Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 632
claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 632, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. A graph is -choosable if for any assignment of a list of colours to each of its vertices there is a subset of colours from each list such that the subsets of adjacent vertices are disjoint.
If is -choosable then is -choosable for every integer .
Status. Disproved. Being -choosable is the same as being -choosable, that is, having list chromatic number at most . Dvořák, Hu and Sereni [DHS19] constructed a graph that is -choosable but not -choosable, a counterexample to the conjectured implication at ; the result is the accepted full claim Dvořák, Hu and Sereni. The question is from Erdős, Rubin and Taylor [ERT80], who printed it as an open question; a positive answer is sometimes called the -conjecture.
Source. erdosproblems.com/632, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #632, https://www.erdosproblems.com/632.
References.
- [DHS19] Dvořák, Zdeněk and Hu, Xiaolan and Sereni, Jean-Sébastien, [[../library/graph_coloring/dvorak_2019_4_choosable_graph_not_8_2_choosable/_index|A 4-choosable graph that is not -choosable]]. Adv. Comb. (2019), Paper No. 5, 9.
- [ERT80] Erdős, Paul and Rubin, Arthur L. and Taylor, Herbert, Choosability in graphs. (1980), 125-157.
Formalization. None recorded by the site. A Lean 4 development in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs collection declares itself a formalization of the claimants' result; it is linked from the claim page and described under Current assessment. This corpus has not built or audited it.
Current assessment
The site's formulation asserts that an -choosable graph is -choosable for every integer , the positive answer to an open question of Erdős, Rubin and Taylor [ERT80]. It is false: Theorem 2 of Dvořák, Hu and Sereni 2019 gives a graph that is -choosable but not -choosable, a counterexample at , refereed in Advances in Combinatorics and credited by the site's curator; the problem's standing derives from that accepted full claim. The paper's concluding remarks extend the construction to an -choosable graph that is not -choosable for every and leave open whether a -choosable graph that is not -choosable exists; neither the extension nor that open case is part of the question.
Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs collection holds a Lean 4 development, added
17 August 2026 and last changed 4 September 2026, whose header calls it a
formalization of a solution to the problem, names Dvořák, Hu and Sereni as the
informal authors and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as the formal authors. It builds the
paper's -vertex gadget and the uniformization by a root , and refutes
the conjecture stated for finite simple graphs with and
. The file is linked, pinned to a commit, from the claim page. This
corpus has not built or audited it, so the claim page lists no formalized
evidence; the community database records no formalized statement and the
formal-conjectures repository has no file for the problem (2026-10-07).
Search scope, 2026-10-07: the site's page and discussion thread (no comments, no proof claims), the community database (teorth/erdosproblems), the formal-conjectures repository, the lean-proofs collection and Crossref. No other claim on the problem was found.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.