Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Problem 1027
claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 1027, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.
Statement. Let , and let be sufficiently large depending on . Suppose that is a family of at most many finite sets of size . Let .
Must there exist many sets which intersect every set in , yet contain none of them?
Status. Proved. The site marks the problem proved (page last edited 1 October 2025) and credits a proof posted in its comment thread by Koishi Chan on 21 September 2025; the claim page Koishi Chan 2025 records the result, accepted on the curator's credit.
Source. erdosproblems.com/1027, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #1027, https://www.erdosproblems.com/1027.
References.
- [Er64e] Erdős, P., On a combinatorial problem. II. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. (1964), 445-447. Library home: erdos_1964_combinatorial_problem.
- [Er71] Erdős, P., Some unsolved problems in graph theory and combinatorial analysis. Combinatorial Mathematics and its Applications (Proc. Conf., Oxford, 1969) (1971), 97-109. Library home: erdos_1971_unsolved_problems_graph_theory_combinatorial_analysis.
Formalization. The site records a formal-conjectures statement, not a proof. At its pinned commit, the file FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1027.lean is marked solved and names as its formal proof the lean-proofs development linked from the claim page, which the corpus has not built.
Current assessment
The site's formulation asks whether, for fixed and large, every family of at most sets of size has subsets of its union that meet every member and contain none. The answer is yes: [[problems/set_systems/E1027/claims/2025_09_21_koishichan|Koishi Chan's comment of 21 September 2025]] gives a random greedy partial coloring whose completions are counted by a martingale, with Beck's theorem on property B finishing the last vertices, and the site's curator credits it; the problem's standing derives from that accepted claim. The proof is a forum comment, amended on 24 September 2025 after a remark by Stijn Cambie on the normalization of the edge weights, and is not refereed. One such alone is a proper two-coloring of , that is, property B, the subject of Problem 901; the question here is the counting form.
Search scope, 2026-10-07: the site's page and discussion thread, the community
database (teorth/erdosproblems), the formal-conjectures catalog and the
lean-proofs catalog. No other claim on the problem was found. The claim page
links one third-party Lean proof, which the corpus has not built, so no
formalized evidence is listed.