Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation (printed pp. 757--758). For a family R={fi(x)=mix+bi:i∈I}R=\{f_i(x)=m_ix+b_i:i\in I\} of affine maps, ⟨R:A⟩\langle R:A\rangle is the smallest subset of N\mathbb N that contains the generators AA and is closed under every map in RR; the multiset orbit ⟨R:A⟩#\langle R:A\rangle^\# is obtained by applying to each element of AA every labeled composition fi1∘⋯∘firf_{i_1}\circ\cdots\circ f_{i_r} (r≥1r\ge1), compositions with different index words counted separately even when they are the same function, so that an integer reached in several ways is counted with multiplicity. Densities of a multiset count with multiplicity (p. 758); a set has 0≤d‾(S)≤dˉ(S)≤10\le\underline d(S)\le\bar d(S)\le1 (p. 759).

Theorem 3 (printed p. 759; the paper attributes the result to Erdős and the multiset form to itself). Let R={fi(x)=mix+bi:i∈I}R=\{f_i(x)=m_ix+b_i:i\in I\} be a finite or countably infinite set of affine maps with real coefficients, every mi≥1m_i\ge1 and every bi≥0b_i\ge0. Suppose there is a real σ>0\sigma>0 with

α:=∑i∈I1miσ<1.\alpha:=\sum_{i\in I}\frac1{m_i^{\sigma}}<1.

Let A⊂R>0A\subset\mathbb R_{>0} be a finite or infinite set of generators with no finite limit point. Then for every T≥1T\ge1,

∣⟨R:A⟩#∩[0,T]∣≤11−α(∑a∈A, 0≤a≤T1aσ)Tσ,\bigl|\langle R:A\rangle^\#\cap[0,T]\bigr|\le\frac1{1-\alpha}\Bigl(\sum_{a\in A,\ 0\le a\le T}\frac1{a^{\sigma}}\Bigr)T^{\sigma},

the left side counted with multiplicity.

Corollary 1 (printed p. 761, attributed to Erdős). Let R={2x+1,3x+1}R=\{2x+1,3x+1\} and let τ\tau be the unique real solution of 2−τ+3−τ=12^{-\tau}+3^{-\tau}=1, τ≈0.78788\tau\approx0.78788. For σ=τ+ϵ\sigma=\tau+\epsilon with ϵ>0\epsilon>0 put ασ=2−σ+3−σ<1\alpha_\sigma=2^{-\sigma}+3^{-\sigma}<1. Then the Klarner--Rado multiset S#=⟨R:{1}⟩#S^\#=\langle R:\{1\}\rangle^\# satisfies ∣S#∩[0,T]∣≤Tσ/(1−ασ)|S^\#\cap[0,T]|\le T^{\sigma}/(1-\alpha_\sigma) for all T≥1T\ge1; that is, for each ϵ>0\epsilon>0 there is C(ϵ)C(\epsilon) with ∣S#∩[0,T]∣≤C(ϵ)Tτ+ϵ|S^\#\cap[0,T]|\le C(\epsilon)T^{\tau+\epsilon}. Hence the Klarner--Rado set S=⟨2x+1,3x+1:1⟩S=\langle2x+1,3x+1:1\rangle has natural density zero.

Attribution. Klarner and Rado's 1974 paper prints the density-zero result as its Theorem 8 with credit to Erdős, who "kindly communicated to us the essentials of a result" (their words, quoted on p. 759), and gives ⟨2x+1,3x+1:1⟩\langle2x+1,3x+1:1\rangle as its example. The paper's Theorem 3 is Lagarias's statement of that result for multisets and for possibly infinite families of maps, the generality § 7 needs. The paper's Remark (1) on p. 762 reports Fredman's 1972 thesis sharpening the bound for the Klarner--Rado multiset to C1TτC_1T^{\tau} and Fredman and Knuth's asymptotic cTτ+o(Tτ)cT^{\tau}+o(T^{\tau}), neither held.

Source. J. C. Lagarias, Erdős, Klarner, and the 3x+13x+1 Problem, Amer. Math. Monthly 123 (2016), no. 8, 753--776; Theorem 3 on printed p. 759 (PDF p. 8), its proof on pp. 760--761 (PDF pp. 9--10), Corollary 1 on p. 761 (PDF p. 10), the definitions on pp. 757--758 (PDF pp. 6--7) of the JSTOR copy of the publisher's PDF; statements read on the page images, the proof in the text layer. The edition read is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: Theorem 3, Corollary 1 and the Klarner--Rado quotation were read clause by clause on the page images of PDF pp. 8 and 10 on 2026-09-22; the definitions of pp. 757--758 were read in the text layer. The proof (pp. 760--761) was read in full in the text layer and its two claims followed as sketched below; no step was checked against an independent source, and nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pages 760--761. Write δ=inf⁡mi\delta=\inf m_i; the summability condition forces δ>1\delta>1. Every labeled composition has the form fI(x)=mi1⋯mirx+nIf_I(x)=m_{i_1}\cdots m_{i_r}x+n_I with nI≥0n_I\ge0; let N(T)N(T) be the set of index words (the empty word included, with multiplier 11) whose multiplier product is at most TT. Claim 1: ∣N(T)∣≤Tσ/(1−α)|N(T)|\le T^{\sigma}/(1-\alpha) for T≥1T\ge1. It is proved by induction over the ranges δn<T≤δn+1\delta^n<T\le\delta^{n+1}: a nonempty word with product at most TT has first letter ii and a tail with product at most T/mi≤δnT/m_i\le\delta^n, so ∣N(T)∣≤1+∑i∣N(T/mi)∣≤1+α1−αTσ≤11−αTσ|N(T)|\le1+\sum_i|N(T/m_i)|\le1+\frac{\alpha}{1-\alpha}T^{\sigma}\le\frac1{1-\alpha}T^{\sigma}. Claim 2: since fI(a)≥mi1⋯miraf_I(a)\ge m_{i_1}\cdots m_{i_r}a, the elements of ⟨R:{a}⟩#\langle R:\{a\}\rangle^\# in [0,T][0,T] number at most $|N(T/a)|\le \frac1{1-\alpha}(T/a)^{\sigma}$. Summing Claim 2 over the generators a≤Ta\le T (generators above TT contribute nothing) gives the theorem. Corollary 1 is the case I={2,3}I=\{2,3\}, A={1}A=\{1\}, where ασ=2−σ+3−σ<1\alpha_\sigma=2^{-\sigma}+3^{-\sigma}<1 exactly when σ>τ\sigma>\tau.

Dependencies

None beyond the definitions of pp. 757--758. The result is used again in the proof of Theorem 6, applied to an infinitely generated semigroup.

Bears on

  • Problem 1134: Corollary 1 is the density-zero theorem for the two-generator set ⟨2x+1,3x+1:1⟩\langle2x+1,3x+1:1\rangle that preceded Erdős's problem; the paper explains (p. 766) that Theorem 3 gives no nontrivial bound for the problem's three generators because 1/2+1/3+1/6=11/2+1/3+1/6=1, the reason it gives for the problem's interest, and that the negative answer instead comes through the semigroup relation f2f2f3=f6f2f_2f_2f_3=f_6f_2 and Theorem 3 applied to an infinitely generated free semigroup (Theorem 6).
  • Problem 1135: the theorem the site's remark means; the paper's closing paragraph (p. 775) regards this orbit-size bound as Erdős's nearest approach to problems of the 3x+13x+1 kind.