Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 723
claims/: The 2 claim pages of Problem 723, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. If there is a finite projective plane of order then must be a prime power?
A finite projective plane of order is a collection of subsets of of size such that every pair of elements is contained in exactly one set.
Status. Falsifiable: the site labels the problem FALSIFIABLE and records that planes exist for every prime-power order, that the conjecture holds for while the existence of a plane of order is open, Bruck and Ryser's theorem [BrRy49] that an order or must be a sum of two squares, which rules out and , and the computer search that ruled out [La97].
Source. erdosproblems.com/723, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #723, https://www.erdosproblems.com/723.
References.
- [BrRy49] Bruck, R. H. and Ryser, H. J., The nonexistence of certain finite projective planes. Canad. J. Math. 1 (1949), 88-93.
- [La97] Lam, C. W. H., The search for a finite projective plane of order . Amer. Math. Monthly 98 (1991), no. 4, 305--318 [MR1103185 (92b:51013)]; the site's entry, "(1997), 335-355", refers to a reprint of the Monthly article, not held in this corpus. Library home: lam_1997_search_finite_projective_plane_order_10 (the author's 2005 revision of the article).
- [LTS89] Lam, C. W. H., Thiel, L. and Swiercz, S., The non-existence of finite projective planes of order 10. Canad. J. Math. 41 (1989), no. 6, 1117–1123. Not in the site's bibliography; the research paper behind the search [La97] reports. Not held.
Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures, left unproved there with the variants it lists, the order- question tagged open and the others tagged solved; it names no formal proof.
Current assessment
The question asks whether every finite projective plane has prime-power order. The standing is open: no result settles or claims to settle the question, and the two claim pages are accepted partial claims on refereed evidence. The site labels the problem falsifiable, since a counterexample is one finite projective plane of an order that is not a prime power, a finite set system whose defining property can be checked by enumeration; this is a body note, not a claim. Bruck and Ryser's theorem [BrRy49] excludes every order or that is not a sum of two squares, among them , , and ; Lam, Thiel and Swiercz's computer search [LTS89], which the site cites through Lam's expository article [La97], excludes order . Planes exist for every prime-power order, the converse direction, which is not a claim about the question. With these the conjecture holds for , and order is the first undecided case. The formal-conjectures statement file, at the commit linked above, leaves the problem, its open variant asking whether a plane of order exists, and the solved variants it lists (prime-power orders, orders at most , the Bruck–Ryser condition) unproved and names no formal proof. Nothing was reconstructed in this corpus.
Search scope, 2026-10-07: the site's problem page and discussion thread, which record no proof claim, the community database entry, the formal-conjectures statement file, the Crossref records of [BrRy49] and [LTS89], and the two library cards.
Linked library material
These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.
- bruck_1949_nonexistence_certain_finite_projective_planes
- bruck_1949_nonexistence_certain_finite_projective_planes / theorem_1
- bruck_1949_nonexistence_certain_finite_projective_planes / theorem_2
- bruck_1949_nonexistence_certain_finite_projective_planes / theorem_3
- lam_1997_search_finite_projective_plane_order_10
- lam_1997_search_finite_projective_plane_order_10 / main_theorem
- lam_1997_search_finite_projective_plane_order_10 / theorem_2
- lam_1997_search_finite_projective_plane_order_10 / theorem_3