Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Iwaniec 1978 problem jacobsthal

../

corollary: Iwaniec's bound C(r) ≪ r^2 log^2 r for the maximal run of consecutive integers each divisible by one of r arbitrary primes, the site's h(k) ≪ (k log k)^2 for Problem 970, with its primorial case Y(x) ≪ x^2 for Problem 687 and the inverse S(k) ≫ k^{1/2} for Problem 929.

theorem: Iwaniec's shifted-sieve theorem that every interval of length a constant times r^2 log r times the product of (1 - 1/q_i)^{-1} contains at least r^2 integers coprime to the r arbitrary primes q_1, ..., q_r.


Henryk Iwaniec, On the problem of Jacobsthal, Demonstratio Mathematica XI (1978), no. 1, 225--231, DOI 10.1515/dema-1978-0121; the issue is dedicated to Professor Stefan Straszewicz (masthead, p. 225); the author at the Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences; received 1 October 1977 (p. 231). Cited as [Iw78] on the problem pages, which print the volume as 11. The printed pages are 225--231; the Crossref record's 225--232 counts one page more than the article prints, and the PDF's eighth page is blank. Its six references (pp. 230--231): Erdős, On the integers relatively prime to nn and on a number-theoretic function considered by Jacobsthal, Math. Scand. 11 (1962), 163--170 as printed (Crossref: volume 10, DOI 10.7146/math.scand.a-10523; the problem pages' [Er62], not held); Halberstam and Richert, Mean value theorems for a class of arithmetic functions, Acta Arith. 18 (1971), 243--256; Iwaniec, On the error term in the linear sieve, Acta Arith. 19 (1971), 1--30 (the paper's [3], the source of its Lemma 2 and of the primorial bound (1)); Jurkat and Richert, An improvement of Selberg's sieve method. I, Acta Arith. 16 (1969), 207--216 as printed (Crossref: Acta Arith. 11 (1965), 217--240, DOI 10.4064/aa-11-2-217-240; the printed location holds Jutila, A statistical density theorem for L-functions with applications); Selberg, Sieve methods, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 20 (1971), 311--351; and Vaughan, On the order of magnitude of Jacobsthal's function, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 20 (1976--77), 329--331. None of the six is held.

The copy read for this card is the publisher's open-access scan of the printed article: 8 pages, printed pp. 225--231 = PDF pp. 1--7 (printed p. nn is PDF p. n−224n-224) and a blank PDF p. 8, a typewritten original scanned to a 2017 file (the scan's metadata names iTextSharp and a creation date of 29 November 2017) with an OCR text layer that locates prose and garbles the displays, subscripts, inequality signs and the script letter A\mathcal A. Provenance: the copy was obtained free on 2026-09-22 from the publisher's open-access PDF endpoint, https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dema-1978-0121/pdf?licenseType=open-access, the DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/dema-1978-0121 resolving to the article's page there; 396,957 bytes. No notice is printed in the scan; the publisher's article page for DOI 10.1515/dema-1978-0121 and the journal's page both answered HTTP 405 on 2026-10-02, so neither could be read, and the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 license that the Crossref record names was seen neither in the scan nor on a readable page; the term is unstated.

Read status: claims checked for the definition of C(r)C(r), the sieve setting, the Jurkat--Richert bound C(r)<c(ε)r2+εC(r)<c(\varepsilon)r^{2+\varepsilon} (p. 225), the definition of C0(r)C_0(r), the two primorial bounds including display (1), Jacobsthal's two questions, the Theorem and the Corollary (p. 226), Lemma 2 with displays (5) and (6) (p. 229), the choice of parameters, display (7), the closing step of the proof and the note added in proof (p. 230), each read clause by clause on the page images of PDF pp. 1--2 and 5--6 on 2026-09-22; the references and the received line (pp. 230--231, PDF pp. 6--7) were read on the page images. The shifted sieve of § 2, Lemma 1 with its hypotheses (R), (2), (+) and (-) and its displays (3) and (4), and the proof of (4) (pp. 227--228, PDF pp. 3--4) were read on the page images for structure only, and the proof of the Theorem (pp. 228--230) was followed at the level of its displays without checking Lemma 1, the sieve weights λn\lambda_n or the quoted Lemma 2. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Contents

  • § 1, Introduction (pp. 225--226, page images). The paper defines Jacobsthal's problem as the estimation, for a given rr, of "the maximal length C(r)C(r) of a sequence of consecutive integers each divisible by one of rr arbitrarily chosen primes" (p. 225), referring to [1] for the history and references. The sieve setting: for a sequence A\mathcal A of XX consecutive integers and Q=q1⋯qrQ=q_1\cdots q_r, the sifting function S(A,Q)=∑a∈A,(a,Q)=11S(\mathcal A,Q)=\sum_{a\in\mathcal A,(a,Q)=1}1 counts the elements of A\mathcal A coprime to QQ, and the question becomes how large XX must be, in terms of rr, to force S(A,Q)>0S(\mathcal A,Q)>0. The author recalls that the sieving limit of the linear sieve, the sieve at work here, is 22 by Jurkat and Richert [4], so that C(r)<c(ε)r2+εC(r)<c(\varepsilon)r^{2+\varepsilon} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 follows easily; "by the sieve method the exponent 2 cannot be reduced", though small improvements remain possible when the sieve's error term is taken into account. Then (p. 226): for r>1r>1, C0(r)C_0(r) is the same maximal length when the rr primes are the first rr primes; the results of [4] give C0(r)≪r2exp⁡(log⁡r)13/14C_0(r)\ll r^2\exp(\log r)^{13/14}, and the author's [3] proves (1) C0(r)≪r2log⁡2rC_0(r)\ll r^2\log^2r. Jacobsthal asked "whether C(r)=C0(r)C(r)=C_0(r) and whether C(r)≪r2C(r)\ll r^2". The paper's aim is (1) for C(r)C(r), and by modifying the arguments of [3] it proves slightly more: the Theorem and the Corollary, quoted on theorem and corollary.
  • § 2, The shifted sieve (pp. 226--228; structure only). The author credits the idea of the shifted sieve to the work of Halberstam and Richert [2]. For a finite sequence A\mathcal A of integers, a square-free QQ and ∣Ad∣=∑a∈A,a≡0 (d)1|\mathcal A_d|=\sum_{a\in\mathcal A,a\equiv0\ (d)}1, condition (R) asks ∣∣Ad∣−X/f(d)∣≤ABτ(d)\bigl||\mathcal A_d|-X/f(d)\bigr|\le AB^{\tau(d)} for all d∣Qd\mid Q, with constants A,B,X≥1A,B,X\ge1 and a multiplicative f(d)≥1f(d)\ge1. A second square-free number PP with the same number of divisors as QQ, a multiplicative g(n)≥1g(n)\ge1 on n∣Pn\mid P, and a one-to-one multiplicative correspondence ll between the divisors of PP and of QQ with (2) g(n)≤f(d)g(n)\le f(d) for n=l(d)n=l(d) are the shift. Lemma 1 (p. 227): if the real numbers {λn}n∣P\{\lambda_n\}_{n\mid P} satisfy (+) σm=∑n∣mλn≤∑n∣mμ(n)\sigma_m=\sum_{n\mid m}\lambda_n\le\sum_{n\mid m}\mu(n) for all m∣Pm\mid P, or (-) the reverse inequality, then (3) an upper bound, or (4) a lower bound, holds for S(A,Q)S(\mathcal A,Q): the main term X∏q∣Q(1−1/f(q))∑n∣Pσn/∏p∣n(g(p)−1)X\prod_{q\mid Q}(1-1/f(q))\sum_{n\mid P}\sigma_n/\prod_{p\mid n}(g(p)-1) plus or minus the remainder A∑n∣P∣λn∣Bτ(n)A\sum_{n\mid P}|\lambda_n|B^{\tau(n)}. Only (4) is proved (p. 228, half a page): the sieve weights are transported from PP to QQ through ll, and (2) gives the comparison of the two Euler-type sums.
  • § 3, The proof of the theorem (pp. 228--230, page images for pp. 229 and 230). For XX consecutive integers, ∣∣Ad∣−X/d∣<1\bigl||\mathcal A_d|-X/d\bigr|<1, so (R) holds with A=B=1A=B=1 and f(d)=df(d)=d. With z≥2z\ge2, y≥z2y\ge z^2 and PP the product of the primes p≤zp\le z, the weights λn=μ(n)\lambda_n=\mu(n) for n=p1⋯pun=p_1\cdots p_u, p1>⋯>pup_1>\cdots>p_u, with p1⋯p2l<yp2l−2p_1\cdots p_{2l}<yp_{2l}^{-2} for 2l≤u2l\le u, and 00 otherwise, satisfy (-); the trivial remainder bound ∑n∣P∣λn∣<y\sum_{n\mid P}|\lambda_n|<y "is too weak to prove (1)". Lemma 2 (p. 229), quoted from [3] for 4≤z2≤y<z44\le z^2\le y<z^4: (5) ∑n∣P∣λn∣≪y(log⁡y)−2\sum_{n\mid P}|\lambda_n|\ll y(\log y)^{-2} and (6) the value 2eγlog⁡(s−1)/s+O(1/log⁡y)2e^\gamma\log(s-1)/s+O(1/\log y) for ∑n∣Pσn/∏p∣n(p−1)\sum_{n\mid P}\sigma_n/\prod_{p\mid n}(p-1), with s=log⁡y/log⁡zs=\log y/\log z and γ\gamma Euler's constant; the paper notes that the proof in [3] is intricate, going through differential equations with shifted arguments, and suggests that (5) and (6) cannot be improved. Then (p. 230), for primes q1<⋯<qrq_1<\cdots<q_r, r>1r>1: Q=q1⋯qrQ=q_1\cdots q_r, z=prz=p_r, l(qi)=pil(q_i)=p_i, so that g(n)=ng(n)=n on n∣Pn\mid P and f(d)=df(d)=d on d∣Qd\mid Q satisfy (2), and Lemmas 1 and 2 give (7), a lower bound for S(A,Q)S(\mathcal A,Q) with main term X∏q∣Q(1−1/q){2eγlog⁡(s−1)/s+O(1/log⁡y)}X\prod_{q\mid Q}(1-1/q)\{2e^\gamma\log(s-1)/s+O(1/\log y)\} and remainder O(y/log⁡2y)O(y/\log^2y); with y=Cz2y=Cz^2 and X=∏q∣Q(1−1/q)−1y/log⁡zX=\prod_{q\mid Q}(1-1/q)^{-1}y/\log z for a sufficiently large absolute CC, the right-hand side of (7) exceeds y/log⁡2z>r2y/\log^2z>r^2, which completes the proof.
  • Note added in proof (p. 230): Vaughan [6] had recently derived the estimate C(r)≪r2log⁡4rC(r)\ll r^2\log^4r from [3].

Compiled scope

The paper is compiled at statement depth for the result the three citing problems consume: the Corollary C(r)≪r2log⁡2rC(r)\ll r^2\log^2r with the Theorem it follows from (p. 226), read on the page image and paged on corollary and theorem. The paper states its results for C(r)C(r) and C0(r)C_0(r); the translations to the site's h(k)h(k), Y(x)Y(x) and S(k)S(k) are authored one-line steps recorded on the corollary page and named as such. Lemma 1 and the proof of the Theorem were read for structure only, Lemma 2 is quoted by the paper from its [3] without proof, and nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on. #970: the Corollary (printed p. 226, PDF p. 2), "We have C(r)≪r2log⁡2rC(r)\ll r^2\log^2r", is the site's "Iwaniec [Iw78] proved h(k)≪(klog⁡k)2h(k)\ll(k\log k)^2": the paper's C(r)C(r), the longest run of consecutive integers each divisible by one of rr arbitrary primes (p. 225), is h(r)−1h(r)-1 for the problem's hh, and is the C(r)C(r) of Erdős's 1965 lecture. The Theorem (p. 226) gives the bound with the explicit factor ∏i≤r(1−1/qi)−1r2log⁡r\prod_{i\le r}(1-1/q_i)^{-1}r^2\log r. Page 226 also records Jacobsthal's two questions, whether C(r)=C0(r)C(r)=C_0(r) and whether C(r)≪r2C(r)\ll r^2, the second being the problem's displayed question, and p. 225 records that the sieve method cannot bring the exponent 2 down. #687: the Corollary at r=π(x)r=\pi(x) gives Y(x)≤C(π(x))≪π(x)2log⁡2π(x)≪x2Y(x)\le C(\pi(x))\ll\pi(x)^2\log^2\pi(x)\ll x^2, the upper bound the site and [FGKMT18] p. 4 attribute to the paper; the primorial function C0(r)C_0(r) of p. 226 is Y(pr)Y(p_r), and the paper credits (1), C0(r)≪r2log⁡2rC_0(r)\ll r^2\log^2r, to the author's 1971 paper [3] and proves it here for arbitrary primes. #929: the same Y(x)≪x2Y(x)\ll x^2 inverts to S(k)≫k1/2S(k)\gg k^{1/2}, Erdős's "B(n)>cnB(n)>c\sqrt n" of 1979, since S(k)S(k) is the least xx with Y(x)≥kY(x)\ge k.

Results.

  • Theorem (p. 226): for an absolute constant c>0c>0 and arbitrary primes q1,…,qrq_1,\ldots,q_r, r>1r>1, each interval of length c∏i≤r(1−1/qi)−1r2log⁡rc\prod_{i\le r}(1-1/q_i)^{-1}r^2\log r contains at least r2r^2 integers coprime to q1⋯qrq_1\cdots q_r.
  • Corollary (p. 226): C(r)≪r2log⁡2rC(r)\ll r^2\log^2r; in the problems' notation h(k)≪(klog⁡k)2h(k)\ll(k\log k)^2, Y(x)≪x2Y(x)\ll x^2 and S(k)≫k1/2S(k)\gg k^{1/2}.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.