Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

C(r)C(r) is "the maximal length C(r)C(r) of a sequence of consecutive integers each divisible by one of rr arbitrarily chosen primes" (p. 225). For a sequence A\mathcal A of XX consecutive integers and the product QQ of rr primes q1,…,qrq_1,\ldots,q_r, the sifting function S(A,Q)=∑a∈A,(a,Q)=11S(\mathcal A,Q)=\sum_{a\in\mathcal A,(a,Q)=1}1 counts the elements of A\mathcal A coprime to QQ, and Jacobsthal's problem "is how large XX and rr must be in order to have S(A,Q)>0S(\mathcal A,Q)>0" (p. 225).

Theorem (p. 226, quoted). "There exists an absolute constant c>0c>0 such that for arbitrarily chosen primes q1,…qrq_1,\ldots q_r, r>1r>1 each interval of the length

c(1−1q1)−1⋯(1−1qr)−1r2log⁡rc\Bigl(1-\frac1{q_1}\Bigr)^{-1}\cdots\Bigl(1-\frac1{q_r}\Bigr)^{-1}r^2\log r

contains at least r2r^2 integer numbers coprime to q1⋯qrq_1\cdots q_r."

The paper introduces it with (p. 226): "The aim of this paper is to prove (1) for C(r)C(r). Modifying the arguments used in [3] we shall show that slightly more is true", where (1) is C0(r)≪r2log⁡2rC_0(r)\ll r^2\log^2r for the first rr primes, credited to the author's 1971 paper on the error term in the linear sieve. The Corollary, C(r)≪r2log⁡2rC(r)\ll r^2\log^2r, follows on the same page.

Source. H. Iwaniec, On the problem of Jacobsthal, Demonstratio Math. 11 (1978), no. 1, 225--231; the Theorem on printed p. 226 (PDF p. 2 of the publisher's scan) and its proof on pp. 228--230 (PDF pp. 4--6), read on the page images. The edition read is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the definition of C(r)C(r) and the sieve setting were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof was followed at the level of its displays on the page images of pp. 229--230: the choice of weights, Lemma 2 as quoted, display (7) and the closing parameter choice; Lemma 1 (pp. 227--228) was read for structure only, and Lemma 2 is quoted by the paper from its [3] without proof. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

§ 3, pp. 228--230, by the shifted sieve of § 2. For XX consecutive integers ∣∣Ad∣−X/d∣<1\bigl||\mathcal A_d|-X/d\bigr|<1, so the sieve hypothesis (R) holds with A=B=1A=B=1 and f(d)=df(d)=d. Let z≥2z\ge2, y≥z2y\ge z^2 and PP the product of the primes p≤zp\le z; the lower-bound weights λn=μ(n)\lambda_n=\mu(n) for n=p1⋯pun=p_1\cdots p_u, p1>⋯>pup_1>\cdots>p_u, with p1⋯p2l<yp2l−2p_1\cdots p_{2l}<yp_{2l}^{-2} for 2l≤u2l\le u, and λn=0\lambda_n=0 otherwise, satisfy the lower-bound condition (-) of Lemma 1. Lemma 2, quoted from [3] for 4≤z2≤y<z44\le z^2\le y<z^4: (5) ∑n∣P∣λn∣≪y(log⁡y)−2\sum_{n\mid P}|\lambda_n|\ll y(\log y)^{-2} and (6) ∑n∣Pσn/∏p∣n(p−1)=2eγlog⁡(s−1)/s+O(1/log⁡y)\sum_{n\mid P}\sigma_n/\prod_{p\mid n}(p-1)=2e^\gamma\log(s-1)/s+O(1/\log y) with s=log⁡y/log⁡zs=\log y/\log z. Given primes q1<⋯<qrq_1<\cdots<q_r, r>1r>1, put Q=q1⋯qrQ=q_1\cdots q_r, z=prz=p_r and l(qi)=pil(q_i)=p_i, the ii-th prime, so that g(n)=ng(n)=n on n∣Pn\mid P and f(d)=df(d)=d on d∣Qd\mid Q satisfy the shift condition (2), g(l(d))≤f(d)g(l(d))\le f(d), because pi≤qip_i\le q_i. Lemma 1 (4) with Lemma 2 gives (7)

S(A,Q)≥X∏q∣Q(1−1q){2eγlog⁡(s−1)s+O(1log⁡y)}+O(ylog⁡2y).S(\mathcal A,Q)\ge X\prod_{q\mid Q}\Bigl(1-\frac1q\Bigr) \Bigl\{2e^\gamma\frac{\log(s-1)}s+O\Bigl(\frac1{\log y}\Bigr)\Bigr\} +O\Bigl(\frac y{\log^2y}\Bigr).

With y=Cz2y=Cz^2 and X=∏q∣Q(1−1/q)−1y/log⁡zX=\prod_{q\mid Q}(1-1/q)^{-1}y/\log z for a sufficiently large absolute constant CC, "the right hand side of (7) is >y/log⁡2z>r2>y/\log^2z>r^2", and z=pr≍rlog⁡rz=p_r\asymp r\log r makes XX of the stated order. Not checked here beyond the displays.

Dependencies

Within the paper: Lemma 1 (p. 227), the shifted sieve inequality, proved on p. 228 in its lower-bound form (4). Outside it: Lemma 2 (p. 229), the two estimates (5) and (6) for the linear-sieve weights, quoted from the author's 1971 paper On the error term in the linear sieve, Acta Arith. 19 (1971), 1--30 (the paper's [3], not held), whose proof the paper calls "very complicated"; the idea of the shift is credited to Halberstam and Richert, Mean value theorems for a class of arithmetic functions, Acta Arith. 18 (1971), 243--256 (the paper's [2], not held).

Bears on

  • Problem 970: the source of the Corollary C(r)≪r2log⁡2rC(r)\ll r^2\log^2r, the site's h(k)≪(klog⁡k)2h(k)\ll(k\log k)^2, with the explicit factor ∏i≤r(1−1/qi)−1\prod_{i\le r}(1-1/q_i)^{-1}, which is largest for the first rr primes.
  • Problem 687: at qi=piq_i=p_i and r=π(x)r=\pi(x) the interval length is ≍π(x)2log⁡2π(x)≪x2\asymp\pi(x)^2\log^2\pi(x)\ll x^2, the source of Y(x)≪x2Y(x)\ll x^2 through the Corollary.