Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

The half-edge target and rectangle approach


This page preserves an earlier research route and its local standing. The completed threshold proof is in the solution note.

The reduction and clique lemmas lead to the rectangle inequality below, whose general case remains open.

The half-edge formulation is equivalent

The requested threshold lower bound is equivalent to the following uniform asymptotic assertion:

r(G)≥e(G)2−o(n2)for every e(G)>t2(n).(1)r(G)\ge \frac{e(G)}2-o(n^2) \qquad\text{for every }e(G)>t_2(n). \tag{1}

Here r(G)r(G) denotes the number of colors in any coloring in which every seven-cycle is rainbow. This formulation is substantially weaker than the false full curve of Bucić, Chen and Ma, Theorem 1.2 (BCM) and than the stronger tentative bounds of the semidefinite approach (the squared-degree and 2e2/n22e^2/n^2 assertions) and the second-degree note (the oriented rectangle target).

To prove the nontrivial implication, let NN be the largest integer with t2(N)<e(G)t_2(N)<e(G). Then

n≤N≤2 n+O(1),N2=4e(G)+O(n).n\le N\le \sqrt2\,n+O(1),\qquad N^2=4e(G)+O(n).

Add N−nN-n isolated vertices and delete edges until exactly t2(N)+1t_2(N)+1 remain. Neither operation creates a new cycle or requires a new color. Applying the threshold lower bound on NN vertices gives

r(G)≥N2/8−o(N2)=e(G)/2−o(n2).r(G)\ge N^2/8-o(N^2)=e(G)/2-o(n^2).

The converse is immediate. Uniform error bounds transfer since N=O(n)N=O(n).

Thus a strict random-template example with q>1/4q>1/4 and ρ<q/2\rho<q/2 would also be a counterexample, even if ρ>1/8\rho>1/8: pad the resulting graphs with isolated vertices before deleting down to the new threshold. The random-blow-up formula supplies the coloring interpretation when its hypotheses hold.

Physical rectangles, not oriented incidences

Let AA be a fixed zero-one weighted template, with loops allowed, positive masses wiw_i summing to one, and edge density

q=12wTAw.q=\frac12 w^{\mathsf T}Aw.

Let HH be its three-walk relation: ij∈Hij\in H when (A3)ij>0(A^3)_{ij}>0. An admissible SS must be a clique including the diagonal conditions ii∈Hii\in H; in particular its vertices are triangular. For any template vertex pp, let

Fp(S)=e(N(p),S)=∑u∈N(p)wudS(u)−e(N(p)∩S),dS(u)=∑v∈SAuvwv.(2)F_p(S)=e(N(p),S) =\sum_{u\in N(p)}w_u d_S(u)-e(N(p)\cap S), \qquad d_S(u)=\sum_{v\in S}A_{uv}w_v . \tag{2}

Each physical edge is counted once, including the prescribed half-weight for a loop. There is no requirement that p∈Sp\in S.

The local path argument in local rainbow sets makes the corresponding rectangle rainbow after a linear-size pruning when the three-path condition is robust in an actual graph. Thus a natural sufficient uncolored assertion is

q>1/4⟹R:=max⁡p,SFp(S)≥1/8.(3)q>1/4\quad\Longrightarrow\quad R:=\max_{p,S}F_p(S)\ge1/8. \tag{3}

Equivalently, if valid uniformly for weighted templates, isolate padding would strengthen (3) to R≥q/2R\ge q/2 above the threshold. Neither assertion has been proved. A passage from a support statement to arbitrary graphs must also address robustness. The homomorphic-cleaning reduction supplies that missing general transfer: a universal template bound (3) would imply the weighted palette inequality and hence the original theorem. It does not prove (3).

The physical accounting in (2) is essential. For the five-type example in adaptive frames, at c=1/9c=1/9 all admissible sets lie in S={A,B,C}S=\{A,B,C\}, but

∥W1/2AV,SWS1/2∥op2=17+193162<14.\|W^{1/2}A_{V,S}W_S^{1/2}\|_{\rm op}^2 =\frac{17+\sqrt{193}}{162}<\frac14.

Indeed its Gram matrix is

181(102322103232325).\frac1{81}\begin{pmatrix} 10&2&3\sqrt2\\2&10&3\sqrt2\\3\sqrt2&3\sqrt2&5 \end{pmatrix}.

The physical rectangle anchored at AA nevertheless has mass (1+c)2/8>1/8(1+c)^2/8>1/8. Consequently a reduction to a column-submatrix norm at least 1/21/2, or to an oriented rectangle of mass at least 1/41/4, is false.

A proved Ore-heavy three-walk clique

Write d(x)=∑yAxywyd(x)=\sum_yA_{xy}w_y. Let S0S_0 consist of all endpoints of edges xaxa satisfying

d(x)+d(a)>1.(4)d(x)+d(a)>1. \tag{4}

Then S0S_0 is an admissible HH-clique.

For x,y∈S0x,y\in S_0, choose heavy edges xa,ybxa,yb. If there were no three-walk from xx to yy, then

N(a)∩N(y)=N(b)∩N(x)=∅.N(a)\cap N(y)=N(b)\cap N(x)=\varnothing.

Thus d(a)+d(y)≤1d(a)+d(y)\le1 and d(b)+d(x)≤1d(b)+d(x)\le1, contradicting the sum of the two heavy-edge inequalities. This argument also applies to x=yx=y, giving the required diagonal condition. Moreover q>1/4q>1/4 ensures that a heavy edge exists, because

∑uv∈Emuv(d(u)+d(v))=∑vwvd(v)2≥4q2>q.\sum_{uv\in E}m_{uv}(d(u)+d(v)) =\sum_vw_vd(v)^2\ge4q^2>q.

Here muv=wuwvm_{uv}=w_uw_v off the diagonal and muu=wu2/2m_{uu}=w_u^2/2.

One can also add every vertex with second degree s(y)=∑v∈N(y)wvd(v)>1/4s(y)=\sum_{v\in N(y)}w_vd(v)>1/4. The second-degree vertices are pairwise compatible by the second-degree argument. For compatibility with a heavy endpoint xx, a missing three-walk xyxy would imply

s(y)≤d(y)(1−d(x))≤(1−d(a))(1−d(x))<1/4,s(y)\le d(y)(1-d(x)) \le(1-d(a))(1-d(x))<1/4,

using N(a)∩N(y)=∅N(a)\cap N(y)=\varnothing and (4).

These are weighted-support lemmas. No claim is made that an individual heavy edge in an arbitrary finite graph gives robust three-paths.

Why a global enlargement is still needed

Take the triangular prism: two disjoint triangles joined by a perfect matching. Give each top vertex mass a=(1+t)/6a=(1+t)/6, and each bottom vertex mass b=(1−t)/6b=(1-t)/6, with t>0t>0 small. Then

q=3a2+3b2+3ab=14+t212.q=3a^2+3b^2+3ab=\frac14+\frac{t^2}{12}.

The top degrees are 1/2+t/61/2+t/6, and the bottom degrees are 1/2−t/61/2-t/6. Hence S0S_0 is exactly the top triangle. Its rectangles have masses

Fp(S0)={3a2+ab=(4+6t+2t2)/36,p top,2a2+2ab=(1+t)/9,p bottom.F_p(S_0)= \begin{cases} 3a^2+ab=(4+6t+2t^2)/36,&p\text{ top},\\ 2a^2+2ab=(1+t)/9,&p\text{ bottom}. \end{cases}

Their maximum is below 1/81/8 when 0<t<(10−3)/20<t<(\sqrt{10}-3)/2. For example, t=1/20t=1/20 gives q=1201/4800q=1201/4800 and maximum 287/2400<1/8287/2400<1/8. The second-degree enlargement also leaves only the top triangle for sufficiently small tt.

This does not disprove (3): the entire prism is an admissible three-walk clique. It shows precisely that selecting only the Ore-heavy endpoints, even with the second-degree enlargement, does not establish the desired bound. A suitable global enlargement or a different color certificate is still missing.

There is also a mass obstruction: super-Turan graphs can have ∣S0∣=4n/9<n/2|S_0|=4n/9<n/2. Thus the larger triangle-vertex mass theorem cannot be transferred even in its weak half-vertex form to the Ore-heavy endpoint set.

The two-star rectangles provide a larger admissible local family, a fixed-anchor optimization, and the unconditional high-density estimate R≥q(4q−1)R\ge q(4q-1). The desired threshold localization remains open.

A half-mass incident core is too strong

One possible sufficient shortcut would be a vertex set KK of mass at least 1/21/2 whose entire incident edge set is an active J23J_{23}-clique. It would give Φ≥q−e(V∖K)≥q−1/8\Phi\ge q-e(V\setminus K)\ge q-1/8. Such a set need not exist, even above the threshold.

Take the looped eight-cycle with cyclic weights

(24,24,24,24,1,1,1,1)/100.(24,24,24,24,1,1,1,1)/100.

Its density is 2933/10000>1/42933/10000>1/4. Define an auxiliary relation PP on vertices by declaring u,vu,v related exactly when every pair of distinct edge types incident to them conflicts; diagonal relations require the same property for one incident star. All types here are active. Then PP is precisely the looped eight-cycle.

Adjacent vertices are related: their joining edge is triangular, giving a two-walk between them, and any two other incident endpoints are joined by a three-walk through this edge. Diagonal relations hold because each vertex is triangular. Vertices at cyclic distance three or four are not related, since their loops have no two-walk connector. For vertices at distance two, the outward incident edges (i−1)i(i-1)i and (i+2)(i+3)(i+2)(i+3) are compatible: their two endpoint pairings have cyclic distances 2,42,4 and 3,33,3, respectively, neither allowing lengths two and three.

Thus every PP-clique has at most two adjacent types and mass at most 48/100<1/248/100<1/2. This rules out the stated half-mass incident-core shortcut, not the physical-rectangle conjecture. The triangular-support theorem already proves the required palette bound for this example.