Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Triangle averages and nontriangular edge types


This page preserves an earlier research route and its local standing. The completed threshold proof is in the solution note.

The weak average inequality holds for q≥5/16q\ge5/16. The lower-density range and the general color-localization step remain the targets of this approach to the half-edge inequality.

Let AA be a zero-one weighted template, with loops allowed and total weight one. Let ZZ be all triangular types and U=V∖ZU=V\setminus Z. Write d=Awd=A w, s=AWds=A Wd, q=wTAw/2q=w^{\mathsf T}Aw/2, and

T=16tr⁡((WA)3).T=\frac16\operatorname{tr}((WA)^3).

These are weighted walk densities; a loop is interpreted through a clique blow-up. All triangles lie in ZZ.

Average and the open inequality

With physical edges counted once,

E:=∑pwpe(N(p),Z)=∑z∈Zwzs(z)−3T=∑vwvd(v)2−∑u∈Uwus(u)−3T.(1)\mathcal E:=\sum_p w_p e(N(p),Z) =\sum_{z\in Z}w_zs(z)-3T =\sum_v w_vd(v)^2-\sum_{u\in U}w_us(u)-3T. \tag{1}

Indeed, averaging the oriented rectangle counts gives ∑Zwzs(z)\sum_Zw_zs(z); the overlap corrections sum to 3T3T.

The proposed quantitative inequality is

q>1/4⟹?E≥2q2.(2)q>1/4\quad\stackrel{?}{\Longrightarrow}\quad \mathcal E\ge2q^2 . \tag{2}

It is proved when U=∅U=\varnothing: then 3T≤12∑vwvd(v)23T\le\frac12\sum_vw_vd(v)^2, so Cauchy--Schwarz proves (2). The general case remains open in these notes.

If all of ZZ is a three-walk clique, the maximum physical rectangle is at least E\mathcal E, making (2) a sufficient color certificate in the applicable robust-path setting. If ZZ is not such a clique, one cannot use (1) as a color lower bound. Thus even a proof of (2) would leave a localization step in the general problem.

Reducing the nontriangular support to five types

For testing (2), fix the support and weights on ZZ, the total UU-weight, and the density qq. If three positive-weight types in UU are pairwise nonadjacent, both qq and E\mathcal E are affine in their three weights, with all other weights fixed. For qq, this follows because there are no edges among them. For E\mathcal E, use the first expression in (1): its two non-ZZ positions in a two-walk must be consecutive, so a term involving two of the moving types would require an edge between them. The triangle term is unchanged.

There is therefore a nonzero direction in these three weights preserving their sum and qq. Choose its sign not to increase E\mathcal E, and move until a weight becomes zero. Repeating preserves qq, preserves all triangles on ZZ, and does not increase E\mathcal E.

At termination, the remaining UU-support is triangle-free with no independent set of size three, and hence has at most five types. Indeed each vertex has at most two neighbors, and its nonneighbors form a clique of size at most two. With five types every degree is two, so the support is C5C_5.

This is a reduction for the proposed average inequality, not a reduction of arbitrary colored graphs or of the original physical-rectangle maximum.

A triangle-count refinement

Let A1,…,AkA_1,\ldots,A_k be disjoint independent subsets of ZZ. For each v∈Zv\in Z, pairs of its neighbors lying in one AiA_i cannot contribute edges. Thus

3T≤12∑v∈Zwv(dZ(v)2−∑idAi(v)2).3T\le\frac12\sum_{v\in Z}w_v \left(d_Z(v)^2-\sum_i d_{A_i}(v)^2\right).

Writing integrals for weighted sums gives

E≥12∫ZdZ2+12∑i∫ZdAi2+∫ZdUdZ+∫UdZ2+∫UdUdZ.(3)\begin{split} \mathcal E\ge{}& \frac12\int_Z d_Z^2+ \frac12\sum_i\int_Z d_{A_i}^2+ \int_Z d_Ud_Z\\ &+\int_U d_Z^2+\int_U d_Ud_Z . \end{split} \tag{3}

For any edge uvuv in UU, one may take A1=N(u)∩ZA_1=N(u)\cap Z and A2=N(v)∩ZA_2=N(v)\cap Z: these sets are independent and disjoint because no triangle meets UU. No averaging or selection of these sets proving (2) was found.

The five-type family

Use vertices U1,U2,A,B,CU_1,U_2,A,B,C, with masses u,v,a,b,c>0u,v,a,b,c>0 summing to one, edges

U1U2, U1A, U2B, AB, AC, BC,U_1U_2,\ U_1A,\ U_2B,\ AB,\ AC,\ BC,

and a loop at CC. Put z=a+b+cz=a+b+c, h=u+v=1−zh=u+v=1-z. Direct expansion of (1) gives

E=zq−cuv.(4)\mathcal E=zq-cuv. \tag{4}

For q>1/4q>1/4, the capacity calculation from triangle-vertex mass gives, with δ=z−1/2>0\delta=z-1/2>0,

q≤14+cδ−c24≤14+δ2,c<4δ.q\le\frac14+c\delta-\frac{c^2}{4} \le\frac14+\delta^2,\qquad c<4\delta.

Consequently h<1/2h<1/2 and

z−2q≥2δh,cuvq≤ch24q<4δh2<2δh.z-2q\ge2\delta h,\qquad \frac{cuv}{q}\le\frac{ch^2}{4q}<4\delta h^2<2\delta h.

Together with (4) this proves E>2q2\mathcal E>2q^2 in this family. Completing arbitrary missing edges is not known to preserve the desired average inequality, so this is not a proof for arbitrary two-UU-type supports.

A universal bound in the denser range

For every template with q>1/4q>1/4,

E≥32q−38+14q−14.(5)\mathcal E\ge \frac32q-\frac38+\frac14\sqrt{q-\frac14}. \tag{5}

In particular E≥q/2\mathcal E\ge q/2 for every q≥5/16q\ge5/16. This is a universal statement about the average, not an assumption that all triangular vertices form a three-walk clique.

To prove it, put H=∫d2−3TH=\int d^2-3T, and let pip_i be the probability that three independently sampled weighted vertices induce exactly ii of the three possible edges. Repeated types are interpreted through their clique blow-ups. Then

q=p1+2p2+3p36,H=p23+p32,q=\frac{p_1+2p_2+3p_3}{6},\qquad H=\frac{p_2}{3}+\frac{p_3}{2},

so

H−32q+14=p04+p212≥0.H-\frac32q+\frac14=\frac{p_0}{4}+\frac{p_2}{12}\ge0.

For u∈Uu\in U, its neighborhood is independent. Every neighbor vv therefore has d(v)≤1−d(u)d(v)\le1-d(u), and

s(u)≤d(u)(1−d(u))≤1/4.s(u)\le d(u)(1-d(u))\le1/4.

Using (1) and the triangle-vertex mass bound,

E≥32q−14−w(U)4≥32q−38+14q−14,\mathcal E\ge\frac32q-\frac14-\frac{w(U)}4 \ge\frac32q-\frac38+\frac14\sqrt{q-\frac14},

as claimed. The last expression is at least q/2q/2 exactly when q≥5/16q\ge5/16.

A degree-reweighted triangle-mass consequence

Write a=e(Z)a=e(Z), b=e(Z,U)b=e(Z,U), c=e(U)c=e(U), so q=a+b+cq=a+b+c. For every q>1/4q>1/4,

a−c≥q4q−1>0.(6)a-c\ge q\sqrt{4q-1}>0. \tag{6}

Reweight vertex ii by wid(i)w_i d(i). The new total mass is 2q2q, and the new edge mass satisfies

qd=12∑ijwiwjAijd(i)d(j)≥4q3.q_d=\frac12\sum_{ij}w_iw_jA_{ij}d(i)d(j)\ge4q^3.

For completeness, give an oriented edge ijij probability wiwjAij/(2q)w_iw_jA_{ij}/(2q). Its marginal is wid(i)/(2q)w_i d(i)/(2q). Convexity of xlog⁡xx\log x gives

Elog⁡d(i)≥log⁡(2q),\mathbb E\log d(i)\ge\log(2q),

and Jensen's inequality then gives E[d(i)d(j)]≥(2q)2\mathbb E[d(i)d(j)]\ge(2q)^2, proving the bound on qdq_d. Zero-degree vertices have zero marginal probability and can be omitted.

The triangular mass under the new weighting is 2a+b2a+b. The homogeneous triangle-vertex mass theorem applies because qd>q2=(2q)2/4q_d>q^2=(2q)^2/4, and gives

2a+b≥q+qd−q2≥q+q4q−1.2a+b\ge q+\sqrt{q_d-q^2} \ge q+q\sqrt{4q-1}.

Subtracting q=a+b+cq=a+b+c proves (6).

Neither (5) nor (6) resolves the remaining interval 1/4<q<5/161/4<q<5/16, or provides color localization when ZZ is not a three-walk clique.

A tempting stronger intermediate bound E≥12∫d2\mathcal E\ge\frac12\int d^2 is false even above the threshold: a clique of mass 0.70.7 and a disjoint balanced bipartite component of mass 0.30.3 give

q=0.2675,E=0.1715,12∫d2=0.174875.q=0.2675,\qquad \mathcal E=0.1715,\qquad \tfrac12\int d^2=0.174875.

This example does not contradict (2).

Independent nontriangular types and full three-walk connectivity

There is a further proved restricted color bound. Suppose all triangular types ZZ form an admissible three-walk clique, and U=V∖ZU=V\setminus Z is independent. Then the largest physical rectangle satisfies

R:=max⁡pe(N(p),Z)≥2q2.R:=\max_p e(N(p),Z)\ge2q^2.

Indeed, put z=w(Z)z=w(Z), u=w(U)u=w(U), a=e(Z)a=e(Z), b=e(Z,U)b=e(Z,U). Averaging anchors only over ZZ, with all physical edges counted once, gives

zR≥∫ZdZ2−3T+∫UdZ2≥2a2z+b2u.zR\ge\int_Zd_Z^2-3T+\int_Ud_Z^2 \ge\frac{2a^2}{z}+\frac{b^2}{u}.

The triangle bound is 3T≤12∫ZdZ23T\le\tfrac12\int_Zd_Z^2. Cauchy--Schwarz now gives

R≥2a2z2+b2zu≥(a+b)2z2/2+zu=2q21−u2≥2q2.R\ge\frac{2a^2}{z^2}+\frac{b^2}{zu} \ge\frac{(a+b)^2}{z^2/2+zu} =\frac{2q^2}{1-u^2}\ge2q^2.

If u=0u=0, use the first term alone. More generally, without independence of UU, the identical proof gives

R≥2(q−e(U))21−u2,R\ge\frac{2(q-e(U))^2}{1-u^2},

still assuming all of ZZ is an admissible three-walk clique. This does not handle arbitrary UU or the missing localization when the triangular types do not form one such clique.

The case where UU consists of two adjacent types is settled in two nontriangular types: its full-support uncolored average satisfies E≥2q2\mathcal E\ge2q^2 for q>1/4q>1/4. The proof has an explicit sum-of-squares symmetrization and two nonnegative Bernstein expansions. It does not cover the other supports left by the five-type reduction.

An equivalent boundary formulation

The full average conjecture (2) is equivalent to the following still-unproved assertion:

q=1/4 and a positive triangle exists⟹E≥1/8.(7)q=1/4\text{ and a positive triangle exists} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \mathcal E\ge1/8. \tag{7}

This equivalence does not remove the color-localization gap.

First, every weighting in (7) is a limit of positive weightings on the same support with q>1/4q>1/4. If two degrees differ, transfer a small amount of weight toward the higher-degree type. Otherwise all degrees equal 1/21/2. Choose a probability weighting vv on a triangle with q(v)≥1/3q(v)\ge1/3; a loop, if present, permits q(v)=1/2q(v)=1/2. Then

q((1−t)w+tv)=1/4+t2(q(v)−1/4)>1/4(0<t<1).q((1-t)w+tv)=1/4+t^2(q(v)-1/4)>1/4\qquad(0<t<1).

Continuity proves (7) from (2).

Conversely, fix the weights on ZZ. Along a transfer between two nonadjacent UU-types, qq and E\mathcal E are affine. Thus E−2q2\mathcal E-2q^2 is concave. On the interval where the weights are nonnegative and q≥1/4q\ge1/4, an endpoint has no larger value. An endpoint either has q=1/4q=1/4, when (7) applies, or deletes a UU-type. Triangles in ZZ are unchanged. Iterating reduces to a clique of at most two UU-types. The adjacent-pair theorem handles two types. A single type follows by adjoining a second nontriangular type of vanishing weight adjacent only to the first and taking a limit in that theorem. The U=∅U=\varnothing case was proved directly above. Hence a negative value of E−2q2\mathcal E-2q^2 cannot survive this reduction.

For clarity, every weighting in (7) has w(Z)>1/2w(Z)>1/2. In the triangle-mass symmetrization, keeping ZZ fixed, the bound is

q≤1/4+c(z−1/2)−c2/4.q\le1/4+c(z-1/2)-c^2/4.

If z≤1/2z\le1/2 and q=1/4q=1/4, equality forces c=0c=0. The unchanged ZZ-support would then be covered by the two independent neighborhoods of the surviving nontriangular types, contradicting its positive triangle.

Removing the four-cycle from the finite-support reduction

Suppose UU is complete bipartite, with positive side masses r,sr,s. Keep both side masses and the ZZ-weights fixed. Put ai=dZ(i)a_i=d_Z(i), bi=∫NZ(i)dZb_i=\int_{N_Z(i)}d_Z, and C=∫ZdZ2−3TC=\int_Zd_Z^2-3T. Then

q=e(Z)+rs+∑i∈Uwiai,E=C+∑i∈Uwi(bi+ai2)+s∑i∈Lwiai+r∑i∈Rwiai.\begin{aligned} q&=e(Z)+rs+\sum_{i\in U}w_i a_i,\\ \mathcal E&=C+\sum_{i\in U}w_i(b_i+a_i^2) +s\sum_{i\in L}w_i a_i+r\sum_{i\in R}w_i a_i . \end{aligned}

Both are affine in within-side redistributions. With at least four positive UU-types, the two side-mass constraints and the density constraint leave a nonzero direction. Choose its sign not to increase E\mathcal E, and move to delete a type. Thus this case reduces to at most three UU-types.

In particular, after the five-type reduction above, the C4C_4 case can be removed. Apart from the settled cases, the remaining uncolored-average supports can be taken as

2K1,P3,K2⊔K1,2K2,P4,C5.2K_1,\quad P_3,\quad K_2\sqcup K_1,\quad 2K_2,\quad P_4,\quad C_5.

These reductions do not prove (7) or the general average inequality.