Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Berlekamp 1968 construction partitions which avoid long arithmetic

../

theorem_1: Berlekamp's general bound: for a prime power k and an integer W at most t(k^t - 1)/(k^d - 1) for each proper divisor d of t and at most t(k^t - 1)/D for each divisor D < t of k^t - 1, some partition of W consecutive integers into k sets has no (t+1)-term progression, so W(k,t) > W.

theorem_2: Berlekamp's two-class bound: for prime t some partition of t 2^t consecutive integers into two sets has no (t+1)-term progression; in Problem 138's notation, W(p+1) > p 2^p for prime p.


Berlekamp, E. R., A construction for partitions which avoid long arithmetic progressions. Canad. Math. Bull. 11 (1968), no. 3, 409-414.

Berlekamp studies W(k,t), the least m such that every partition of m consecutive integers into k classes puts a (t+1)-term arithmetic progression inside one class. Theorem 1 states that if k is a prime power and the integer W satisfies W <= t(k^t-1)/(k^d-1) for every proper divisor d of t and W <= t(k^t-1)/D for every divisor D<t of k^t-1, then W(k,t)>W; the proof (pp. 410-412) colors each i in 0, ..., W-1 by the first coordinate of alpha^i in a basis of GF(k^t) over GF(k), alpha a primitive element, and shows that no color class contains t+1 terms in arithmetic progression. Theorem 2 sharpens this for two classes: for every prime t, W(2,t) > t 2^t, an improvement on the earlier nonconstructive bounds of Erdos-Rado (W(k,t) >= (2t k^t)^(1/2)) and Schmidt. The paper notes the bound is weak for small t (it gives only W(2,3)>24, versus Folkman's quadratic-residue construction giving W(2,3)>34) and that L. Moser's construction, W(k,t) > t k^(c log k), remains the best known for small t and large k, while Theorem 1 at the next smaller prime, with W(k,t) at most W(k,t+1), is the best known for small k and large t. This bears on Erdos problem 138 (improving bounds for the van der Waerden numbers W(k), where Berlekamp's t 2^t construction is the classical lower bound for two colors) and on problem 169, which compares the reciprocal-sum function f(k) for progression-free sets to log W(k) and so depends on such lower bounds.

Source: https://doi.org/10.4153/CMB-1968-047-7. The copy read for this card is the publisher's scan of the printed article (6 pages, printed pp. 409-414), whose footer prints only "Published online by Cambridge University Press" with the DOI; the publisher's article page (https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0008439500056629/type/journal_article, read 2026-10-02) shows "Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1968" and names no license, every other right reserved.

Read status. Claims checked: Theorems 1 and 2 (pp. 409-410) and their proofs (pp. 410-413) were read clause by clause on the page images; the proofs' steps were followed but not independently re-derived, and the example table of Section 3 (pp. 413-414) was not recomputed.

Bears on.

  • #138: Theorem 2 gives W(p+1)>p 2pW(p+1)>p\,2^p for prime pp in the problem's notation, one of the bounds the site's commentary cites as the record the problem asks to improve; it does not show W(k)1/k→∞W(k)^{1/k}\to\infty.
  • #169: through the elementary comparison f(k)≥12log⁡W(k)f(k)\ge\frac12\log W(k), Theorem 2 gives the linear lower bound f(k)≥(log⁡22−o(1))kf(k)\ge(\frac{\log2}{2}-o(1))k recorded on that problem's Berlekamp claim page; the paper states nothing about reciprocal sums.
  • #187: context only. Beck's 1980 paper cites this paper for the bound on the longest monochromatic progression guaranteed in every two-colouring of {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\}; the theorems say nothing about progression length as a function of the difference, which is what the problem asks.

Results.

  • Theorem 1 (p. 409): if kk is a prime power and Wˇ\check W satisfies Wˇ≤t(kt−1)/(kd−1)\check W\le t(k^t-1)/(k^d-1) for all proper divisors dd of tt and Wˇ≤t(kt−1)/D\check W\le t(k^t-1)/D for all divisors D<tD<t of kt−1k^t-1, then W(k,t)>WˇW(k,t)>\check W; proved by a GF(kt)GF(k^t) construction.
  • Theorem 2 (p. 410): if tt is prime, W(2,t)>t2tW(2,t)>t2^t.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.