Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 138

../

claims/: The 5 claim pages of Problem 138, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let the van der Waerden number W(k)W(k) be such that whenever N≥W(k)N\geq W(k) and {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} is 22-coloured there must exist a monochromatic kk-term arithmetic progression. Improve the bounds for W(k)W(k) - for example, prove that W(k)1/k→∞W(k)^{1/k}\to \infty.

Formulation. The request to improve the bounds is read against the bounds the site's commentary cites as the current records: Berlekamp's W(p+1)≥p2pW(p+1)\ge p2^p for primes pp [Be68], Gowers's tower upper bound [Go01] and Kozik and Shabanov's W(k)≫2kW(k)\gg2^k [KoSh16]. The site credits them as the known bounds and labels the problem OPEN. They are the baseline the request asks to beat, and they settle none of the questions the problem and its commentary pose. The formal-conjectures file linked under Formalization restates Berlekamp's and Gowers's bounds as solved variants (erdos_138.variants.prime, erdos_138.variants.upper) with no formal proof.

Status. OPEN, the site's label (page last edited 2 June 2026).

Source. erdosproblems.com/138, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #138, https://www.erdosproblems.com/138.

References.

  • [Be68] Berlekamp, E. R., A construction for partitions which avoid long arithmetic progressions. Canad. Math. Bull. 11 (1968), no. 3, 409-414.
  • [Er80] Erdős, Paul, A survey of problems in combinatorial number theory. Ann. Discrete Math. (1980), 89-115.
  • [Er81] Erdős, P., On the combinatorial problems which I would most like to see solved. Combinatorica (1981), 25-42.
  • [FoHu26] J. Fox and Z. Hunter, Three-color van der Waerden numbers grow super-exponentially. arXiv:2606.02541 (2026).
  • [Go01] Gowers, W. T., A new proof of Szemerédi's theorem. Geom. Funct. Anal. (2001), 465-588.
  • [KoSh16] Kozik, Jakub and Shabanov, Dmitry, Improved algorithms for colorings of simple hypergraphs and applications. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B (2016), 312-332.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures at its commit of 2026-10-06, linked, which states the question W(k)1/k→∞W(k)^{1/k}\to\infty as erdos_138 with answer(sorry) and a sorry body and no formal_proof attribute; two of its variants, W(k+1)−W(k)→∞W(k+1)-W(k)\to\infty and W(k)/2k→∞W(k)/2^k\to\infty, are marked solved with formal_proof attributes pointing to Lean files outside the repository: a proof by the DeepMind prover agent (Tsoukalas et al., arXiv:2605.22763) in a fork of formal-conjectures, and a Lean proof derived from the Atlas proofs of facebookresearch/atlas-lean. Neither was built by this corpus, neither is a formalization of the accepted OpenAI claim under Claims, and each is linked from its claim page.

Claims. Five results have claim pages. The OpenAI mathematics release of 23 September 2026 proves Wr(k)>kk⌊log⁡2r⌋/100000W_r(k)>k^{k\lfloor\log_2r\rfloor/100000} for every r≥2r\ge2 and every kk above an absolute threshold, so W(k)1/k→∞W(k)^{1/k}\to\infty, the example question the problem names; the result is accepted as a partial claim on its claim page, on Lean declarations this corpus built and audited, and the open-ended request to improve the bounds stays open, with no upper bound touched. Four further results on the questions the site's entry records are claimed on their own pages: Campos, Fox and Schildkraut's lower bound W(k)≥(1−o(1))k2k−1W(k)\ge(1-o(1))k2^{k-1}, which also gives W(k)/2k→∞W(k)/2^k\to\infty (claim page); a Lean proof of W(k)/2k→∞W(k)/2^k\to\infty in Meta's atlas-lean repository (claim page); the DeepMind prover agent's W(k+1)≥W(k)+kW(k+1)\ge W(k)+k, which answers the difference question of [Er81] (claim page); and the notes that Nat Sothanaphan linked from the site's thread on 2026-04-10, written with GPT-5.4 Thinking, which refine the difference bound to Wr(k+1)−Wr(k)≥k+min⁡(k,F(r))+1W_r(k+1)-W_r(k)\ge k+\min(k,F(r))+1 for rr colors with an explicit F(r)=Θ(rlog⁡log⁡r)F(r)=\Theta(r\log\log r); at r=2r=2 this is W(k+1)−W(k)≥k+1W(k+1)-W(k)\ge k+1 (claim page). The record bounds named under Formulation have no claim pages; the results that improve them do. Fox and Hunter's W3(k)1/k≥Clog⁡∗kW_3(k)^{1/k}\ge C^{\log_*k} [FoHu26] concerns three colors, not the problem's two-color number, and has no page.

Progress

Not yet compiled.

Known Results

Not yet compiled.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.