Sudakov [JaSu22]; and it points to Problem 1035. The community database record says open.

The cube: the bounds of 1970. Display (5) of [ErSi70] (p. 378; C={K(4,4)−4}C=\{K(4,4)-4\} "is the graph formed by the vertices and edges of a cube", p. 377): "Erdős conjectured that n5/3n^{5/3} is also the lower bound for CC, but this conjecture is false. In fact, (5) f(n;C)≤O(n8/5)f(n;C)\le O(n^{8/5})", preceded by "A very special case of a result of Erdős gives [3] f(n;C)<cn5/3f(n;C)<cn^{5/3}"; display (10) (p. 379) generalizes it to f(n;{K(r,r)−3})=O(n2−2/(2r−3))f(n;\{K(r,r)-3\})=O(n^{2-2/(2r-3)}). Display (4): c3n3/2<f(n;{C−1})<c4n3/2c_3n^{3/2}<f(n;\{C-1\})<c_4n^{3/2} for the cube minus an edge, strengthening Erdős's earlier c1n3/2<f(n;{C}−{x})<c2n3/2c_1n^{3/2}<f(n;\{C\}-\{x\})<c_2n^{3/2} for the cube minus a vertex. The lower bound for CC itself is the 4-cycle bound through display (2), as the Formulation paragraph says: ex(n;Q3)≥ex(n;C4)=(12+o(1))n3/2\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_3)\ge\mathrm{ex}(n;C_4)=(\tfrac12+o(1))n^{3/2}. Proof coverage: claims checked; the proofs (Theorems 1--2 and the graphs E(t,k,l)E(t,k,l)) are unverified. Janzer and Sudakov (p. 1, 2024) confirm the state: the 1970 bound "is still the the [sic] best known upper bound for this problem", the lower bound Ω(n3/2)\Omega(n^{3/2}) "follows from the observation that Q3Q_3 contains a 4-cycle", and "Any improvement on these long-standing bounds would be considered a major breakthrough." Chung's 1997 survey (Problem (36)) recorded the same two bounds; nothing has moved for the cube since 1970.

Higher cubes: the bounds map. The general upper bound ex(n;Qk)=O(n2−1/k)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_k)=O(n^{2-1/k}) follows from Füredi's and from Alon, Krivelevich and Sudakov's results for bipartite graphs with maximum degree kk on one side ([JaSu22], p. 2; the latter paper is carded under Problem 146). Theorem 1.2 of [JaSu22], attributed to Sudakov and Tomon: for a Kd,dK_{d,d}-free bipartite HH with maximum degree at most dd on one side, ex(n,H)=o(n2−1/d)\mathrm{ex}(n,H)=o(n^{2-1/d}), whence ex(n,Qd)=o(n2−1/d)\mathrm{ex}(n,Q_d)=o(n^{2-1/d}) for d≥3d\ge3, the site's [SuTo22] display; this is an attributed restatement: the arXiv v1 of the Sudakov--Tomon paper contains no such statement, and the published IMRN version, which differs from it, was not consulted. The statement, with tt for dd, is the result announced in the arXiv abstract of Sudakov and Tomon's Turán number of bipartite graphs with no Kt,tK_{t,t} (arXiv:1910.11048; Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 148 (2020), no. 7, 2811--2818, doi:10.1090/proc/15042), a different paper from [SuTo22]; only its abstract was read. Theorem 1.4 (p. 2): for any integer d≥3d\ge3, ex(n,Qd)=Od(n2−1d−1+1(d−1)2d−1)\mathrm{ex}(n,Q_d)=O_d\bigl(n^{2-\frac1{d-1}+\frac1{(d-1)2^{d-1}}}\bigr), the site's [JaSu22] display, answering Question 1.3 (Liu). Acceptance evidence: Forum of Mathematics, Sigma is refereed; arXiv v3 thanks "the two referees". Proof coverage: claims checked; the proof (Sections 2.1--2.3, pp. 3--11) is unverified. The other side (their p. 17): "for a general value of dd, the best known lower bound is ex(n,Qd)=Ω(n2−2d−2d2d−1−1)≥Ω(n2−2/d)\mathrm{ex}(n,Q_d)=\Omega\bigl(n^{2-\frac{2^d-2}{d2^{d-1}-1}}\bigr)\ge\Omega(n^{2-2/d}), coming from the probabilistic deletion method." So for k=4k=4 the exponent lies in [2−1431,4124][2-\tfrac{14}{31},\tfrac{41}{24}], about [1.548,1.708][1.548,1.708], and for k=3k=3 Theorem 1.4 gives 13/8=1.625>8/513/8=1.625>8/5, so it does not improve the cube; Theorem 1.5 (p. 2) adds supersaturation at the same density. The exponent is not determined for any k≥3k\ge3; the general conjecture that ex(n;G)/nα\mathrm{ex}(n;G)/n^\alpha tends to a positive limit for a rational α\alpha is Problem 713.

Erdős's statements of the question. [Er64c], p. 35 (problem_p35): Turán's question for the regular bodies; "The problem of the cube seems difficult. I can show that for sufficiently large cc every G(n,[cn3/2])\mathfrak G(n,[cn^{3/2}]) contains a hexagon and a vertex joined to three non adjacent vertices of the hexagon but I cannot decide whether it contains a cube", after which he notes that the icosahedron, the dodecahedron and the higher-dimensional cubes had not yet been studied. [Er74c], display (7), p. 78 (equation_7): "Let GG be the skeleton of a cube. Simonovits and I proved [9] (7) f(n;G)<cn8/5f(n;G)<cn^{8/5}. We could not decide whether (7) is best possible." [Er75], Chapter 2, p. 8 (problem_p8): "It would be very interesting to decide if the exponent 8/58/5 in (1) is best possible." [Er81], Part III, item 2 (pp. 6--7 of the retyped version): after display (1), lim⁡f(n;G)/n1+α=cG\lim f(n;\mathcal G)/n^{1+\alpha}=c_{\mathcal G} for bipartite G\mathcal G, with "I offer 500 dollars for a proof or disproof of this conjecture", "Is it true that (2) f(n;G)>cn8/5f(n;\mathcal G)>cn^{8/5}, where in (2) G\mathcal G is the graph determined by the edges of a cube?", and on p. 7 "f(n;G)<c1n8/5f(n;\mathcal G)<c_1n^{8/5} is a theorem of Simonovits and myself"; the prize attaches to (1), the general exponent conjecture, not to the cube question (2), and the site records no prize for this problem. [Er93], Chapter I, display (3), p. 334: Erdős recalls that he and Simonovits (his [5]) proved more than twenty years earlier that for GG the graph of the three-dimensional cube, bipartite and 33-regular with 88 vertices and 1212 edges, display (3) T(n;G)<cn8/5T(n;G)<cn^{8/5} holds, and continues: "We conjectured that the exponent 8/5 in (3) is best possible and that T(n;G) n8/5→cT(n;G)\,n^{8/5}\to c [sic], 0<c<∞0<c<\infty but we could not even prove T(n;G)/n3/2→∞T(n;G)/n^{3/2}\to\infty" (the exponent −8/5-8/5 is meant in the limit); the survey states only the cube and offers no prize for it. Erdős's printed question is thus the Q3Q_3 case, whether 8/58/5 is the exponent; the site's wording asks for every kk.

Search scope. None of the routes below found a bound improving O(n8/5)O(n^{8/5}) or Ω(n3/2)\Omega(n^{3/2}) for the cube, a determination of the exponent for any k≥3k\ge3, or a proof claim.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab; the community database record; the formal-conjectures directory at main as of 2026-09-18 (no file 576).
  • The primary sources: [ErSi70] pp. 377--379, [JaSu22] pp. 1--2 and 17, [SuTo22] (arXiv v1) searched throughout for the hypercube, with its Theorem 1.1, [Er74c] p. 78, [Er81] retyped version pp. 6--7, [Er64c] p. 35, [Er75] p. 8, [Ch97] preprint p. 9.
  • arXiv: the abstract pages of 2211.02015 (v3 of 22 January 2024 the latest; no journal reference) and 2009.00528 (v1 only); the API query abs:hypercube AND (abs:"Turan number" OR abs:"extremal number") (six records; their titles concern Turán problems inside the hypercube, incidence graphs and a layer of the hypercube, none a bound for ex(n;Qk)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_k)).
  • Crossref records for the journal versions of [JaSu22] (Forum of Mathematics, Sigma 12 (2024)) and [SuTo22] (IMRN 2022, no. 13), by bibliographic query.
  • The Semantic Scholar citation list of [JaSu22] (ten records; titles on rainbow cycles, sublinear expanders, a Turán exponent for 2-complexes and locally decodable codes; none a new hypercube bound).

Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X. Not consulted: the IMRN version of [SuTo22], the journal version of [JaSu22], Füredi's paper, Liu's lecture notes (the source of Question 1.3), and, for this problem, Erdős and Simonovits's 1984 supersaturation paper for the cube, carded under Problem 146. [Er93] lies outside the search.

Remaining gaps. (1) The exponent of ex(n;Qk)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_k) is unknown for every k≥3k\ge3; for the cube the gap n3/2n^{3/2} to n8/5n^{8/5} is unchanged since 1970. (2) The site's [SuTo22] bound is cited only as an attributed restatement in [JaSu22]; the IMRN text was not consulted, and of the Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. paper whose abstract announces the statement only the abstract was read. (3) [Er93] (p. 334) is checked at statement depth only; it states the cube question without proof and adds no bound. (4) Proof coverage is statements only: displays (4), (5), (10) of [ErSi70] and Theorems 1.2, 1.4, 1.5 of [JaSu22] are claims checked, no proof verified. (5) The retyped version of [Er81] carries its own pagination, not the journal's. (6) There is no Lean statement of the problem.

Known results

  • Erdős--Simonovits, display (5) (1970): ex(n;Q3)≤O(n8/5)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_3)\le O(n^{8/5}), the best upper bound for the cube; display (4): ex(n;Q3−e)≍n3/2\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_3-e)\asymp n^{3/2}, and the 4-cycle lower bound (12+o(1))n3/2≤ex(n;Q3)(\tfrac12+o(1))n^{3/2}\le\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_3) through display (2).
  • Janzer--Sudakov, Theorem 1.4 (2024, refereed): ex(n;Qk)=Ok(n2−1k−1+1(k−1)2k−1)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_k)=O_k(n^{2-\frac1{k-1}+\frac1{(k-1)2^{k-1}}}) for k≥3k\ge3, the best upper bound for k≥4k\ge4; their p. 17: the lower bound Ω(n2−2k−2k2k−1−1)\Omega(n^{2-\frac{2^k-2}{k2^{k-1}-1}}) from the deletion method.
  • Theorem 1.2 (attributed to Sudakov and Tomon): ex(n,H)=o(n2−1/d)\mathrm{ex}(n,H)=o(n^{2-1/d}) for Kd,dK_{d,d}-free bipartite HH with maximum degree at most dd on one side, whence ex(n;Qk)=o(n2−1/k)\mathrm{ex}(n;Q_k)=o(n^{2-1/k}) for k≥3k\ge3; superseded by Theorem 1.4.
  • Erdős 1964, p. 35, Erdős 1974, display (7), Erdős 1975, Chapter 2 and [Er81], Part III, item 2, display (2): the question in Erdős's words, for the cube.
  • Chung 1997, Problem (36): the question in the site's general form, with the 1997 bounds for Q3Q_3, unchanged.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.