Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 119
claims/: The 4 claim pages of Problem 119, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let be an infinite sequence of complex numbers such that for all , and for let
Let .
Is it true that ?
Is it true that there exists such that for infinitely many we have ?
Is it true that there exists such that, for all large ,
Status. The site labels the problem SOLVED (LEAN); the Lean suffix refers to formal proofs by others, recorded on the claim pages, that this corpus has not built or audited. The site credits the first question to Wagner [Wa80], the second to Beck [Be91], and the third, the prize question, to Korsky with GPT 5.6-Pro. The claim pages are Wagner 1980 ( infinitely often), Beck 1991 (), Korsky 2026 ( by a one-page harmonic-analysis argument) and [[problems/polynomials/E0119/claims/2026_08_29_korsky|Korsky 2026 (second claim)]] (the sharper bound , which the site's commentary credits at the strength ); see Current assessment for the evidence.
Source. erdosproblems.com/119, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #119, https://www.erdosproblems.com/119.
References.
- [Be91] Beck, J., The modulus of polynomials with zeros on the unit circle: A problem of Erdős. Annals of Math. (1991), 609-651.
- [Er97f] Erdős, Paul, Some unsolved problems. Combinatorics, geometry and probability (Cambridge, 1993) (1997), 1-10. Library home: erdos_1997_some_unsolved_problems.
- [Ha74] Hayman, W. K., Research problems in function theory: new problems. (1974), 155-180.
- [Li77] Linden, C. N., The modulus of polynomials with zeros on the unit circle. Bull. London Math. Soc. (1977), 65-69.
- [Wa80] Wagner, Gerold, On a problem of Erdős in Diophantine approximation. Bull. London Math. Soc. (1980), 81-88.
Formalization. Statement in
formal-conjectures,
whose three parts are marked solved there with links to a Lean proof in the
lean-proofs repository; that proof and a second Lean development posted on
the site's thread are recorded on the claim page of the first Korsky bound
at their pinned locations; both are unbuilt and unaudited by this corpus.
Current assessment
The question, as the site states it (page last edited 2026-09-01), asks three
things of for a
sequence on the unit circle: whether , whether
infinitely often for some , and whether for all
large for some , the last carrying the prize offered in [Er97f]. The
site records the problem as Problem 4.1 of Hayman's 1974 collection [Ha74],
attributed to Erdős. The three questions are nested: the third implies the
second, the second the first. All three are answered yes, so the corpus records
the outcome as proved, each answer accepted on its claim page. Wagner [Wa80]
answered the first with infinitely often, accepted on
Wagner 1980; Beck [Be91]
answered the second with for all , with absolute
constants whose value is not known (the zbMATH review Zbl 0747.11031 states the
quantifiers), accepted on
Beck 1991; both are
refereed and credited by the site. The third was answered in July 2026 by Samuel
Korsky working with GPT 5.6-Pro: , by
smoothing with a Fejér kernel at the next point and summing, which turns the
one-sided maxima into a pair energy that Fourier expansion controls. The site's
thread marks that claim accepted as correct and its curator posted the full
argument; it is not refereed, and the corpus accepts it on the site's documented
acceptance, on
Korsky 2026. The same
claimant's later bound , believed sharp, is accepted on
the site's crediting sentence (page last edited 2026-09-01), which states the
resolution at the strength , that bound's exponent, on
Korsky 2026 (second claim);
the thread's acceptance mark is on the earlier claim, and the write-up is an
unrefereed shared PDF. On the other side, Erdős's construction with
for every and Linden's [Li77] with show that the exponent
in the second question is below , and the claimant's numerical construction
with of order about suggests as the true
exponent of the third; the exact order of and of the exponent
in the second question remain open. Two Lean developments of the accepted
argument exist, one posted on the thread and one in the lean-proofs
repository, the latter linked from the formal-conjectures statements of all
three parts. Proof coverage: none; both Lean developments are unbuilt and
unaudited by this corpus, and the proofs in [Wa80], [Be91] and the two write-ups
are recorded from the site's account and the thread, unchecked.
Search scope: the site's problem page as exported (last edited 2026-09-01),
its proof-claims thread with both comment threads (as of 2026-10-07), the
community database entry (solved with a Lean marker as of its last update, on
2026-08-23), the formal-conjectures file and the linked lean-proofs file at
its pinned commit, an arXiv search for a write-up by the claimant (none found),
and the zbMATH review of [Be91] (Zbl 0747.11031) for its quantifiers; no OpenAI
release item names this problem. MathSciNet was not searched and X was not
used.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.