Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
The problem (printed p. 766, headed "Erdős Positive Density Problem"). Let and , and let be the smallest set of positive integers that contains and is closed under the three maps. The paper asks: "Does the set have a positive density? More precisely, does have a positive lower asymptotic density ?" The paper records that Erdős posed it after proving Theorem 3, which gives no nontrivial bound here since ; that he offered a prize for its solution in 1972; that Crampin and Hilton answered it in the negative soon afterwards, the fact of the solution being recorded in Klarner 1982 (p. 140) and in Hilton's private communications to the author of 2010 and 2014, and shared the prize (Figure 2 reproduces the check to Hilton); and, in footnote 3, Hilton's recollection that the problem "may have been formulated by Klarner" and that Erdős took to it and put up the prize. The solution was never published, and the theorem below is the paper's reconstruction (p. 753: "We supply a reconstructed solution here").
Theorem 6 (printed p. 767, headed "(Crampin and Hilton)"). With and as above and : every has a constant with, at every ,
with the only positive solution of
. In particular has natural density zero, and the answer to the problem is no.
Remark (printed p. 767, stated without proof). The orbit counted with multiplicity behaves differently: for the multiset one has, for every , . The paper says "one can show" this and prints no argument.
Source. J. C. Lagarias, Erdős, Klarner, and the Problem, Amer. Math. Monthly 123 (2016), no. 8, 753--776; the problem, the prize account and footnote 3 on printed p. 766 (PDF p. 15), Theorem 6, the Remark and the first page of the proof on p. 767 (PDF p. 16), the end of the proof on p. 768 (PDF p. 17) of the JSTOR copy of the publisher's PDF; pp. 766--767 read on the page images, p. 768 in the text layer. The edition read is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: the problem statement, the surrounding paragraph, footnote 3, Theorem 6 and the Remark were read clause by clause on the page images of PDF pp. 15--16 on 2026-09-22. The proof (pp. 767--768) was read in full in the text layer and its two claims followed as sketched below; the numerical value of was not recomputed, and nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Pages 767--768. Write the maps as the symbols , , . The semigroup is not free: (display (10)), so the word equals the word . Every word is rewritten by replacing each occurrence of with ; the rewritten words avoid the pattern , represent the same functions, and list every function of the semigroup (possibly with repetition if further relations exist). Let be the free semigroup on the infinitely many generators and for , the words , , , , , and so on. Claim 1: a word avoiding is a word in these generators, or becomes one after a is prefixed, by factoring from the right (a rightmost or is a generator; a rightmost block of 's together with the non- symbol to its left is a generator; only a leading block of 's needs the prefix). Claim 2: the number of integers of below is at most the number of -free words whose dilation factor (the product of their symbols, the multiplier of the function) is below , since exceeds the dilation factor of , and hence at most the number of words in the generators of with dilation factor below . The generators have , so the exponent with lies in , and Theorem 3, applied to the infinitely generated with , bounds the number of such words by with ; the paper states the bound as for (p. 768).
Dependencies
Within the paper: Theorem 3, applied to an infinite generating set. Outside it: the fact that Crampin and Hilton solved the problem rests on Klarner, A sufficient condition for certain semigroups to be free, J. Algebra 74 (1982), p. 140 (the paper's [31], the problem page's [Kl82], not held) and on Hilton's communications (the paper's [25]); their own argument is unpublished, and the printed proof is the author's.
Bears on
- Problem 1134: the problem's statement, as the paper prints it, and the theorem behind its negative answer: the set has density zero, so it has no positive lower density. The paper places the problem in 1972 with a prize, names Crampin and Hilton as the solvers, and distinguishes it from Guy's E36 problem on , , , which is Klarner's free variant of Theorem 11 (p. 771) and which the paper reports unanswered (p. 772).