Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Erdos 1982 problems additive number theory

../

problem_p114: Erdős asks for the largest value g(N) of binom(k_1,2) + binom(k_2,2) over two sequences whose differences, taken together, are all distinct, records binom(f(N),2) <= g(N) < (1+o(1))N/2, and asks in (5) whether g(N) < binom(f(N),2) + O(1).

theorem_p114: Erdős's theorem that if sequences A_1, ..., A_m have all their differences distinct and in [1,N], with pairwise disjoint difference sets, then for every eps > 0 there is eta > 0 such that, for N > N_0(eps, eta), |D| > (1+eps)N/2 forces m > eta N.


Erdős, P., Some problems on additive number theory. Annals of Discrete Mathematics 12 (Theory and Practice of Combinatorics), 113--116, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(08)73496-0

Erdős opens (p. 113) with the Erdős–Turán conjecture (1) that the largest Sidon set in {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} has size f(n)=n1/2+O(1)f(n)=n^{1/2}+O(1), recalling the known bounds (2) n1/2−n1/2−c<f(n)<n1/2+n1/4+1n^{1/2}-n^{1/2-c}<f(n)<n^{1/2}+n^{1/4}+1 and his prize offer. He then recalls perfect systems of difference sets (p. 113) and Abrham's bound m>αNm>\alpha N for them. His main Theorem (p. 114) concerns systems A1,…,AmA_1,\ldots,A_m of integer sequences whose differences (4) are all distinct and all lie in [1,N][1,N], with pairwise disjoint difference sets DiD_i: for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is η>0\eta>0 such that, for N>N0(ε,η)N>N_0(\varepsilon,\eta), if ∣D∣>(1+ε)N/2|D|>(1+\varepsilon)N/2 then m>ηNm>\eta N, so a large difference set needs many component sequences. The proof (pp. 114--115) adapts the Erdős–Turán counting argument, and pp. 115--116 sketch how Abrham's bound follows from the Theorem. On p. 114 he asks for g(N)=max⁡((k12)+(k22))g(N)=\max\bigl(\binom{k_1}{2}+\binom{k_2}{2}\bigr) over two sequences in [1,n][1,n] whose differences, taken together, are all distinct, notes that the Theorem gives g(N)<(1+o(1))N/2g(N)<(1+o(1))N/2 and that trivially g(N)≥(f(N)2)g(N)\ge\binom{f(N)}{2}, asks whether (5) g(N)<(f(N)2)+O(1)g(N)<\binom{f(N)}{2}+O(1), and asks whether max⁡(k1+k2−f(N))→∞\max(k_1+k_2-f(N))\to\infty.

Source: https://users.renyi.hu/~p_erdos/Erdos.html. The file prints "© North-Holland Publishing Company" in the header of its first page (p. 113), every other right reserved.

Bears on. #43: question (5) of the Problem (p. 114) is the problem's first question, since two sequences whose differences are all distinct are two Sidon sets A,BA,B with (A−A)∩(B−B)={0}(A-A)\cap(B-B)=\{0\}; the problem's second question, the case ∣A∣=∣B∣|A|=|B|, is not in this paper. The paper poses (5) and does not resolve it; the Theorem gives only the upper bound g(N)<(1+o(1))N/2g(N)<(1+o(1))N/2.

Results.

  • Theorem (p. 114): if the differences (4) of A1,…,AmA_1,\ldots,A_m are all distinct and in [1,N][1,N] and the DiD_i are pairwise disjoint, then for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is η>0\eta>0 such that, for N>N0(ε,η)N>N_0(\varepsilon,\eta), ∣D∣>(1+ε)N/2|D|>(1+\varepsilon)N/2 implies m>ηNm>\eta N; the page also records the deduction of Abrham's bound (pp. 115--116).
  • Problem and question (5) (p. 114): estimate g(N)g(N); the paper records (f(N)2)≤g(N)<(1+o(1))N/2\binom{f(N)}{2}\le g(N)<(1+o(1))N/2, asks whether g(N)<(f(N)2)+O(1)g(N)<\binom{f(N)}{2}+O(1), and asks whether max⁡(k1+k2−f(N))→∞\max(k_1+k_2-f(N))\to\infty.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.