Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Theorem 1.1 of the exposition (p. 1) reads: "If and , then there is a finite bipartite graph such that ."
Explicitly, after choosing , one can choose a single , constants , and an integer such that
The graph and constants may depend on ; the graph does not depend on . There is no claim of a uniform graph size or constants over all rational exponents. The endpoint is excluded.
Proof
The rational number belongs to . Write it as with positive integers . For example, its reduced positive numerator and denominator have these properties. Lemma 5.1 supplies a rooted model for .
By Proposition 2.1, there is one integer for which . The model has the matching upper bound for every positive power, hence for this same . Proposition 2.2 therefore gives a finite bipartite graph with . Relabel its finite vertex set by if desired; copy exclusion and the extremal function are unchanged by isomorphism.
For , the parameter pair may be ; the same model argument applies. This endpoint also follows directly from , whose extremal number is : its avoiding graphs have maximum degree at most one, and a matching attains that edge count. This confirms the two-sided endpoint without relying on the zero upper bound for the one-edge first power of the base model.
Source and evidence
Exposition, Theorem 1.1, p. 1,
with the concluding proof on p. 7.
The pinned formal statements are UniversalHubModels.result, lines
10349–10369, and Erdos571.erdos_571, lines 10382–10388, at commit
661cc1d842c54661f55046d27abef531d0583b1e of
tadamcz/erdos571.
The formal conclusion has exactly the quantifier order above and uses one
bipartite graph on a finite vertex set, with an IsTheta assertion as
.
The detailed proofs linked here reconstruct the essential mathematical steps from the preliminary PDF and the pinned public Lean source. Public CI evidence and named site acceptance are recorded separately in the source record. No new local Lean build or certificate replay was performed for this compilation; the corpus's later build of the pinned commit is recorded on the claim page. Its author is not claiming that the anonymous PDF itself contains all the detailed proofs, nor that public CI replaces independent review of this reconstruction.
Bears on. #571.