Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Balogh 2025 packing edge disjoint cliques graphs

../


József Balogh and Michael C. Wigal, Packing edge disjoint cliques in graphs, arXiv:2502.16683v2 [math.CO], 14 September 2025 (dateline "September 16, 2025" on p. 1; the arXiv comment "Updated with referees' suggestions" and the referee acknowledgment on p. 10), 11 pages; Combinatorica 45 (2025), no. 5, article 56 (published online 14 October 2025), doi:10.1007/s00493-025-00184-w (Crossref record read; the arXiv record carried no journal reference on 2026-09-18, and the journal text is not held and was not compared). Not a source key of the site; Problems 1009 and 1017 cite it as [BaWi25].

The copy read for this card is the arXiv copy of v2: eleven pages with a complete text layer, PDF page equal to printed page, at https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16683v2. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:2502.16683), every other right reserved.

Read status: claims checked for the abstract, Theorems 1.1--1.3 and the account of Erdős's cost question (p. 1), Conjecture 1.4 and Theorems 1.5--1.8 (p. 2), and Section 4's concluding remarks with the definition of ϕr(n,k)\phi_r(n,k), the statement of Győri's exact ranges, the Győri--Keszegh sentence and the K4K_4 example (p. 10), read clause by clause in the text layer and, for p. 10, on the page image; the derivation of Conjecture 1.4 from Theorem 1.8 (p. 3) was read for structure; the proofs (Sections 2--3, pp. 3--9) were not read; the reference list (pp. 10--11) was read for [1], [2], [5], [7]--[10], [16] and [17].

Contents

  • Notation (p. 1): tr(n)t_r(n) the number of edges of the Turán graph with rr parts; νr(G)\nu_r(G) the maximum number of edge-disjoint rr-cliques (p. 2); νr∗(G)\nu_r^*(G) its fractional analog.
  • Theorem 1.1 (Erdős--Goodman--Pósa for r=3r=3; Bollobás for r≥4r\ge4), p. 1: the edges of a graph are covered by at most tr−1(n)t_{r-1}(n) rr-cliques and edges. Theorem 1.2 (Győri--Kostochka, Chung, Kahn): π(G)≤2t2(n)\pi(G)\le2t_2(n) when an rr-clique costs rr. Erdős's question (p. 1, "see [17, Problem 43] or [9]"): with cost r−1r-1 per rr-clique, can the edges be decomposed at total cost at most t2(n)t_2(n)? "shown to hold asymptotically" in their [1] (arXiv:2412.05522). Theorem 1.3 (Győri--Tuza): πr(G)≤2tr−1(n)\pi_r(G)\le2t_{r-1}(n) for r≥4r\ge4.
  • Conjecture 1.4 (Győri [8, 9], Tuza [17]), p. 2: for fixed r≥3r\ge3 and e(G)=tr−1(n)+ke(G)=t_{r-1}(n)+k, νr(G)≥(2−o(1))k/r\nu_r(G)\ge(2-o(1))k/r. Theorem 1.5 (Král', Lidický, Martins, Pehova): the case r=3r=3, π3(G)≤(1/2+o(1))n2\pi_3(G)\le(1/2+o(1))n^2; the sharp bound π3(G)≤n2/2+1\pi_3(G)\le n^2/2+1 of Blumenthal et al., for all sufficiently large nn (their [2], filed as blumenthal_2021_sharp_bounds_decomposing_graphs_edges_triangles). Theorem 1.6 (Győri [8]): for fixed r≥3r\ge3 and k=o(n2)k=o(n^2), νr(G)≥k−O(k2/n2)=(1−o(1))k\nu_r(G)\ge k-O(k^2/n^2)=(1-o(1))k; [8] is Győri, Combinatorica 11 (1991), 231--243.
  • Theorem 1.8 (p. 2), the main result: for r≥3r\ge3 and e(G)=(1−1r−1)n22+ke(G)=(1-\frac1{r-1})\frac{n^2}2+k, νr∗(G)≥2k/r\nu_r^*(G)\ge2k/r; with the Haxell--Rödl theorem (Theorem 1.7) and Theorem 1.6 this gives Conjecture 1.4 (p. 3).
  • Concluding remarks (p. 10): ϕr(n,k)=min⁡νr(G)\phi_r(n,k)=\min\nu_r(G) over nn-vertex graphs with tr−1(n)+kt_{r-1}(n)+k edges; ϕr(n,k)≥(2−o(1))k/r\phi_r(n,k)\ge(2-o(1))k/r, sharp at the Turán graph and at KnK_n; ϕr(n,k)=(1−o(1))k\phi_r(n,k)=(1-o(1))k for k=o(n2)k=o(n^2); Győri [8]: ϕr(n,k)=k\phi_r(n,k)=k for r≥4r\ge4, large nn and k≤3⌊n+1r−1⌋−5k\le3\lfloor\frac{n+1}{r-1}\rfloor-5. For r=3r=3 the paper traces the problem of determining ϕ3(n,k)\phi_3(n,k) to Erdős [5] and states Győri's exact range from [7], "see [9] for minor correction": "ϕ3(n,k)=k\phi_3(n,k)=k if k≤2n−10k\le2n-10 when nn is odd or if k≤1.5n−5k\le1.5n-5 when nn is even". It then describes a "very precise" result of Győri and Keszegh [10]: every K4K_4-free graph with n2/4+kn^2/4+k edges, where k≤n2/12k\le n^2/12, has kk triangles, no two sharing an edge. The example after it: three classes AA, BB, CC with G[A]G[A] complete and G[A∪C,B]G[A\cup C,B] complete bipartite has fewer than (1−o(1))k(1-o(1))k triangles once k>17n2/169>n2/12k>17n^2/169>n^2/12, so "the K4K_4-freeness is important"; the range of kk with ϕr(n,k)=(1−o(1))k\phi_r(n,k)=(1-o(1))k is left open.
  • References (pp. 10--11): [5] Erdős, Some unsolved problems in graph theory and combinatorial analysis, Oxford 1969, 1971, 97--109 (the site's Er71); [7] Győri, On the number of edge disjoint triangles in graphs of given size, Combinatorics (Eger, 1987), 1988, 267--276 (the site's Gy88); [9] Győri, Edge disjoint cliques in graphs, Sets, graphs, and numbers (Budapest 1991), 1992, 357--363; [10] Győri and Keszegh, Combinatorica 37 (2017), 1113--1124 (filed as gyori_2017_number_edge_disjoint_triangles_k_4_free_graphs); [17] Tuza, Unsolved combinatorial problems, Part I, BRICS Lecture Series LS-01-1, 2001.

Compiled scope

Statements at claims-checked depth for pp. 1--2 and 10; the reduction on p. 3 read for structure; no proof was checked and nothing here is independently reviewed. The copy read is the arXiv v2; the journal text was not compared. Győri's 1988, 1991 and 1992 papers are not held, and their statements are consumed here through this paper's restatements.

Bears on. #1017: the paper proves Győri's conjecture (Conjecture 1.4 through Theorem 1.8, pp. 2--3): every nn-vertex graph with tr−1(n)+kt_{r-1}(n)+k edges has (2−o(1))k/r(2-o(1))k/r edge-disjoint rr-cliques; p. 1 recalls Erdős's cost question and its asymptotic resolution in arXiv:2412.05522; p. 10 (= PDF p. 10, page image) states the Győri--Keszegh theorem for K4K_4-free graphs and shows that K4K_4-freeness matters for k>17n2/169k>17n^2/169; context on clique packings above the Turán number, not the partition number the problem asks for. #1009: p. 10 (page image) states Győri's exact ranges, ϕ3(n,k)=k\phi_3(n,k)=k if k≤2n−10k\le2n-10 for odd nn or k≤1.5n−5k\le1.5n-5 for even nn, citing [7] (the 1988 paper) with [9] "for minor correction", the statement behind the site's "f(c)=0f(c)=0 if c<2c<2 for odd nn or c<3/2c<3/2 for even nn"; Theorem 1.6 (p. 2) restates Győri's k−O(k2/n2)k-O(k^2/n^2) bound for every fixed r≥3r\ge3 and k=o(n2)k=o(n^2), citing the 1991 Combinatorica paper; the copy read is the arXiv v2 of this paper, published in Combinatorica 45 (2025).

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.