Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 970

../

claims/: The 3 claim pages of Problem 970, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Let h(k)h(k) be Jacobsthal's function, defined to as the minimal mm such that, if nn has at most kk prime factors, then in any set of mm consecutive integers there exists an integer coprime to nn. Determine the order of magnitude of h(k)h(k). In particular, is it true that

h(k)≪k2?h(k) \ll k^2?

Formulation. The site's wording (the page shows no last-edited date). Jacobsthal's function of an integer nn is the least mm such that any mm consecutive integers contain one coprime to nn (OEIS A048669; [FGKMT18] p. 4 defines the same j(n)j(n) as "the maximal gap between integers coprime to nn"); it depends only on the distinct prime factors of nn, and "at most kk prime factors" is read as at most kk distinct prime factors, the reading of Erdős's 1965 text (ν(n)\nu(n) "the number of distinct prime factors") and of the formal-conjectures file. So h(k)=max⁡{j(n):ω(n)≤k}h(k)=\max\{j(n):\omega(n)\le k\}. Erdős's 1965 lecture writes max⁡g(n)=C(r)+1\max g(n)=C(r)+1 over ν(n)≤r\nu(n)\le r, so his C(r)C(r) is h(r)−1h(r)-1, a shift that does not affect orders of magnitude. For the product P(x)P(x) of the primes up to xx, which has π(x)\pi(x) prime factors, j(P(x))=Y(x)+1j(P(x))=Y(x)+1 with YY the covering function of Problem 687 ([FGKMT18] display (1.3)); hence h(π(x))≥Y(x)+1h(\pi(x))\ge Y(x)+1, an identity of one line made here and named as such below. The displayed question is Jacobsthal's conjecture as Erdős reports it in 1965 (display (30)). Two questions: the order of magnitude, to which the label OPEN attaches and which stays open, and the displayed h(k)≪k2h(k)\ll k^2, answered yes by the accepted partial claim recorded under Status (the site's OPEN label predates the release that settled it).

Status. Open. The displayed question, h(k)≪k2h(k)\ll k^2, is answered yes by the accepted partial claim of 25 September 2026 (the claim page): the OpenAI release's Lean declaration OAI.Erdos970.Erdos970Final.erdos_970_quadratic, which states h(k)≤Ck2h(k)\le Ck^2 for one absolute CC and which this corpus built, axiom-checked and audited against the formulation above on 2026-10-07, the claim's only acceptance evidence. The manuscript claims the sharper h(k)≪k2/(log⁡log⁡3k)2h(k)\ll k^2/(\log\log 3k)^2, which the release proves in a separate declaration, erdos_970_iterated_log, that this corpus has not axiom-checked or accepted; the manuscript has no refereed version and no outside review known here. The order of magnitude, to which the label attaches, stays open between the lower bounds below and the accepted quadratic bound. The bounds in hand from the search, whose scope the Current assessment records: the refereed upper bound h(k)≪(klog⁡k)2h(k)\ll(k\log k)^2 (the claim page Iwaniec 1978, accepted, partial), the Corollary of [Iw78], p. 226, C(r)≪r2log⁡2rC(r)\ll r^2\log^2r for the longest run of consecutive integers each divisible by one of rr arbitrary primes, where C(k)=h(k)−1C(k)=h(k)-1 is the same function as Erdős's 1965 C(r)C(r) ([FGKMT18] attests the primorial case Y(x)≪x2Y(x)\ll x^2, and Erdős's 1965 lecture had C(r)<c2rc3C(r)<c_2r^{c_3}); and two lower bounds, Erdős's 1965 display (29), C(r)>c1r(log⁡r)2log⁡3r/(log⁡2r)2C(r)>c_1r(\log r)^2\log_3r/(\log_2r)^2, and the bound obtained from [FGKMT18]'s (1.2) through the identity above, h(k)≫k(log⁡k)2log⁡3k/log⁡2kh(k)\gg k(\log k)^2\log_3k/\log_2k, an authored one-line derivation recorded below and on the claim page Ford, Green, Konyagin, Maynard and Tao 2014 (accepted, partial). The site's commentary prints the best lower bound as h(k)≫klog⁡klog⁡3k/(log⁡2k)2h(k)\gg k\log k\log_3k/(\log_2k)^2 and attributes it to [FGKMT18]; that display is weaker than both source-supported bounds, by a factor of log⁡k\log k against (29) and log⁡k⋅log⁡2k\log k\cdot\log_2k against the derived bound, is recorded here as the site's, with the discrepancy noted as a site-versus-source matter; it does not affect the label. Jacobsthal's conjecture h(k)≪k2h(k)\ll k^2 was already "hopeless at present" for Erdős in 1965. This is a bounded negative finding, not a certificate of openness.

Source. erdosproblems.com/970, accessed 2026-09-18: the problem page (OPEN, with the site's note that the problem cannot be settled by a finite computation; no last-edited date; source key [Er65b]; commentary citing [Iw78], [FGKMT18] and Problem 687; indicators showing a formalized statement and OEIS A048669), its empty discussion thread and its empty proof-claim tab. The indicator showed no formalized statement on 2026-09-05; the community database records the statement as formalized since 7 September 2026. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #970, https://www.erdosproblems.com/970, accessed 2026-09-18.

References.

  • [Er65b] Erdős, P., Some recent advances and current problems in number theory. Lectures on Modern Mathematics, Vol. III, Wiley (1965), 196--244; the Jacobsthal passage with displays (29) and (30) on printed p. 208; display (13) on p. 201. Library home: erdos_1965_recent_advances_current_problems_number_theory; result pages display (29) and display (30).
  • [Iw78] Iwaniec, H., On the problem of Jacobsthal. Demonstratio Math. 11 (1978), no. 1, 225--231, DOI 10.1515/dema-1978-0121 (the printed pages; the Crossref record's 225--232 counts the blank page after the article). The definition of C(r)C(r) and the Jurkat--Richert bound on printed p. 225, the Theorem, the Corollary and Jacobsthal's questions on p. 226, and the note added in proof on p. 230. Library home: iwaniec_1978_problem_jacobsthal; result pages Theorem and Corollary.
  • [FGKMT18] Ford, K., Green, B., Konyagin, S., Maynard, J. and Tao, T., Long gaps between primes. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 31 (2018), no. 1, 65--105, DOI 10.1090/jams/876; arXiv:1412.5029v3 (14 July 2016; the journal text not compared). Display (1.2), p. 3; (1.3) and the Iwaniec attestation, p. 4. Library home: ford_2018_long_gaps_between_primes; result pages display (1.2) and Lemma 1.1 with (1.3).
  • [Ja60] Jacobsthal, E., Über Sequenzen ganzer Zahlen, von denen keine zu nn teilerfremd ist, I--III. Norske Vid. Selsk. Forh. (Trondheim) 33 (1960), as OEIS A048669 cites it. Not held; the origin of the function and, per [Er65b], of the conjecture.
  • [Er62] Erdős, P., On the integers relatively prime to nn and on a number theoretic function considered by Jacobsthal. Math. Scand. 10 (1962), 163--170 ([Er65b]'s reference [21]; DOI 10.7146/math.scand.a-10523 per OEIS A048669). Not held; context.
  • [OEIS] Sequence A048669, The Jacobsthal function g(n)g(n): maximal gap in a list of all the integers relatively prime to nn (accessed 2026-09-18); its comments give the "least integer such that among any g(n)g(n) consecutive integers there is at least one relatively prime to nn" form and Kanold's g(n)≤2wg(n)\le2^w for ww distinct prime factors.

Formalization. The statement is in formal-conjectures, and a proof of the displayed question is in the OpenAI release's Lean tree at the revision pinned on the claim page, the declaration OAI.Erdos970.Erdos970Final.erdos_970_quadratic, built, axiom-checked and audited here as the claim page records; no formalization reaches the order-of-magnitude question. The file ErdosProblems/970.lean of formal-conjectures at the linked commit (the head of main on 2026-09-18) defines IsJacobsthalBound (k m : ℕ) : Prop := ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → n.primeFactors.card ≤ k → ∀ a : ℤ, ∃ i : ℕ, i < m ∧ (a + i).natAbs.Coprime n and jacobsthalFunction (k : ℕ) : ℕ := sInf {m : ℕ | IsJacobsthalBound k m}, the site's h(k)h(k) with distinct prime factors, and declares erdos_970 : answer(sorry) ↔ ∃ C > (0 : ℝ), ∀ k : ℕ, 0 < k → (jacobsthalFunction k : ℝ) ≤ C * k ^ 2 under category research open, with proof sorry and no formal_proof attribute; its header cites [FGKMT18] and [Iw78]. The community database (accessed 2026-09-18) lists the problem open as of its last update, of 31 August 2025, the statement formalized since 7 September 2026, formal_status unformalized, no formal-proof URL, the comment "Jacobsthal's function" and OEIS A048669. The formal-conjectures file was not built here.

Current assessment

The question (site formulation of 2026-09-18). The statement above; OPEN, with the site's note that the problem cannot be settled by a finite computation; no last-edited date. The commentary attributes the conjecture h(k)≪k2h(k)\ll k^2 to Jacobsthal, credits Iwaniec [Iw78] with h(k)≪(klog⁡k)2h(k)\ll(k\log k)^2, gives h(k)≫klog⁡klog⁡3k/(log⁡2k)2h(k)\gg k\log k\log_3k/(\log_2k)^2 as the best lower bound known, due to [FGKMT18], and calls hh a more general form of the function of Problem 687. The thread and the proof-claim tab are empty.

The origin. [Er65b] p. 208 (display (29), display (30)): "Jacobsthal defines g(n)g(n) to be the least integer such that among any g(n)g(n) consecutive integers there is at least one relatively prime to nn. Put

max⁡g(n)=C(r)+1,\max g(n)=C(r)+1,

where the maximum is taken over all the integers nn with ν(n)≤r\nu(n)\le r (where ν(n)\nu(n) denotes the number of distinct prime factors of nn). We have

c1r(log⁡r)2log⁡log⁡log⁡r(log⁡log⁡r)2<C(r)<c2rc3.(29)\frac{c_1r(\log r)^2\log\log\log r}{(\log\log r)^2}<C(r)<c_2r^{c_3}. \qquad (29)

The left side of (29) follows from (13) and the right side can be easily obtained by Brun's method." Then: "Jacobsthal conjectured that

C(r)<c4r2.(30)C(r)<c_4r^2. \qquad (30)

The exponent in (29) can be reduced by Selberg's improvement of Brun's method, but (30) seems hopeless at present [21]." Display (13), on p. 201, is Erdős's 1935 prime-gap bound dn>clog⁡nlog⁡log⁡n/(log⁡log⁡log⁡n)2d_n>c\log n\log\log n/(\log\log\log n)^2; the printed left side of (29) has the shape of Rankin's (14) on the same page and is recorded as printed. No proof of either side is given.

Upper bound. h(k)≪(klog⁡k)2h(k)\ll(k\log k)^2 is the Corollary of [Iw78] (p. 226): "We have C(r)≪r2log⁡2rC(r)\ll r^2\log^2r", where C(r)C(r) is "the maximal length C(r)C(r) of a sequence of consecutive integers each divisible by one of rr arbitrarily chosen primes" (p. 225), so that h(k)=C(k)+1h(k)=C(k)+1 (a one-line step made on the result page: a run each sharing a factor with nn is a run each divisible by one of the ω(n)\omega(n) primes of nn, and CC is nondecreasing); it is the C(r)C(r) of Erdős's 1965 display (29). The Corollary follows the paper's Theorem (p. 226): for an absolute c>0c>0 and arbitrary primes q1,…,qrq_1,\ldots,q_r, r>1r>1, each interval of length c∏i≤r(1−1/qi)−1r2log⁡rc\prod_{i\le r}(1-1/q_i)^{-1}r^2\log r contains at least r2r^2 integers coprime to q1⋯qrq_1\cdots q_r, proved by a shifted linear sieve with two estimates quoted from the author's 1971 paper; the proof was followed at the level of its displays and not checked. Page 226 credits the primorial case, C0(r)≪r2log⁡2rC_0(r)\ll r^2\log^2r for the first rr primes, to that 1971 paper, reports that "Jacobsthal asked whether C(r)=C0(r)C(r)=C_0(r) and whether C(r)≪r2C(r)\ll r^2", the displayed question, and the note added in proof (p. 230) records Vaughan's weaker C(r)≪r2log⁡4rC(r)\ll r^2\log^4r; p. 225 remarks that "by the sieve method the exponent 2 cannot be reduced". [FGKMT18] p. 4 attests the primorial case, "The best upper bound known is Y(x)≪x2Y(x)\ll x^2, which comes from Iwaniec's work [26] on Jacobsthal's function", and OEIS A048670 records Iwaniec's j(P(pn))≪n2(log⁡n)2j(P(p_n))\ll n^2(\log n)^2, the same form with k=n=π(x)k=n=\pi(x). Nothing better was found, and Erdős's 1965 upper bound c2rc3c_2r^{c_3} had an unspecified exponent.

Lower bounds. Two are source-supported. (a) Erdős's display (29), C(r)>c1r(log⁡r)2log⁡3r/(log⁡2r)2C(r)>c_1r(\log r)^2\log_3r/(\log_2r)^2, from the Erdős--Rankin prime-gap constructions (1965; the paper gives no proof). (b) From [FGKMT18]: display (1.2), Y(x)≫xlog⁡xlog⁡3x/log⁡2xY(x)\gg x\log x\log_3x/\log_2x, and display (1.3), Y(x)=j(P(x))−1Y(x)=j(P(x))-1, give j(P(x))≫xlog⁡xlog⁡3x/log⁡2xj(P(x))\gg x\log x\log_3x/\log_2x. The identity made here: P(x)P(x) has exactly π(x)\pi(x) distinct prime factors, so h(π(x))≥j(P(x))h(\pi(x))\ge j(P(x)); taking x=pkx=p_k, the kk-th prime, so that π(x)=k\pi(x)=k and x∼klog⁡kx\sim k\log k by the prime number theorem, gives

h(k) ≥ j(P(pk)) ≫ pklog⁡pklog⁡3pklog⁡2pk ≍ k(log⁡k)2log⁡3klog⁡2k.h(k)\ \ge\ j(P(p_k))\ \gg\ p_k\log p_k\frac{\log_3p_k}{\log_2p_k} \ \asymp\ k(\log k)^2\frac{\log_3k}{\log_2k}.

This is an authored one-line derivation, not a statement of the paper; OEIS A048670's comment of 2018 records the same form ("$j(x#)\gg x\log x\log\log \log x/\log\log x$ and hence a(n)≫nlog⁡2nlog⁡log⁡log⁡n/log⁡log⁡na(n)\gg n\log^2n\log\log\log n/\log\log n"). The site's displayed bound, h(k)≫klog⁡klog⁡3k/(log⁡2k)2h(k)\gg k\log k\log_3k/(\log_2k)^2, is Rankin's bound for Y(x)Y(x), as [FGKMT18] p. 4 states it, with xx replaced by kk, or equivalently Erdős's (29) with one logarithm dropped; it is implied by both source-supported bounds and is not what either source gives for h(k)h(k). Read depth: claims checked for (29), (30), (1.2) and (1.3); the proofs behind (1.2) were not read.

Bounds map. k(log⁡k)2log⁡3k/log⁡2k≪h(k)≪k2k(\log k)^2\log_3k/\log_2k\ll h(k)\ll k^2: the lower bound from the sources above through the authored identity, the upper bound from the accepted partial claim of 25 September 2026 (the claim page), which answers Jacobsthal's conjecture h(k)≪k2h(k)\ll k^2 yes and rests on the Lean declaration erdos_970_quadratic, built, axiom-checked and audited here, not on a refereed source; the manuscript's sharper claim h(k)≪k2/(log⁡log⁡3k)2h(k)\ll k^2/(\log\log 3k)^2 is not accepted here; the best refereed upper bound remains Iwaniec's (klog⁡k)2(k\log k)^2. The site's Problem 687 records an AI-generated improvement of the Y(x)Y(x) bound to xlog⁡x/log⁡3xx\log x/\log_3x, accepted by the site as its account; through the same identity it would give h(k)≫k(log⁡k)2/log⁡3kh(k)\gg k(\log k)^2/\log_3k; that is a lead recorded on Problem 687, not a source result. OEIS A048670 lists j(P(pn))j(P(p_n)) for n≤64n\le64, the values h(k)h(k) would have to exceed.

Search scope. None of the routes below found an upper bound below (klog⁡k)2(k\log k)^2, a lower bound beyond those above, or a proof claim.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab; formal-conjectures 970.lean at the pinned commit; the community database.
  • arXiv: the API queries all:Jacobsthal (40 newest records; the only ones on the function are a 2023 polynomial analog and Jacobsthal-number papers) and abs:"large gaps between primes" OR abs:"long gaps between primes" OR abs:"Jacobsthal function" (21 records: a 2023 polynomial analog, a 2020 note on differences between numbers coprime to primorials, 2019 computational results on a conjecture of Jacobsthal, 2017 notes on Dirichlet's theorem and the function, and older computational and expository items, none improving either bound); the API searches titles and abstracts only, so these zeros are weak.
  • Crossref: the bibliographic query identifying [Iw78]'s DOI; one scripted request to its DOI landing page (HTTP 202, empty body, no PDF).
  • Semantic Scholar: the 100 records citing [FGKMT18], scanned by title (none on Jacobsthal's function for general kk).
  • OEIS: the JSON records of A048669 and A048670.
  • The primary sources: [Er65b] pp. 201 and 208; [FGKMT18] pp. 3--4.

Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X. Not held: [Ja60], [Er62], Kanold's 1967 paper. [Iw78] was not in hand at the time of the search.

Remaining gaps. (1) The refereed upper bound rests on the Corollary of [Iw78] and on the identity h(k)=C(k)+1h(k)=C(k)+1 made on its result page; the proof of the Theorem was followed at the level of its displays, and its Lemma 2 is quoted by the paper from the author's 1971 paper, which is not held. The accepted bound h(k)≤Ck2h(k)\le Ck^2 rests on the Lean kernel, Mathlib and the statement audit recorded on the claim page; the manuscript's claimed saving by (log⁡log⁡3k)2(\log\log 3k)^2 rests on its prose proof, read for structure only, and on a release declaration not axiom-checked here; no outside review or refereed version exists. (2) The site's displayed lower bound is weaker than the source-supported bounds by a factor of log⁡k\log k against (29) and log⁡k⋅log⁡2k\log k\cdot\log_2k against the derived bound; recorded as a site-versus-source note, not resolved with the site. (3) Neither side of Erdős's (29) is proved in the lecture, and the [FGKMT18] proof was not read; the lower bound here rests on that paper's refereed statement and a one-line identity. (4) Jacobsthal's original papers and Erdős's 1962 paper are not held.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.