Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 900

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 900, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. There is a function f:(1/2,∞)→Rf:(1/2,\infty)\to \mathbb{R} such that f(c)→0f(c)\to 0 as c→1/2c\to 1/2 and f(c)→1f(c)\to 1 as c→∞c\to \infty and every random graph with nn vertices and cncn edges has (with high probability) a path of length at least f(c)nf(c)n.

Formulation. The site's wording as of 2026-09-19 (page last edited 7 March 2026). The model is the uniform random graph with nn labeled vertices and cncn edges (Ajtai, Komlós and Szemerédi's Gn,N′G'_{n,N} with N=cnN=cn), c>1/2c>1/2 fixed and n→∞n\to\infty; "with high probability" means with probability tending to 11, and the length of a path is its number of edges. The statement asks for the existence of some ff with the two limits, not for a particular function: since a path of length at least g(c)ng(c)n is also one of length at least f(c)nf(c)n whenever f≤gf\le g, the content is that for every c>1/2c>1/2 some positive fraction of nn is almost surely reached and that the fraction can be taken as close to 11 as desired for large cc, the first limit being arranged by taking ff small near 1/21/2 (a remark of this page). At c=1/2c=1/2 itself the longest path has length O(nlog⁡n)O(\sqrt{n\log n}) (the paper's paragraph B), so no positive fraction is reached there. The site's wording follows Erdős's 1982 statement of the conjecture (p. 69, below); his 1975 statement asks a stronger question, an asymptotic (1+o(1))f(C)n(1+o(1))f(C)n for the longest cycle.

Status. Proved. The status-defining source is Theorem 2 of Ajtai, Komlós and Szemerédi, The longest path in a random graph, Combinatorica 1 (1981), 1--12 (refereed; the version of record): "The random (undirected) graph Gn,βn′G'_{n,\beta n} with nn vertices and βn\beta n edges, β>1/2\beta>1/2, almost surely contains a path of length cncn, c=c(β)c=c(\beta)", together with its Corollary, that for any prescribed path fraction c<1c<1 the exponential-rate bound holds for a large enough edge coefficient, its transfer sentence to the undirected model and its Remark 2 relating the fixed-edge and independent-edge models. The existence of a function ff with the two limits follows from these three statements by the deduction written under Status support, this page's own and not the paper's, which defines no single ff. Acceptance evidence: refereed publication; Erdős's own report of the proof in his 1982 collection ("All these conjectures were proved by Ajtai, Komlós and Szemerédi"); the site; the community database. Read depth: claims checked for Theorem 2, the Exponential rate, the Corollary and Remarks 1 and 2; the proofs (pp. 4--12) were not read. The result and its acceptance evidence are recorded on the claim page Ajtai--Komlós--Szemerédi, from which the frontmatter standing is derived.

Source. erdosproblems.com/900, accessed 2026-09-19: the problem page (PROVED, recording an affirmative solution; last edited 7 March 2026; source keys [Er78, p.32] and [Er82e]; commentary citing [AKS81]), its empty discussion thread and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #900, https://www.erdosproblems.com/900, accessed 2026-09-19.

References.

  • [AKS81] Ajtai, Miklós and Komlós, János and Szemerédi, Endre, The longest path in a random graph. Combinatorica 1 (1981), no. 1, 1--12, doi:10.1007/BF02579172 (Crossref; issued March 1981; received 12 September 1979). Theorem 2, the Exponential rate, the Corollary and Remark 1, printed p. 2; Remark 2, pp. 2--3. Library home: ajtai_1981_longest_path_random_graph; paged at theorem_2.
  • [Er78] Erdős, Paul, Problems and results in combinatorial analysis and combinatorial number theory. Proceedings of the Ninth Southeastern Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory, and Computing (Florida Atlantic Univ., Boca Raton, Fla., 1978) (1978), 29--40; Section 3, printed p. 32. Library home: erdos_1978_problems_results_combinatorial_analysis_combinatorial_number.
  • [Er82e] Erdős, Paul, Some of my favourite problems which recently have been solved. Proceedings of the International Mathematical Conference (Singapore, 1981), North-Holland Math. Stud. 74 (1982), 59--79; §1, printed p. 69. Library home: erdos_1982_my_favourite_problems_which_recently_have.
  • [Er75] Erdős, P., Problems and results on finite and infinite graphs. Recent advances in graph theory (Proc. Second Czechoslovak Sympos., Prague, 1974), Academia, Prague (1975), 183--192; Section VII, printed p. 188. Not a site key; [AKS81]'s reference [4] for the conjecture. Library home: erdos_1975_problems_results_finite_infinite_graphs, whose read status and Bears on row for this problem record the passage at claims checked.
  • [FdlV79] Fernandez de la Vega, W., Sur la plus grande longueur des chemins élémentaires de graphes aléatoires. Preprint, Laboratoire d'informatique pour les Sciences de l'Homme, C.N.R.S. (1979), as [AKS81]'s reference [3] gives it. The theorem [AKS81] quote in Remark 1: for p=1−e−d/np=1-e^{-d/n}, Gn,pG_{n,p} almost surely contains a path of length (1−2.21/d)n(1-2.21/d)n. The journal paper of the same year on the subject is Fernandez de la Vega, W., Long paths in random graphs. Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 14 (1979), 335--340 (zbMATH Zbl 0444.05052), which [AKS81] do not cite. Neither is held.

Formalization. None in the collection. No file ErdosProblems/900.lean existed in formal-conjectures on 2026-09-19 (the directory FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/, 682 entries, at the linked revision); the site's page shows "Formalised statement? No (create one)"; the community database (teorth/erdosproblems, data/problems.yaml, 2026-09-19) records the problem proved (last update 31 August 2025), unformalized, with no formalized statement and no formal-proof field. A Lean development that declares itself a formalization of the Ajtai--Komlós--Szemerédi theorem, in Boris Alexeev's repository plby/lean-proofs, is a formalization link on the claim page and is described under Leads; no build or audit of it is recorded, so it gives no formalized evidence.

Current assessment

The question (site formulation of 2026-09-19). The statement above; PROVED; last edited 7 March 2026. The commentary credits the proof to [AKS81] and remarks, as a curiosity, on the 1978 passage in which Erdős reports that Szemerédi did not believe the conjecture and expected the longest path to be o(n)o(n) at every density (the passage is quoted under The origins in Erdős's words). The discussion thread has no comments and the proof-claim tab is empty. The community database record says proved, as of its last update, dated 31 August 2025.

Status support. Theorem 2 of [AKS81] (p. 2): "The random (undirected) graph Gn,βn′G'_{n,\beta n} with nn vertices and βn\beta n edges, β>1/2\beta>1/2, almost surely contains a path of length cncn, c=c(β)c=c(\beta)." The paper's paragraph E introduces Theorems 1 and 2 with "The following results have been conjectured by P. Erdős [4]". The Exponential rate (p. 2): for any α>1\alpha>1 there are positive cc, KK and ϑ<1\vartheta<1 such that Dn,pD_{n,p}, p=α/np=\alpha/n, contains a directed path of length cncn with probability at least 1−Kϑn1-K\vartheta^n; the Corollary: "For arbitrarily prescribed c<1c<1 and ϑ>0\vartheta>0, there are α\alpha and KK such that the exponential rate holds with these parameters"; then "Same remark applies for Theorem 1, i.e. for Gn,pG_{n,p}, p=α/np=\alpha/n, α>1\alpha>1", a sentence whose "Theorem 1" must mean the undirected Theorem 2, since Gn,pG_{n,p} is the undirected model (recorded as printed). Remark 2 (pp. 2--3) transfers properties preserved by adding or deleting edges, such as the existence or nonexistence of a path, between Gn,N′G'_{n,N} and Gn,pG_{n,p} with p=N/(n2)p=N/\binom n2, so the undirected Corollary holds for the uniform model as well.

Deduction of the statement (this page's own). For β>1/2\beta>1/2 let c∗(β)c^*(\beta) be the supremum of the fractions c′c' such that Gn,βn′G'_{n,\beta n} almost surely has a path of length at least c′nc'n; Theorem 2 gives c∗(β)≥c(β)>0c^*(\beta)\ge c(\beta)>0, c∗≤1c^*\le1 because a path on nn vertices has fewer than nn edges, c∗c^* is nondecreasing in β\beta because adding random edges cannot shorten the longest path, and the undirected Corollary with Remark 2 gives c∗(β)→1c^*(\beta)\to1 as β→∞\beta\to\infty. The statement asks for an ff with 0<f(β)<c∗(β)0<f(\beta)<c^*(\beta) for every β>1/2\beta>1/2, f(β)→0f(\beta)\to0 as β→1/2\beta\to1/2 and f(β)→1f(\beta)\to1 as β→∞\beta\to\infty; every such ff satisfies the conclusion, since some fraction c′c' with f(β)<c′<c∗(β)f(\beta)<c'<c^*(\beta) is almost surely reached. One example is f(β)=(1−12β)min⁡{c∗(β),β−12}f(\beta)=(1-\tfrac1{2\beta})\min\{c^*(\beta),\beta-\tfrac12\}: the factor 1−12β1-\tfrac1{2\beta} lies in (0,1)(0,1), so ff is positive and below c∗c^*; f≤β−12f\le\beta-\tfrac12 gives the first limit; and for β≥3/2\beta\ge3/2, where β−12≥1≥c∗(β)\beta-\tfrac12\ge1\ge c^*(\beta), f=(1−12β)c∗(β)→1f=(1-\tfrac1{2\beta})c^*(\beta)\to1, the second. Positivity and f<c∗f<c^* alone do not give the second limit (c∗/2c^*/2 tends to 1/21/2), so both limits are conditions on the choice of ff. The paper does not define such an ff or identify the optimal one, and this page asserts no optimal function. Remark 1 (p. 2) records Fernandez de la Vega's independent theorem, a path of length (1−2.21/d)n(1-2.21/d)n in Gn,pG_{n,p} with p=1−e−d/np=1-e^{-d/n}, "i.e. our Theorem 2 for β>1.105\beta>1.105", with a longer path than the paper's for larger β\beta; it gives the second limit directly for that model. Acceptance evidence: Combinatorica is refereed (Crossref: volume 1, issue 1, March 1981); Erdős reports the proof himself in 1982; the site and the community database agree. Read depth: claims checked for the statements named; the proofs (Section 1, a branching-process argument for the directed case; Section 2, the shrinking method for the undirected case) were not read.

The origins in Erdős's words. [Er75], Section VII, printed p. 188, the paper [AKS81] cite: Erdős expects that for large CC almost all graphs G(n;Cn)G(n;Cn) have a cycle on more than (1−ϵ)n(1-\epsilon)n vertices, and states what he calls the strongest conjecture that could be true: "There is a function f(C)f(C) so that with probability tending to 1 the longest circuit of G(n;Cn)G(n;Cn) has size (1+o(1))f(C)n(1+o(1))f(C)n, f(C)→1f(C)\to1 as C→∞C\to\infty." He adds that f(12)=0f(\tfrac12)=0 and f(C)<1f(C)<1 both follow from his results with Rényi, and asks whether ff is continuous and strictly increasing for C≥12C\ge\tfrac12. This asks more than the site's statement: an asymptotic for the longest cycle, with a single function f(C)f(C), of which the paper proves the existence of a positive linear lower bound (its Remark 3 gives cycles of length cncn as well). [Er78], Section 3, printed p. 32: "It is true that almost all graphs G(n;[Cn])G(n;[Cn]) contain a path of length >cn2>cn^2 [sic]", where almost all means all but o(((n2)Cn))o\bigl(\binom{\binom n2}{Cn}\bigr) of them and where the print's exponent on cncn cannot be meant (a path in a graph on nn vertices has fewer than nn edges; the site's quotation omits it). The sentence is printed as an assertion, but its context reads it as a conjecture: Erdős writes that he conjectured this and believed that cc tends to 11 as CC tends to infinity, that "Szemerédi disagrees; he believes that for every CC the longest path is almost surely o(n)o(n)", and that "At present we can not decide who is right." [Er82e], §1, printed p. 69: "I conjectured that for every 12<c<∞\frac12<c<\infty there is a function f(c)f(c) so that every random graph G(n;cn)G(n;cn) contains a path of length at least f(c)nf(c)n where f(c)→0f(c)\to0 as c→12c\to\frac12 and f(c)→1f(c)\to1 as c→∞c\to\infty. All these conjectures were proved by Ajtai, Komlós and Szemerédi", followed by the reference to [AKS81]; this is the site's wording, and the 1978 passage's "Szemerédi disagrees" is the disagreement the site's commentary calls curious, resolved in Erdős's favor by Szemerédi's own paper.

Leads (not status). A Lean development for the problem exists in Boris Alexeev's repository plby/lean-proofs at its commit of 15 September 2026 (the claim page's link pins it), file src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos900.lean (39,108 bytes, 964 lines, with three modules in a folder Erdos900/), known here by its header and docstring only: the header lists Miklós Ajtai, János Komlós and Endre Szemerédi as informal authors and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as formal authors (the file's own credits, recorded as its provenance); the docstring says "Ajtai--Komlós--Szemerédi's theorem that every supercritical uniform random graph has, with high probability, a path of positive linear length", with Density the reals above 1/21/2 and a filter at the excluded endpoint; the file carries #print axioms Erdos900.erdos_900. The catalog does not cite this development; it is a formalization link on the claim page, nothing was built, and no formalized evidence is claimed. Semantic Scholar's list of papers citing [AKS81] (128 records, titles only) includes 2021--2025 papers on long cycles and paths in sparse random graphs and percolated expanders that sharpen the constants; by its title none concerns the existence statement of this problem.

Search scope. None of the routes below found a dispute of the theorem or a change of status.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab; the formal-conjectures directory and tree at the linked revision (no file 900); the community database entry; the external Lean file's header and notes file at the repository's commit of 15 September 2026 (GitHub).
  • Crossref: the record of doi:10.1007/BF02579172 ([AKS81]).
  • Semantic Scholar: the citing papers of [AKS81] (128 records, titles and venues only).
  • The primary sources: [AKS81] printed pp. 1--4, with pp. 2--3 at claims checked; [Er78] p. 32, [Er82e] p. 69 and [Er75] p. 188.

Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X; no arXiv search (the status-defining source is a 1981 journal paper, and the later sharpenings are not the problem). Not held: [FdlV79].

Remaining gaps. (1) Proof coverage: statements only; Theorem 2 and its companions are at claims checked, and nothing of the proof was read or reconstructed. (2) The deduction of the function ff from the paper's three statements is this page's own and carries no independent review. (3) Fernandez de la Vega's paper is not held; its theorem is known through Remark 1. (4) There is no Lean statement of the problem in the collection; no build or audit of the external development is recorded, so it is a formalization link on the claim page and no formalized evidence.

Known results

  • Ajtai--Komlós--Szemerédi 1981, Theorem 2 (refereed): a path of length c(β)nc(\beta)n almost surely for every β>1/2\beta>1/2, with the Exponential rate, the Corollary (fractions close to 11 for large density) and Remark 2 (the two models); the status-defining theorem. Remark 1: Fernandez de la Vega's (1−2.21/d)n(1-2.21/d)n for p=1−e−d/np=1-e^{-d/n} (not held).
  • [Er75], p. 188, [Er78], p. 32, and [Er82e], p. 69: the conjecture in Erdős's words, in the 1975 form for the longest cycle with an asymptotic, in the 1978 form with Szemerédi's disagreement, and in the 1982 form the site uses, with Erdős's report of the proof.
  • The external Lean development at its commit of 15 September 2026 (not built; a formalization link on the claim page, not evidence).

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.