Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
is a finite graph; is its number of vertices, its number of edges, its average degree and its independence number; is the natural logarithm (p. 354).
Theorem 2. "Let be a graph with , . Assume is trianglefree. Then
"
As printed on p. 355. The Note after it says the paper does not try to optimize its constants. The paper adds that Turán's theorem, (8) , "implies (7) when ", so the content of the theorem is the range ; no other threshold on appears in the statement (for the right side is negative and the bound is empty). The restatement on p. 357, quoted: "Theorem 2 (restatement). Let be a trianglefree graph with and . Then ", which the paper draws from "The monotone behavior of ", (increasing in , decreasing in for ). As printed the restatement is false: its hypothesis runs against that monotonicity, and a single edge (, , ) fails it at and , where the bound is about . The monotone form needs ; Theorem 3 applies it only at , so nothing downstream is affected (an observation made here; Remark 3 prints the same in its definition of ). The later literature states the bound with strict inequalities: "" as Theorem 1 of Ajtai, Erdős, Komlós and Szemerédi 1981 (p. 314), credited to this note and the authors' Sidon-sequence paper, and " for " in Shearer 1983 (p. 83), credited to the Sidon-sequence paper (his [1]) rather than to this note (his [2]).
Sharpness. Remark 2 (p. 357, quoted): "When Theorem 2 is 'best possible.' A random graph with vertices and edges has and triangles. Deleting all points lying on triangles gives a graph with , and ." No further argument is printed. Shearer's Theorem 1 (1983) raises the constant to with the natural logarithm, and his Remark 2 puts the least independence ratio of triangle-free graphs of average degree below .
Source. M. Ajtai, J. Komlós and E. Szemerédi, A note on Ramsey numbers, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 29 (1980), no. 3, 354--360; Theorem 2 and the opening of its proof on printed p. 355 (PDF p. 2 of the publisher scan), the flow chart of Fig. 1 on p. 356 (PDF p. 3), the end of the proof, Remark 1, the restatement and Remark 2 on p. 357 (PDF p. 4), read on the page images (the text layer garbles the displays). The edition read is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the Note, the Turán remark, the restatement and Remark 2 were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof (pp. 355--357) was read on the page images for structure only: its two cases were followed as printed, and the two calculations the paper omits, from (11) to and inequality (15), were not reconstructed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Pages 355--357, by induction on with (9) and the claim (10) . A vertex is a groupie if , where is the sum of the degrees of its neighbors; Lemma 1 (p. 355), every graph has a groupie, follows from by Cauchy--Schwarz. For apply Turán's bound (8). Otherwise let be a groupie of degree . Case 1, : has and (11); "A simple (omitted) calculation gives ", so (12). Case 2, : delete and all its neighbors; since is triangle-free "(the essential point) precisely edges have been omitted", so (13), and (14); "Now a calculation (see Remark 1 below) yields (15) ", and as is adjacent to no vertex of , (16). Remark 1 explains (15) heuristically: deleting the neighbors of a groupie lowers the edge density, so if each round removes a groupie of average degree at constant density the vertex count decays exponentially and about independent points are collected before becomes small; "The constant 0.01 allows groupies of moderate degree to be selected." Fig. 1 (p. 356) is the flow chart of this loop.
Dependencies
Turán's theorem in the form and the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality; nothing else outside the paper. The paper's [1], the authors' Sidon sequence paper (European J. Combin. 2 (1981), 1--11, not held), is said to give "A quite different proof of (1)", the Ramsey bound, and is not an input.
Bears on
- Problem 802: the case of the problem's statement, for triangle-free graphs, with the explicit constant ; Remark 2 makes it sharp up to the constant for , and Remark 3 (pp. 357--358) records Erdős's question for and the authors' inability to decide whether the least independence number of such graphs grows faster than , the problem's question at in a weaker form. The 1981 paper restates the theorem as its Theorem 1 and Shearer's Theorem 1 sharpens its constant.
- Problem 801: the bound Alon's 1996 proof of the problem's statement applies to a triangle-free graph on vertices with independence number below , forcing its average degree to be at least .
- Problem 165: the independence bound behind Theorem 3, , whose constant Shearer's Theorem 1 improves to ; the problem's remaining question is that constant.