Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 794
claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 794, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Is it true that every -uniform hypergraph on vertices with at least edges must contain either a subgraph on vertices with edges or a subgraph on vertices with edges?
Formulation. The site's wording(the page carries no last-edited date). It restates Erdős's 1969 conjecture, printed as "Every contains either a or a " ([Er69], p. 81; result page). The threshold and both forbidden configurations are Erdős's own print, and none of his words contradicts them, so the wording is judged as printed. Two facts recorded by the site's commentary and checked below bear on it: the second alternative is redundant, since a five-vertex 3-graph with seven edges always contains four vertices spanning three edges (Balogh's observation), and the statement is false, since the complete 3-partite 3-graph with three classes of vertices plus one triple inside a class has edges and no four vertices spanning three edges (Harris's counterexample at ). The threshold on vertices corresponds to the density .
The site's commentary calls the statement probably misstated and reads it as Turán's problem: determine , the largest number of triples on vertices with no four vertices spanning three of them, that is in the notation of [FrFu84], and ask whether its density equals . It records that Turán had conjectured before [Er69] (the asymptotic of [FrFu84], p. 323), that Frankl and Füredi's construction gives at least , which it calls the conjectured truth, and that the statement likely carries a typo. That reading is a guess no label acts on, so it is a variant with its own answer. Its question whether equals has the answer no: Theorem 3 of [FrFu84] (result page), , the lower bound from an iterated six-way blow-up and the upper bound de Caen's, gives , and the same paper refutes Turán's conjectured asymptotic (density ). The exact value of is open. Sharper upper bounds from flag algebras exist in the literature (named in the Current assessment), but no value from them is recorded here, so this page records none below . Erdős's own 1974 remark ([Er74c], p. 81) already calls the determination of "very difficult, perhaps as difficult as Turán's problem on ". No determination of and no proof claim was found in the search whose scope the Current assessment records; this is a bounded negative finding for the exact value of , not a certificate of openness.
Status. Disproved, by an elementary counterexample to the statement as printed. The counterexample is the site's, due to Harris, recomputed in the Current assessment: the -uniform hypergraph on whose edges are the triples with one element in each of , , and the triple has edges on vertices, and no four of its vertices span three edges (the check is in the Current assessment), so the statement fails at . The same construction (the complete 3-partite 3-graph on vertices plus one triple inside a class) fails it for every by the same check, a class needing three vertices to hold the extra triple. The frontmatter standing is derived from the accepted claim page Harris's counterexample, whose acceptance evidence is the site's own and which also carries the links to the Lean checks of the example; a pending claim page, Aristotle's Lean proof published by Alexeev, records an independent Lean proof of the construction for every . The site's label DISPROVED (LEAN) carries a catalog suffix explained under Formalization: the counterexample has been checked in Lean in external files the corpus has not built.
Source. erdosproblems.com/794, accessed 2026-09-18T10:47Z: the problem page (DISPROVED (LEAN), the label's gloss saying the problem is solved in the negative with the proof verified in Lean; no last-edited date; source key [Er69, p. 81]; commentary citing [FrFu84] and thanking Rishika Agrawal, Jozsef Balogh and Phillip Harris), its three-comment discussion thread (5 February 2026) and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #794, https://www.erdosproblems.com/794, accessed 2026-09-18.
References.
- [Er69] Erdős, Paul, Some applications of graph theory to number theory. The Many Facets of Graph Theory (Proc. Conf., Western Mich. Univ., Kalamazoo, Mich., 1968), Springer (1969), 77--82; the conjecture, p. 81, and the Turán paragraph before it, p. 80. Library home: erdos_1969_applications_graph_theory_number_theory; paged at conjecture_p81.
- [FrFu84] Frankl, P. and Füredi, Z., An exact result for -graphs. Discrete Math. 50 (1984), 323--328, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(84)90058-X (Crossref record read; the site's reference text gives "Discrete Math. (1984), 323--328"); Theorem 3, p. 325; the disproof sentence, p. 324. Library home: frankl_1984_exact_result_graphs.
- [Er74c] Erdős, Paul, Extremal problems on graphs and hypergraphs. Hypergraph Seminar, Lecture Notes in Math. 411 (1974), 75--84; p. 81. Not cited by the site for this problem. Library home: erdos_1974_extremal_problems_graphs_hypergraphs.
- [JLM26] Jain, V., Luo, H. and Mubayi, D., On the maximum density of -graphs in which every -set spans or edges. arXiv:2606.20367 (18 June 2026; abstract read). A preprint on Problem 1 of [FrFu84]; lead, recorded below.
Formalization. The site's "(Lean)" suffix is a catalog label. The file
ErdosProblems/794.lean
of formal-conjectures,(the link is pinned to that revision),
declares
erdos_794 : answer(False) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ H : Finset (Finset (Fin (3 * n))), H.IsThreeUniform → n ^ 3 + 1 ≤ H.card → H.ContainsSubgraph 4 3 ∨ H.ContainsSubgraph 5 7
under category research solved, AMS 5, with proof sorry and a formal_proof
attribute naming the file src/v4.29.1/ErdosProblems/Erdos794.lean in the
repository plby/lean-proofs on its main branch (unpinned). It carries three
variants, at that commit all research solved with sorry: balogh (a
three-edge four-vertex subgraph in every 3-uniform hypergraph with a seven-edge
five-vertex subgraph), harris (harrisHypergraph, the 27 transversal triples
of the parts , , plus , is
3-uniform, has 28 edges and contains neither forbidden subgraph) and
frankl_furedi (for every and all large a 3-uniform
hypergraph on vertices with no four vertices spanning three edges and at
least edges). Since 18 September 2026 the file
proves the balogh variant in full, by the double count below, and the harris
variant by decide +kernel; erdos_794 and frankl_furedi keep sorry, and
the file spells the uniformity predicate IsUniform 3. The
external file named by the attribute, at the lean-proofs commit of 15 September
2026 pinned on the claim page: 84 lines, headed
leanprover/lean4:v4.29.1 mathlib v4.29.1, importing Mathlib, naming Phillip
Harris as informal author and Aristotle, ChatGPT and Boris Alexeev as formal
authors, and linking the site's thread. It defines the parts S1 = {1, 2, 3},
S2 = {4, 5, 6}, S3 = {7, 8, 9}, the edge set counterexample_edges (the
transversal triples and extra_edge = {1, 2, 3}) and
has_subgraph E v e := ∃ s, s ⊆ V_set ∧ s.card = v ∧ (E.filter (· ⊆ s)).card ≥ e
with V_set = Finset.Icc 1 9; proves counterexample_disproves_conjecture
(every edge has three elements, at least edges, no (4, 3) and no
(5, 7) subgraph) by decide; defines its own predicate erdos_794 (for all
n, every V with V.card = 3 * n and every 3-uniform E with
E.card ≥ n ^ 3 + 1 has a (4, 3) or (5, 7) subgraph) and proves
not_erdos_794 : ¬ erdos_794 by instantiating n = 3; a closing comment
records #print axioms as propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound. The
file contains no sorry, axiom, native_decide or unsafe. Two observations
of the corpus's own: the file's erdos_794 searches for subgraphs inside the
fixed set V_set rather than inside V, so it is not a literal transcription
of the collection's statement, though for the counterexample, whose edges all
lie in V_set, the refutation is sound; and the collection's harris variant
and the external file's counterexample_disproves_conjecture state the same
finite check with the vertices shifted by one. The thread names two further
files at Lean v4.24.0 in the same repository: Erdos794b.lean, the same finite
check by native_decide, linked on Harris's page, and Erdos794c.lean, a proof
found by Aristotle without a supplied proof of the construction's properties for
every , recorded on
its own claim page.
The corpus has not built or audited any of these files, and no local credit is
claimed. The community database (teorth/erdosproblems, data/problems.yaml) records status "disproved (Lean)" and formal_status Lean as
of its last update on 5 February 2026, the statement formalized since 4 August
2026, and no formal-proof field; the site's indicator reads "Yes".
Current assessment
The question (site formulation of 2026-09-18). The statement above;
DISPROVED (LEAN); no last-edited date. The commentary records Balogh's
observation that the statement is probably misstated, since a -graph with
seven edges on five vertices always has four vertices spanning three edges, so
the second alternative is redundant; it then takes the question to be the Turán
problem for (four vertices spanning three edges) in -graphs and asks
whether the threshold density is ; it cites the Frankl--Füredi construction
[FrFu84] for a density of at least , which it calls the conjectured truth,
noting that Turán had conjectured before [Er69] and that the statement
likely carries a typo; and it records Harris's counterexample to the statement
as written, the -graph on with the transversal triples
of and the edge , edges in all.
The thread's three comments, all of 5 February 2026 (the update to the first is
later, since the file it links was first committed on 6 February 2026): a
comment by Alexeev (19:27) reporting that Harris's counterexample was formalized
by the direct finite check, with a link to the external file, a variant using
native_decide and an update that Aristotle proved the result by itself without
a supplied proof, with essentially the same example, to which the site appended
a note that the page had been updated in response; a second commenter's remark
(19:33) on the difference between native_decide and decide; and a comment by
Alexeev (19:45) on the axioms each proof uses. The proof-claim tab is empty. The
community database lists the problem as disproved (Lean) as of its last update
on 5 February 2026.
The statement (the corpus's own checks). Two elementary checks, the corpus's own and named as such; the site attributes the observations to Balogh and Harris.
- Balogh's observation. A 3-uniform hypergraph on five vertices has at most edges; each of its five four-vertex subsets contains four of the ten triples, and each triple lies in exactly two of the five subsets. If seven triples are edges, the five subsets contain edges in total, so some subset contains at least three. Hence the second alternative of the statement implies the first, and the statement is equivalent to: every 3-uniform hypergraph on vertices with at least edges has four vertices spanning three edges.
- Harris's counterexample. Let , , and take the transversal triples (one element from each part) and the triple : edges on vertices. A four-vertex set meets in the pattern , , or up to the order of the parts. It contains a transversal triple only in the pattern , where it contains exactly two; it contains the edge only when it contains all of , in the patterns and , which contain no transversal triple, so such a set spans exactly one edge. Every four-vertex set therefore spans at most two edges, and by the first check no five-vertex set spans seven. The statement fails at . The same count works for the complete 3-partite 3-graph on vertices plus one triple inside a class, for every (a class needs three vertices to hold the extra triple): edges and no four vertices spanning three.
The disproof is therefore elementary and needs no unreviewed source; the
external Lean file records the check by decide, as described under
Formalization.
The Turán variant. The site's reading, recorded in the Formulation as a variant: Erdős's threshold on vertices (density ) was meant for the Turán-type problem of forbidding four vertices spanning three edges, that is , where the complete 3-partite construction is not extremal. The source-supported bounds are on Theorem 3 of Frankl and Füredi (p. 325): , where is the maximum number of edges in a 3-graph on vertices in which any four vertices span less than three edges (p. 323). The lower bound is Section 2's iterated construction: the six-class blow-up of the ten-triple 3-graph (Example 1, p. 323), which already "has more than edges which is more than , disproving Turàn's conjecture" (p. 324), refined by partitioning each class into six and adding the -pattern triples, and so on, to edges (p. 325); the upper bound "was proved by Caen [sic] [2]" (p. 325), the reference being D. de Caen. The densities: Erdős's statement corresponds to , Turán's conjectured to , Frankl and Füredi's construction to , de Caen's bound to . Acceptance evidence: Discrete Mathematics is refereed (the paper was received 24 January 1984). Proof coverage: Theorem 3, the definition and the disproof sentence at claims-checked depth; the count at statement depth; de Caen's proof is not in the paper. Theorems 1--2 of the same paper (p. 324) classify the 3-graphs in which every four vertices span exactly or edges (the blow-ups and the circle-and-origin example) and show over an equipartition extremal for ; they concern the stricter local condition and are context here. [Er74c], p. 81, five years after the conjecture: "the determination of seems to be very difficult, perhaps as difficult as Turán's problem on ". Flag-algebra upper bounds below exist in the literature: the Crossref abstract of Razborov's 2010 paper says its journal version includes "significantly improving numerical bounds for several problems for which the exact value is not known yet", and the citation lists name Baber and Talbot's "New Turán densities for 3-graphs" (Electron. J. Combin. 19 (2012), arXiv:1110.4287) and Falgas-Ravry and Vaughan's "Applications of the semi-definite method to the Turán density problem for 3-graphs" (Combin. Probab. Comput. 22 (2013), arXiv:1110.1623); Razborov's preprint has no bound, and the two abstracts do not state a value, so the best known upper bound is not recorded and is the bound this page cites.
The origin. [Er69], pp. 80--81 (result page): after "Turán conjectured that . It is easy to show that always exists and Turán proved [sic], but the value of is unknown for every ", Erdős writes: "I would like to state one further conjecture for -graphs: Every contains either a or a ." No argument is given, and the paper turns to number theory. (The printed differs from Turán's value in this normalization; recorded on the result page, not corrected.) The site's key [Er69, p. 81] matches.
Leads with provenance, not status. [JLM26] (abstract read) improves the lower bound for Problem 1 of [FrFu84] (the maximum density of an -graph in which every -set spans or edges) from to ; a preprint on the stricter local condition, not on . The September 2026 preprints on the uniform Turán density of the tetrahedron (arXiv:2609.08336, abstract read) record that the uniform Turán density of the "broken tetrahedron" was determined by Glebov, Král' and Volec (Israel J. Math. 211 (2016)) and Reiher, Rödl and Schacht (J. Eur. Math. Soc. 20 (2018)); the uniform density is a different quantity from .
Search scope. None of the routes below found a dispute of the disproof, a determination of , or a proof claim.
- The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab as of 2026-09-18; the formal-conjectures file at the revision pinned above; the external Lean file and the repository's directory listings at its head of 15 September 2026; the community database record.
- The primary sources, at the pages cited: [Er69] pp. 80--81, [FrFu84] pp. 323--328, [Er74c] pp. 80--81.
- Crossref: a bibliographic query for [FrFu84] (top record the Discrete Mathematics article, doi:10.1016/0012-365X(84)90058-X) and the record of Razborov's 2010 paper.
- arXiv API: the search
(abs:"K_4^-" OR abs:"K_4 minus an edge" OR abs:"K_4^{(3)-}" OR abs:"K_4^{3-}") AND abs:Turan(no records; a weak zero given the API's handling of TeX in phrases); the records of 1110.4287 (v3) and 1110.1623 (v2), 2606.20367 and 2609.08336. - Semantic Scholar: the citation list of [FrFu84] by DOI (123 records, by title; the titles are codegree-threshold papers and the uniform-density papers, none a determination of ).
Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X. Not examined: de Caen's 1983 paper; Turán's papers; the flag-algebra papers named above; the journal texts behind the uniform-density results.
Remaining gaps. (1) The Turán variant's best upper bound is not compiled: the page cites de Caen's from [FrFu84] and names the flag-algebra papers as leads. (2) Proof coverage is statements only on [FrFu84]; the two elementary checks above are this page's own and are the only arguments recomputed. (3) The external Lean files are not built or audited by the corpus; the Harris file's own predicate is looser than the collection's statement, as recorded. (4) [Er69]'s printed is recorded as printed.
Known results
- Erdős 1969, p. 81: the conjecture as printed; false as stated (the checks above).
- Frankl--Füredi, Theorem 3 (1984, refereed): ; the construction and the disproof of Turán's .
- [Er74c] p. 81 (1974): the density problem called "very difficult".
- Harris's counterexample: the example as a claim page, with the Lean checks of it (pinned on the claim page; not built by the corpus) as its formalization links.
- Aristotle's Lean proof published by Alexeev: the construction's properties for every , proved in Lean without a supplied proof; a pending claim, not built by the corpus.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.
- erdos_1974_extremal_problems_graphs_hypergraphs
- frankl_1984_exact_result_graphs
- frankl_1984_exact_result_graphs / example_1
- frankl_1984_exact_result_graphs / theorem_1
- frankl_1984_exact_result_graphs / theorem_2
- frankl_1984_exact_result_graphs / theorem_3
- erdos_1979_problems_results_graph_theory_combinatorial_analysis
- erdos_1979_problems_results_graph_theory_combinatorial_analysis / question_p157
- erdos_1969_applications_graph_theory_number_theory
- erdos_1969_applications_graph_theory_number_theory / conjecture_p81