Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 1006
claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 1006, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let be a graph with girth (that is, it contains no cycles of length or ). Can the edges of always be directed such that there is no directed cycle, and reversing the direction of any edge also creates no directed cycle?
Formulation. The site's wording as of 2026-09-18 (page last edited 2 December 2025). An orientation of has the required property when it has no directed cycle and, for every edge , the orientation obtained by reversing alone has no directed cycle either. The question asks whether every graph without and has such an orientation, so one graph of girth at least five with no such orientation answers it in the negative. Erdős's 1971 item 7 states the second condition as "no circuit which becomes directed if one reverses the direction of one of its edges", the same condition; Ore's question, as Erdős reports it, asked for a necessary and sufficient condition on , and the girth restriction is Erdős's, after Ore's and Gallai's triangle-free examples. Such an orientation is exactly an orientation of as the Hasse diagram of a partial order, as the digest of the Nešetřil--Rödl card also observes: in an acyclic orientation, reversing an arc creates a directed cycle exactly when another directed path runs from to , that is, exactly when is not a cover relation of the order the orientation generates. So has an orientation of the required kind exactly when it is a cover graph, and a graph of girth at least five that is not a cover graph answers the question in the negative.
Status. Disproved. Corollary 3 of Nešetřil and Rödl [NeRo78b] (Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 72 (1978), 417--421; refereed) gives, for every , a graph with no cycle of length less than which under every ordering of its vertices contains a monotone path , , closed into an -cycle by the edge . With this is a graph of girth five with no orientation of the required kind; the deduction is written out below and is this page's own. Corollary 4 of the same paper states the Hasse-diagram form. The paper describes its result as "the full solution of an Erdös-Ore problem" and cites Erdős's 1971 list for the question. The claim page [[problems/extremal_graph_theory/E1006/claims/1978_11_01_nesetril_rodl|Nešetřil and Rödl 1978]] records the result, its postings and the acceptance evidence. O. Pretzel, "A non-covering graph of girth six" (Discrete Math. 63 (1987), 241--244; stated from its zbMATH summary and pending), constructs a graph of girth six that is not a cover graph, an explicit negative answer through the equivalence in the Formulation, recorded on [[problems/extremal_graph_theory/E1006/claims/1987_01_01_pretzel|Pretzel 1987]]. The standing in the frontmatter is derived from the claim pages.
Source. erdosproblems.com/1006, accessed 2026-09-18: the problem page (DISPROVED, which the site glosses as a negative resolution; last edited 2 December 2025; source keys [Er71], [Er76b]; commentary citing [NeRo78b]), its two-comment discussion thread (28 and 29 September 2025) and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1006, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1006, accessed 2026-09-18.
References.
- [NeRo78b] Nešetřil, Jaroslav and Rödl, Vojtěch, On a probabilistic graph-theoretical method. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 72 (1978), no. 2, 417--421, doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0507350-7 (received 20 May 1977, revised 6 January 1978; Crossref record). Corollary 3 and Figure 1, p. 419; Corollary 4, p. 419, with its one-sentence proof on p. 420; Theorem 2, pp. 418--419. Library home: nesetril_1978_probabilistic_graph_theoretical_method; paged at corollary_3 and corollary_4.
- [Er71] Erdős, P., Some unsolved problems in graph theory and combinatorial analysis. Combinatorial Mathematics and its Applications (Proc. Conf., Oxford, 1969) (1971), 97--109; item 7, p. 99, with Figure 1 (the Grötzsch graph) on p. 100. Library home: erdos_1971_unsolved_problems_graph_theory_combinatorial_analysis; the item is paged at item_7.
- [Er76b] Erdős, P., Problems and results in graph theory and combinatorial analysis. Proceedings of the Fifth British Combinatorial Conference (Univ. Aberdeen, Aberdeen, 1975), Congr. Numer. XV (1976), 169--192; Problem 8, p. 175 (the site's reference text for the key, 2026-09-18). Library home: erdos_1976_problems_results_graph_theory_combinatorial_analysis (a Rényi archive scan); paged at problem_8.
Formalization. None. No file ErdosProblems/1006.lean exists in
formal-conjectures at main on 2026-09-18 or on 2026-10-07; the site's
indicator says that no formalized statement exists; the community database
(teorth/erdosproblems, data/problems.yaml, 2026-09-18) records the problem
as disproved (its last update is dated 28 September 2025), unformalized,
with no formalized statement.
Current assessment
The question (site formulation of 2026-09-18). The statement above; DISPROVED; last edited 2 December 2025. The site's commentary, in this page's words: Erdős credited the question to Ore in [Er71]; Ore had a graph of girth without such an orientation, and Gallai observed that the Grötzsch graph is another; the answer is no, because Nešetřil and Rödl [NeRo78b] construct, for every , a graph of girth every orientation of which either has a directed cycle or has a cycle that a single edge reversal would make directed. The thread has two comments by one account (12:41 on 28 September 2025, reporting that Nešetřil and Rödl solved the problem and pointing to Corollary 4 by a link to the paper on the publisher's site, with the remark that the commenter had first proved the same result independently; 11:39 on 29 September 2025, a typo report on the commentary's wording), both marked as addressed by the site. The proof-claim tab is empty. The community database record says disproved, with its last update dated 28 September 2025.
The disproof. [[../library/extremal_graph_theory/nesetril_1978_probabilistic_graph_theoretical_method/corollary_3|Corollary 3]] of [NeRo78b], p. 419: "For every there exists a graph without cycles of length which contains for every ordering of its vertices a cycle of length with the ordering given in the Figure 1", where Figure 1 shows the vertices in increasing order joined along a path and by the arc from to . The paper adds: "(For the statement is evident, for it was proved by Ore. Gallai showed that the Grötsch [sic] graph is an example for . For this was asked by Erdös [4].)", its [4] being [Er71], which it cites as pp. 97--99 (the list runs to p. 109).
Deduction to the statement (the page's own authored argument, not the paper's). Take and let be the graph of Corollary 3: it has no and no , so its girth is at least five (exactly five, since it contains a -cycle). Let be any orientation of . If has a directed cycle, it fails the first condition. Otherwise is acyclic and its vertices have a topological ordering, in which every arc goes from the smaller to the larger vertex. Apply Corollary 3 to this ordering: has a -cycle formed by the monotone path and the edge joining its ends, and in all five arcs point forward, and . Reversing the single edge gives the directed cycle , so fails the second condition. Hence has no orientation of the required kind and the answer to the question is no. The same argument with any gives such graphs of every girth at least five, the form in which the site's commentary states the result. Corollary 4 (p. 419): "For every there exists a graph without cycles of length which is not a subgraph of a Hasse-diagram of a partially ordered set", with the proof "This follows immediately from Corollary 3 and answers a question of B. Bollobás" (p. 420); this is the form the thread's first comment points to, and the card's digest explains, as its own observation, why it answers the problem as well.
Acceptance evidence: refereed publication (Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society; received 20 May 1977, revised 6 January 1978; the Crossref record agrees with the paper's printed data), the site's label and the community database. Read depth: claims checked for Corollaries 3 and 4 and Theorem 2; the proofs of the Lemma (p. 418) and of Theorem 2 (p. 419) were read for structure only, and nothing is independently reviewed. Proof pointer: Theorem 2 places a copy of the ordered -cycle inside every edge of a -uniform hypergraph without short cycles that has edges (the Lemma, a first-moment deletion argument), and counts the hypergraphs in the resulting class that fail to contain a monotone copy under some ordering.
Origins. [Er71], item 7 (p. 99; paged at item_7): Erdős attributes the problem to Ore. Every graph can be oriented without a directed circuit; Ore asked for a necessary and sufficient condition on for an orientation with no directed circuit and, in Erdős's words, "no circuit which becomes directed if one reverses the direction of one of its edges". Such a graph has no triangle; one might guess that every triangle-free graph qualifies, but Ore showed otherwise, and Gallai showed that the Grötzsch graph (Figure 1, p. 100, eleven vertices; the paper spells "Grötsch") is a counterexample. Erdős then writes: "I could find no graph whose girth is greater than four and which cannot be directed in such a way." He adds that the Grötzsch graph is 4-chromatic and triangle-free, asks whether it is the only such graph on at most 11 vertices, and records in a footnote added in proof that this was known to several mathematicians. Ore's girth-four example, which the site's commentary mentions, is not described in the list. [Er76b], Problem 8 (p. 175; paged at problem_8) restates the question for graphs of girth greater than four, in the form the site's statement takes, and adds that Erdős had asked it several years earlier and that "as far as I know there are no results".
Cover-graph literature. By the equivalence in the Formulation, a graph of girth at least five that is not a cover graph answers the question no; the graphs of Corollary 4 are such graphs. The citing papers of [NeRo78b] listed by Semantic Scholar include five on cover graphs. O. Pretzel, "A non-covering graph of girth six", Discrete Math. 63 (1987), 241--244, constructs such a graph explicitly (its summary on zbMATH Open, Zbl 0651.05046) and is the second claim page. Pretzel's "On graphs that can be oriented as diagrams of ordered sets", Order 2 (1985), 25--40, and G. Brightwell and J. Nešetřil, "Reorientations of covering graphs", Discrete Math. 88 (1991), 129--132, have no summary on zbMATH Open, so whether either gives such a graph is not recorded. T. Bohman, A. Frieze, M. Ruszinkó and L. Thoma, "A note on sparse random graphs and cover graphs", Electron. J. Combin. 7 (2000), R19, show, by the paper's summary, that removing the triangles of a random graph with $p\le\kappa\log n/n$, , leaves a cover graph with high probability, and that at somewhat higher densities more than one edge per triangle must be deleted; neither statement gives a graph of girth at least five that is not a cover graph, so the paper does not answer the question. V. Rödl and L. Thoma, "On cover graphs and dependent arcs in acyclic orientations", Combin. Probab. Comput. 14 (2005), 585--617, determine, by the zbMATH Open review (Zbl 1075.05080), the supremum , over graphs of chromatic number and girth , of the least number of dependent arcs of an acyclic orientation divided by the number of edges, as ; this is positive for , so non-cover graphs of every girth exist, a later negative answer. The review states the formula, not this consequence, so the paper has no claim page.
Search scope. None of the routes below found a dispute of Corollary 3; the later cover-graph papers are listed above.
- The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab as of 2026-09-18; the formal-conjectures directory and tree as fetched that day (no file 1006); the community database entry as fetched that day.
- Crossref: the record of doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0507350-7.
- zbMATH Open: the records of the five cover-graph papers named above, and Crossref's record of doi:10.1016/0012-365X(87)90012-4.
- Semantic Scholar: the citation list of [NeRo78b] (sixty-odd records, titles and venues only).
- arXiv API:
abs:orientation AND abs:girth AND (abs:"Hasse diagram" OR abs:"cover graph" OR abs:reversing)(five records, on inversion diameters and total girth colorings, none on this question). - The primary sources: [NeRo78b] pp. 417--421, [Er71] pp. 99--100 and [Er76b] p. 175.
Not searched: MathSciNet, Google Scholar, X. Not held: Ore's and Gallai's original examples (known in this wiki only through [Er71] and [NeRo78b]); the cover-graph papers above.
Remaining gaps. (1) Proof coverage: Corollaries 3 and 4 and Theorem 2 are paged at claims checked; the probabilistic proof of Theorem 2 and the Lemma are read for structure only, and the deduction above is the page's own and unreviewed. Pretzel's theorem is stated from its summary, and his proof is not reproduced. (2) Ore's girth-four example is described in none of the texts cited here. (3) There is no Lean statement of the problem.
Known results
- Nešetřil--Rödl, Corollary 3 (1978, refereed): graphs of every girth containing, under every vertex ordering, a monotone -path closed into an -cycle by the edge joining its ends; the disproof, through the authored deduction above.
- Corollary 4: the Hasse-diagram form, answering a question of Bollobás; the form the site's thread cites.
- Pretzel 1987 (Discrete Math. 63, stated from its zbMATH summary; pending): an explicit graph of girth six that is not a cover graph; a second disproof, through the equivalence in the Formulation.
- Erdős 1971, item 7 and Erdős 1976, Problem 8: the question, Ore's and Gallai's triangle-free examples, and "as far as I know there are no results" (Problem 8, p. 175).
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.
- erdos_1971_unsolved_problems_graph_theory_combinatorial_analysis
- erdos_1971_unsolved_problems_graph_theory_combinatorial_analysis / item_7
- erdos_1976_problems_results_graph_theory_combinatorial_analysis
- erdos_1976_problems_results_graph_theory_combinatorial_analysis / problem_8
- nesetril_1978_probabilistic_graph_theoretical_method
- nesetril_1978_probabilistic_graph_theoretical_method / corollary_3
- nesetril_1978_probabilistic_graph_theoretical_method / corollary_4
- nesetril_1978_probabilistic_graph_theoretical_method / theorem_2