Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 481

../

claims/: The 3 claim pages of Problem 481, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let a1,…,ar,b1,…,br∈Na_1,\ldots,a_r,b_1,\ldots,b_r\in \mathbb{N} such that ∑i1ai>1\sum_{i}\frac{1}{a_i}>1. For any finite sequence of nn (not necessarily distinct) integers A=(x1,…,xn)A=(x_1,\ldots,x_n) let T(A)T(A) denote the sequence of length rnrn given by

(aixj+bi)1≤j≤n,1≤i≤r.(a_ix_j+b_i)_{1\leq j\leq n, 1\leq i\leq r}.

Prove that, if A1=(1)A_1=(1) and Ai+1=T(Ai)A_{i+1}=T(A_i), then there must be some AkA_k with repeated elements.

Status. PROVED (LEAN). The site records the statement as true: first shown by Klarner in 1982, generalized by Kolpakov and Talambutsa in 2022, and proved independently by an elementary argument posted in the site's thread on 1 December 2025. The three are the claim pages Klarner, Kolpakov and Talambutsa and Barreto; the first two are accepted on refereed publication and the acceptance of the site's curator, Thomas Bloom, the third on that acceptance and Terence Tao's endorsement in the thread. Klarner's paper is not held, and Kolpakov and Talambutsa report that it omits the second part of its proof, which their Theorem 3 supplies in print. The (Lean) suffix is a catalog label: the community database lists the Lean status as of its last update on 1 December 2025, the day of the thread proof, whose comment links a Lean 4 web-editor formalization; a second Lean proof of the statement, with Barreto and Claude Opus 4.5 as its formal authors, sits in Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs repository; formal-conjectures holds only the statement, neither proof is recorded in formal-conjectures or the community database, and nothing was built or checked here (see Formalization). The site notes that the original formulation also required the least element of AkA_k to be large, a condition that, as the site credits Ryan Alweiss with pointing out, holds automatically, since the least element grows by at least one at each stage. Erdős and Graham, who pose the problem on printed p. 96 of their 1980 monograph, call its difficulty surprising. The thread also relates the problem to a 2002 shortlist problem and generalizes the harmonic-sum argument to non-affine maps whose growth ratios ci=lim sup⁡nfi(n)/nc_i=\limsup_n f_i(n)/n satisfy ∑i1/ci>1\sum_i 1/c_i>1; those are remarks, not claims on the question.

Source. erdosproblems.com/481, accessed 2026-09-04, and the page (PROVED (LEAN), last edited 3 December 2025, source keys [ErGr80, p. 96], [Kl82], [KoTa22]), its six-comment discussion thread (1 to 6 December 2025), its empty proof-claim tab (2026-09-05) and the site's history view (2026-10-07). Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #481, https://www.erdosproblems.com/481.

References.

  • [Kl82] Klarner, David A., A sufficient condition for certain semigroups to be free. J. Algebra 74 (1982), 140--148, DOI 10.1016/0021-8693(82)90010-2 (Crossref record). Not held; its Theorem 1.1 is cited through [KoTa22].
  • [KoTa22] Kolpakov, Alexander and Talambutsa, Alexey, On free semigroups of affine maps on the real line. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 150 (2022), 2301--2307, DOI 10.1090/proc/15832; arXiv:2105.09387 (19 May 2021). Theorem 3 is the non-freeness result. Library home: kolpakov_2022_free_semigroups_affine_maps_real_line.
  • [ErGr80] Erdős, P. and Graham, R. L., Old and new problems and results in combinatorial number theory. Monographies de L'Enseignement Mathématique 28 (1980); the problem on printed p. 96. Library home: erdos_1980_old_new_problems_results_combinatorial_number_theory.

Formalization. The site's (Lean) suffix is a catalog label. The file ErdosProblems/481.lean of formal-conjectures, pinned to the file's last change (2026-09-18; unchanged on main), declares erdos_481 for a b : Fin r → ℕ with 0 < a i for all i and 1 < ∑ i, (1 : ℝ) / a i, concluding ∃ k, ¬ ((T a b)^[k] [1]).Nodup for the list map T, under category research solved, with proof sorry and no formal_proof attribute; its docstring repeats the site's commentary. The community database (pinned copy of 2026-09-18) lists the problem as proved with the Lean marker and formal_status Lean, as of its last update on 1 December 2025, the statement as formalized and no formal-proof URL; the site's indicator records a formalized statement. Two Lean proofs are on record, neither in formal-conjectures or the community database: the web-editor formalization linked from the thread comment of 1 December 2025, carried in the link itself and not retained here, and the file ErdosProblems/Erdos481.lean of Boris Alexeev's lean-proofs repository (added 5 May 2026, pinned to its last change of 2026-08-10), whose header names Kevin Barreto as the informal author and Claude Opus 4.5 and Barreto as the formal authors, describing the result as proved and formalized by Barreto with assistance from Claude Opus 4.5, and which proves theorem erdos_481 (hr : 0 < r) (hC : 1 < C a) : ∃ k, 1 ≤ k ∧ ¬(A a b k).Nodup for its own list map A and reciprocal sum C, with no sorry and a closing comment recording the axioms propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound. Neither proof was built or audited here, and no kernel credit is claimed. Terence Tao's thread comment of 1 December 2025 reports that, asked for a literature review, ChatGPT DeepResearch cited the site's page and declared the problem open, while Gemini DeepResearch reproduced essentially the same argument as Barreto's without recognizing that it had established the result; that is a thread remark, and no such proof is on record as a claim.

Progress

Not yet compiled.

Known Results

Not yet compiled.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.