Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 803

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 803, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. We call a graph HH DD-balanced (or DD-almost-regular) if the maximum degree of HH is at most DD times the minimum degree of HH.

Is it true that for every m≥1m\geq 1, if nn is sufficiently large, any graph on nn vertices with ≥nlog⁡n\geq n\log n edges contains a O(1)O(1)-balanced subgraph with mm vertices and ≫mlog⁡m\gg m\log m edges (where the implied constants are absolute)?

Formulation. The site's wording, accessed 2026-09-18 (page last edited 7 October 2025). The origin is the second open problem closing [ErSi70] (p. 389; result page): "Is it true that every GnG^n, e(Gn)=[nlog⁡n]e(G^n)=[n\log n] contains a dd-regular subgraph GmG^m, e(Gm)>εmlog⁡me(G^m)>\varepsilon m\log m where mm tends to infinity together with nn?", where "dd-regular" is the paper's name for DD-balanced (Definition 1, pp. 379--380). Two readings: the paper's, with a subgraph whose order m=m(n)→∞m=m(n)\to\infty and constants dd, ε\varepsilon read as absolute; and the site's, with every fixed m≥1m\ge1 and n≥n0(m)n\ge n_0(m), which is Alon's restatement ([Al08], preprint p. 2: "Is it true that there are absolute constants ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and DD, such that the following holds: For every mm there is some n0=n0(m)n_0=n_0(m) such that any graph with n>n0n>n_0 vertices and at least nlog⁡2nn\log_2n edges contains a DD-balanced subgraph with mm vertices and at least ϵmlog⁡2m\epsilon m\log_2m edges?"; Janzer and Sudakov, p. 11, keep "m→∞m\to\infty as n→∞n\to\infty"). The base of the logarithm changes constants only, and "at least nlog⁡nn\log n" and "exactly [nlog⁡n][n\log n]" edges give the same question, since a graph with more edges has a subgraph with exactly that many on the same vertex set (a remark made here). Alon's construction refutes both readings (below), so the choice does not affect the status; a Formulation note, no tension in the field.

Status. Disproved. The site's label was DISPROVED on 2026-09-18; on 2026-10-07 the page printed no label to an anonymous reader, and the community database lists the problem as disproved (Lean), a status its file has carried since 26 September 2026. Alon's Proposition 2.1 ([Al08], Discrete Math. 308 (2008), no. 19, 4460--4472; refereed; author's preprint, p. 2): "For every D>1D>1 and every n>105n>10^5, there is a graph GG with at most 2n2n vertices and at least 2nlog⁡(2n)2n\log(2n) edges such that the following holds. For any mm and dd, if there is a subgraph HH of GG with mm vertices, average degree at least dd, and maximum degree at most DdDd, then d<36(4log⁡m+log⁡(64D)+18)d<36(4\sqrt{\log m}+\log(64D)+18)", introduced by "In this section we show that this is not true." A DD-balanced subgraph with mm vertices and average degree dd has maximum degree at most DdDd, so it has e(H)=md/2<72mlog⁡m+18mlog⁡(64D)+324me(H)=md/2<72m\sqrt{\log m}+18m\log(64D)+324m edges (a deduction made here), which is o(mlog⁡m)o(m\log m) for fixed DD: no absolute ϵ\epsilon works, whether mm is fixed and large or tends to infinity. The near-matching positive bound is Janzer and Sudakov's Theorem 6.3 (Forum Math. Pi 11 (2023), e19; refereed): given a positive integer m0m_0, there are n0=n0(m0)n_0=n_0(m_0) and ε=ε(m0)>0\varepsilon=\varepsilon(m_0)>0 for which each graph on n≥n0n\ge n_0 vertices with nlog⁡nn\log n or more edges contains a 6464-almost-regular subgraph whose vertex count mm is at least m0m_0 and whose edge count is at least εmlog⁡m/(log⁡log⁡m)3/2\varepsilon m\sqrt{\log m}/(\log\log m)^{3/2}, so Alon's bound is tight up to log⁡log⁡\log\log factors. The frontmatter standing is derived from the accepted claim page Alon's disproof, whose acceptance evidence is the refereed journal, the refereed quotation by Janzer and Sudakov and the site's own commentary; Theorem 6.3 proves a weaker statement and settles nothing of the question, so it has no claim page.

Source. erdosproblems.com/803, accessed 2026-09-18: the problem page (DISPROVED, with the site's remark that the answer is negative; last edited 7 October 2025; source key [ErSi70]; commentary citing [Al08], [JaSu23] and Problem 1077), its empty discussion thread and its empty proof-claim tab. On 2026-10-07 the page shows "Formalised statement? Yes", with the thread and the proof-claim tab empty. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #803, https://www.erdosproblems.com/803, accessed 2026-09-18.

References.

  • [Al08] Alon, Noga, Problems and results in extremal combinatorics---II. Discrete Math. 308 (2008), no. 19, 4460--4472, doi:10.1016/j.disc.2007.08.090 (Crossref record; the site's reference text gives "Discrete Math. (2008), 4460-4472"). Section 2, the printed problem and Proposition 2.1, p. 2 of the author's preprint (16 pp., pdfTeX of September 2007; the journal pagination is not in the preprint and the journal text is not held). Library home: alon_2008_problems_results_extremal_combinatorics; paged at proposition_2_1.
  • [JaSu23] Janzer, Oliver and Sudakov, Benny, Resolution of the Erdős--Sauer problem on regular subgraphs. Forum Math. Pi 11 (2023), Paper No. e19, 13 pp.; doi:10.1017/fmp.2023.19 (received 2 November 2022, accepted 29 June 2023); arXiv:2204.12455 (v2, 15 August 2022). Section 6, Theorems 6.1--6.3, p. 11 of the journal version (the same page in arXiv v2). Library home: janzer_2023_resolution_erdos_sauer_problem_regular_subgraphs; paged at theorem_6_3 and, for the quotation of Alon, theorem_6_2.
  • [ErSi70] Erdős, P. and Simonovits, M., Some extremal problems in graph theory. Combinatorial theory and its applications, I (Proc. Colloq., Balatonfüred, 1969), North-Holland (1970), 377--390; the open problem, p. 389; Definition 1 and Theorem 1, pp. 379--380. Library home: erdos_1970_extremal_problems_graph_theory; paged at question_p389 and theorem_1.
  • [PRS95] Pyber, L., Rödl, V. and Szemerédi, E., Dense graphs without 3-regular subgraphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 63 (1995), 41--54, doi:10.1006/jctb.1995.1004. Library home: pyber_1995_dense_graphs_without_3_regular_subgraphs. Alon's construction "is based on a modification of the technique of Pyber, Rödl and Szemerédi" ([Al08], p. 2): their random bipartite graph (printed pp. 42--43) joins each of the nn vertices of a class BB to exactly one random vertex in each of about 12log⁡10log⁡10n\tfrac12\log_{10}\log_{10}n classes AjA_j of n/210jn/2^{10^j} vertices, where Alon's uses classes Bi,jB_{i,j} of n/2in/2^i vertices; the paper's own almost-regular consequence (p. 42), graphs with cnlog⁡log⁡ncn\log\log n edges and no subgraph with all degrees strictly between DxD_x and xDxxD_x, is the nlog⁡log⁡nn\log\log n analogue of this question. The paper is context for the construction, not a result on the problem.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures, file ErdosProblems/803.lean, added on 2026-09-20 (no file existed on 2026-09-18). As of that commit its erdos_803 states the site's question with absolute constants, answered False, in the category research solved, and carries a formal_proof attribute naming theorem not_erdos_803 of Erdos803.lean in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs repository (informal author Noga Alon; formal authors Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol); the file also states Alon's bound and Janzer and Sudakov's bound as variants without proofs. The community database (teorth/erdosproblems, data/problems.yaml,) lists the problem as disproved (Lean), a status its file has carried since 26 September 2026 (the entry's update date is 16 September 2026), through Collin Yuanjie Ren's package formalizing Alon's construction and both negative readings, and a formalized statement since 2026-09-20. The site's indicator reads "Formalised statement? Yes" (2026-10-07). Both Lean developments are formalization links on Alon's claim page, which says what each proves; the corpus has built and audited neither, so they give no formalized evidence.

Current assessment

The question (site formulation, accessed 2026-09-18). The statement above; DISPROVED; last edited 7 October 2025. The commentary attributes the problem to Erdős and Simonovits [ErSi70], who proved the analogue with ncn^c and mcm^c in place of log⁡n\log n and log⁡m\log m for every constant c>0c>0, the balance parameter allowed to depend on cc; it credits Alon [Al08] with the disproof, in the form that, once nn is large, for each D>1D>1 some nn-vertex graph with nlog⁡nn\log n or more edges has no DD-balanced subgraph on mm vertices with more than O(mlog⁡m+log⁡D)O(m\sqrt{\log m}+\log D) edges; it records Janzer and Sudakov's [JaSu23] positive result, that for each kk and all large nn such a graph has an O(1)O(1)-balanced subgraph on some m≥km\ge k vertices with ≫kmlog⁡m/(log⁡log⁡m)3/2\gg_k m\sqrt{\log m}/(\log\log m)^{3/2} edges; and it points to Problem 1077 twice. The discussion thread has no comments and the proof-claim tab is empty. The community database listed the problem as disproved on 2026-09-18 (entry last updated 31 August 2025); its file has carried disproved (Lean) since 26 September 2026.

The disproof. Proposition 2.1 of [Al08], quoted in the Status (p. 2 of the preprint), with the section's definition ("A graph is called DD-balanced if the ratio between the maximum degree of a vertex in it and the minimum degree of a vertex in it is at most DD") and its convention that logarithms are in base 2. Deduction to the statement's form, made here: if HH is a DD-balanced subgraph of Alon's graph GG on mm vertices with average degree dd, then Δ(H)≤Dδ(H)≤Dd\Delta(H)\le D\delta(H)\le Dd, so the proposition applies and e(H)=md/2<18m(4log⁡m+log⁡(64D)+18)e(H)=md/2<18m(4\sqrt{\log m}+\log(64D)+18); for fixed DD and ϵ\epsilon this is below ϵmlog⁡m\epsilon m\log m once mm is large, so the statement fails for every fixed large mm (the site's form) and for m→∞m\to\infty (the paper's form). Adding isolated vertices to reach exactly N=2nN=2n vertices gives an NN-vertex graph with at least Nlog⁡NN\log N edges, the statement's hypothesis. Acceptance evidence: publication in Discrete Mathematics, refereed (Crossref record, October 2008); the refereed [JaSu23] quotes the result as its Theorem 6.2 and calls it "a negative answer to this question"; the site's account. Coverage: claims checked for the definition, the printed problem and the proposition; the proof (pp. 2--4, a random bipartite graph with a class AA of nn vertices and classes Bi,jB_{i,j} of n/2in/2^i vertices, each vertex of AA joined to one random vertex of each Bi,jB_{i,j}, and a union-bound Claim on the edges between small vertex sets) is not checked; the journal text is not held.

A site-versus-source note on the constants. [JaSu23]'s Theorem 6.2 prints Alon's bound as "at most 72mlog⁡m+18log⁡(64K)+32472m\sqrt{\log m}+18\log(64K)+324 edges" (p. 11), and the site's bound ≪mlog⁡m+log⁡D\ll m\sqrt{\log m}+\log D follows that form; Alon's inequality gives, through e(H)=md/2e(H)=md/2, the terms 18mlog⁡(64D)18m\log(64D) and 324m324m with a factor mm. Both forms are O(mlog⁡m+mlog⁡D)O(m\sqrt{\log m}+m\log D) for fixed DD and the difference does not touch the disproof; recorded as printed in each source (theorem_6_2), not resolved.

The positive bound. [JaSu23], Theorem 6.3 (p. 11), restated in the Status; the sentence before it says that Theorem 5.3, the paper's structural core, "implies that we can always find an almost-regular mm-vertex subgraph with nearly mlog⁡mm\sqrt{\log m} edges, showing that Theorem 6.2 is tight up to log⁡log⁡\log\log factors". The constant ε\varepsilon depends on m0m_0, which is the site's "≫k\gg_k" and "m≥km\ge k". Acceptance evidence: Forum of Mathematics, Pi is refereed, and the published article carries "Received: 2 November 2022; Accepted: 29 June 2023". Coverage: claims checked; the derivation from Theorem 5.3, printed on p. 12, and the proof of Theorem 5.3 (pp. 10--11) are not checked. Theorem 6.4 of the same section (a 6464-almost-regular subgraph of average degree about (d/log⁡log⁡n)1/4(d/\log\log n)^{1/4} in a graph of average degree d≥2log⁡log⁡nd\ge2\log\log n) is context, recorded on the card. What remains open is the exact order: between mlog⁡m/(log⁡log⁡m)3/2m\sqrt{\log m}/(\log\log m)^{3/2} and O(mlog⁡m+mlog⁡D)O(m\sqrt{\log m}+m\log D).

The origin and the dense case. [ErSi70], p. 389: the question quoted in the Formulation note, the second of the paper's two closing open problems (the first is Problem 1077's), preceded on p. 388 by "By the method of random graphs we can show that for every dd and ε\varepsilon there is GnG^n, e(Gn)=[n3/2]e(G^n)=[n^{3/2}], which does not have a dd-regular subgraph GmG^m such that e(Gm)≥εn me(G^m)\ge\varepsilon\sqrt n\,m". The analogue the site's commentary mentions is Theorem 1 (p. 380): "If e(Gn)≥n1+αe(G^n)\ge n^{1+\alpha} and d=10⋅21/α2+1d=10\cdot2^{1/\alpha^2+1} then G(n)G^{(n)} contains a dd-regular subgraph GmG^m such that e(Gm)≥25m1+αe(G^m)\ge\frac25m^{1+\alpha} and m≥nα1−α1+αm\ge n^{\alpha\frac{1-\alpha}{1+\alpha}} unless nn is too small", the balance parameter dd depending on α\alpha as the site says; Alon (p. 2) restates it with D=D(α)D=D(\alpha) and n>n0(α)n>n_0(\alpha). The paper prints "e(Gn)=[nlog⁡n]e(G^n)=[n\log n]" with an equality sign, where the site writes "≥nlog⁡n\ge n\log n" (equivalent, as noted above).

Search scope. None of the routes below found a dispute of the disproof, a sharpening of the log⁡log⁡\log\log gap, or a proof claim.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab; the formal-conjectures directory and tree as fetched on 2026-09-18 (no file 803); the community database entry as fetched that day.
  • Crossref: a bibliographic query for [Al08] (top record the Discrete Mathematics article, with the DOI above; the record carries no abstract).
  • arXiv API: the record of 2204.12455 (v1 26 April 2022, v2 15 August 2022, no journal reference); the search abs:"almost-regular subgraph" OR abs:"almost regular subgraph" OR abs:"almost-regular subgraphs" (five records: [JaSu23], Jiang and Longbrake 2025, a 2024 spectral-radius paper on almost regular subgraphs, two unrelated; none on the nlog⁡nn\log n regime beyond [JaSu23]).
  • The primary sources: [Al08] pp. 1--4; [JaSu23] p. 11; [ErSi70] pp. 377, 379--380 and 388--389.

Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, X. Not held: the journal text of [Al08].

Remaining gaps. (1) The journal text of [Al08] is not held; locators are preprint pages. (2) Proof coverage: statements only; Proposition 2.1's proof and Theorem 5.3 of [JaSu23] are not checked, and the deduction from the average-degree bound to the edge count is this page's own. (3) The quotation's dropped factors of mm are recorded, not resolved. (4) The exact order between mlog⁡m/(log⁡log⁡m)3/2m\sqrt{\log m}/(\log\log m)^{3/2} and mlog⁡mm\sqrt{\log m} is open; not the site's question. (5) The two Lean developments recorded under Formalization are third-party work that the corpus has not built or audited.

Known results

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.