Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

"The Ramsey function R(k,x)R(k,x) is defined as the minimal integer nn so that any graph on nn vertices contains either a clique of size kk or an independent set of size xx" (p. 354); ln⁡\ln is the natural logarithm.

Theorem 3. "R(3,x)<100x2/ln⁡xR(3,x)<100x^2/\ln x."

As printed on p. 358, with its proof in full: "Let GG be a trianglefree graph with nn vertices and α(G)<x\alpha(G)<x. The neighbors of any point PP form an independent set so deg⁡(P)<x\deg(P)<x. Hence t(G)<xt(G)<x. Theorem 2 gives

x>α(G)>0.01(n/x)ln⁡x(17)x>\alpha(G)>0.01(n/x)\ln x \tag{17}

and therefore

n<100x2/ln⁡x.(18)n<100x^2/\ln x. \tag{18}

"

The theorem is the paper's display (1), R(3,x)≤cx2/ln⁡xR(3,x)\le cx^2/\ln x, with the constant 100100; the introduction (p. 354) sets it against the earlier bounds cx2/(ln⁡x)2<R(3,x)<cx2ln⁡ln⁡x/ln⁡xcx^2/(\ln x)^2<R(3,x)<cx^2\ln\ln x/\ln x of Erdős (1961, lower) and Graver and Yackel (1968, upper), so the theorem removes the ln⁡ln⁡x\ln\ln x factor. The step from t(G)<xt(G)<x to a bound with xx in place of t(G)t(G) uses the monotone form of Theorem 2 (the restatement on p. 357, for 1≤t(G)≤t1\le t(G)\le t); the statement is for xx with ln⁡x>0\ln x>0, and the inequality (17) is printed strict where Theorem 2 prints ≥\ge.

In the notation of Problems 151 and 610. Let H(n)H(n) be the least independence number of a triangle-free graph on nn vertices. The paper states no bound on H(n)H(n); the following rewriting is an elementary step made here. By (18), a triangle-free graph on nn vertices with α(G)<x\alpha(G)<x has n<100x2/ln⁡xn<100x^2/\ln x, so α(G)≥x\alpha(G)\ge x whenever n≥100x2/ln⁡xn\ge100x^2/\ln x and x≥2x\ge2. Take x=⌊cnln⁡n⌋x=\lfloor c\sqrt{n\ln n}\rfloor with c=1/15c=1/15: for large nn, ln⁡x≥12ln⁡n\ln x\ge\frac12\ln n (since ln⁡x=ln⁡c+12ln⁡n+12ln⁡ln⁡n+o(1)\ln x=\ln c+\frac12\ln n+\frac12\ln\ln n+o(1) and 12ln⁡ln⁡n\frac12\ln\ln n eventually exceeds ∣ln⁡c∣|\ln c|), so 100x2/ln⁡x≤100c2nln⁡n/(12ln⁡n)=200c2n<n100x^2/\ln x\le100c^2n\ln n/(\frac12\ln n)=200c^2n<n. Hence

H(n)≥⌊115nln⁡n⌋for all large n,H(n)\ge\Bigl\lfloor\tfrac1{15}\sqrt{n\ln n}\Bigr\rfloor\quad\text{for all large }n,

the bound H(n)≥c1nlog⁡nH(n)\ge c_1\sqrt{n\log n} that Erdős, Gallai and Tuza 1992 state on p. 280 (for their r(n)r(n), which is H(n)H(n)), and the "H(n)≫nlog⁡nH(n)\gg\sqrt{n\log n}" of the site's Problem 610 page; any c<1/200c<1/\sqrt{200} works the same way. The upper bound H(n)≤c2nlog⁡nH(n)\le c_2\sqrt n\log n, a factor of order log⁡n\sqrt{\log n} above the lower bound, is Erdős 1961, and Kim's 1995 Theorem 1.1 gives the matching H(n)≤9nlog⁡nH(n)\le9\sqrt{n\log n}, so H(n)=Θ(nlog⁡n)H(n)=\Theta(\sqrt{n\log n}) with the constants open.

Source. M. Ajtai, J. Komlós and E. Szemerédi, A note on Ramsey numbers, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 29 (1980), no. 3, 354--360; Theorem 3 and its proof on printed p. 358 (PDF p. 5 of the publisher scan), the introduction's displays on p. 354 (PDF p. 1), read on the page images (the text layer garbles the exponents). The edition read is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the introduction's displays were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof (four sentences) was read in full on the page image and followed, given Theorem 2; Theorem 2's own proof was read for structure only on its result page. The rewriting as a bound on H(n)H(n) is an authored specialization made here. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Page 358, from Theorem 2: in a triangle-free graph the neighborhood of every vertex is independent, so α(G)<x\alpha(G)<x forces every degree, hence the average degree t(G)t(G), below xx; Theorem 2 in its monotone form then gives x>α(G)≥0.01(n/x)ln⁡xx>\alpha(G)\ge0.01(n/x)\ln x, that is n<100x2/ln⁡xn<100x^2/\ln x. So every graph on at least 100x2/ln⁡x100x^2/\ln x vertices has a triangle or an independent set of size xx.

Dependencies

Within the paper: Theorem 2 (p. 355) in the restated form of p. 357. The proof of Theorem 2 rests on Turán's theorem and the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality only.

Bears on

  • Problem 165: the upper bound R(3,k)=O(k2/log⁡k)R(3,k)=O(k^2/\log k), with constant 100100, that Shearer's Theorem 1 sharpens to (1+o(1))k2/log⁡k(1+o(1))k^2/\log k; the introduction's account of the earlier bounds is the origin of the "removed the log⁡log⁡\log\log factor" sentence on the page.
  • Problem 553: the upper bound r(K3,Km)=O(m2/log⁡m)r(K_3,K_m)=O(m^2/\log m) that the resolving paper cites, with Kim's lower bound, for the k=1k=1 case r(K3,Km)=Θ(m2/log⁡m)r(K_3,K_m)=\Theta(m^2/\log m) of its Theorem 3.2.
  • Problem 925: the same k=1k=1 input of the resolving paper's induction.
  • Problem 1182: the bound r(K3,Ks)<cs2/log⁡sr(K_3,K_s)<cs^2/\log s on which the lower bound f(n)>An3/2(log⁡n)1/2f(n)>An^{3/2}(\log n)^{1/2} (the site's f(n)f(n), their g(n)g(n)) of Burr, Erdős, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp 1980 (their Theorem 2) rests; they cite the bound from the authors' Sidon-sequence paper (their [1]), which proves it by a quite different method.
  • Problem 151: through the rewriting above, the lower half c1nlog⁡n≤H(n)c_1\sqrt{n\log n}\le H(n) of the bounds on the problem's H(n)H(n) that the 1992 paper quotes from this paper.
  • Problem 610: the same H(n)≫nlog⁡nH(n)\gg\sqrt{n\log n}, the site's reason that a positive answer to Problem 151 would answer that problem.