Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

GG is a finite graph; n=n(G)n=n(G) is its number of vertices, e=e(G)e=e(G) its number of edges, t=t(G)=2e/nt=t(G)=2e/n its average degree and α(G)\alpha(G) its independence number; ln⁡\ln is the natural logarithm (p. 354).

Theorem 2. "Let GG be a graph with n=n(G)n=n(G), t=t(G)t=t(G). Assume GG is trianglefree. Then

α(G)≥0.01(n/t)ln⁡t.(7)\alpha(G)\ge0.01(n/t)\ln t. \tag{7}

"

As printed on p. 355. The Note after it says the paper does not try to optimize its constants. The paper adds that Turán's theorem, (8) α(G)≥n/(t+1)\alpha(G)\ge n/(t+1), "implies (7) when t<e99t<e^{99}", so the content of the theorem is the range t≥e99t\ge e^{99}; no other threshold on tt appears in the statement (for t<1t<1 the right side is negative and the bound is empty). The restatement on p. 357, quoted: "Theorem 2 (restatement). Let GG be a trianglefree graph with n(G)≤nn(G)\le n and 1≤t(G)≤t1\le t(G)\le t. Then α(G)≥0.01(n/t)ln⁡t\alpha(G)\ge0.01(n/t)\ln t", which the paper draws from "The monotone behavior of g(n,t)g(n,t)", g(n,t)=0.01(n/t)ln⁡tg(n,t)=0.01(n/t)\ln t (increasing in nn, decreasing in tt for t≥et\ge e). As printed the restatement is false: its hypothesis n(G)≤nn(G)\le n runs against that monotonicity, and a single edge (n(G)=2n(G)=2, t(G)=1t(G)=1, α=1\alpha=1) fails it at t=et=e and n=1000n=1000, where the bound is about 3.73.7. The monotone form needs n(G)≥nn(G)\ge n; Theorem 3 applies it only at n=n(G)n=n(G), so nothing downstream is affected (an observation made here; Remark 3 prints the same n(G)≤nn(G)\le n in its definition of f4f_4). The later literature states the bound with strict inequalities: "α>0.01(n/t)log⁡t\alpha>0.01(n/t)\log t" as Theorem 1 of Ajtai, Erdős, Komlós and Szemerédi 1981 (p. 314), credited to this note and the authors' Sidon-sequence paper, and "α>nln⁡d/(100d)\alpha>n\ln d/(100d) for d≥d0d\ge d_0" in Shearer 1983 (p. 83), credited to the Sidon-sequence paper (his [1]) rather than to this note (his [2]).

Sharpness. Remark 2 (p. 357, quoted): "When t<n1/3+o(1)t<n^{1/3+o(1)} Theorem 2 is 'best possible.' A random graph GG with nn vertices and nt/2nt/2 edges has α(G)≲(n/t)ln⁡t\alpha(G)\lesssim(n/t)\ln t and t3/6t^3/6 triangles. Deleting all points lying on triangles gives a graph G′G' with n′=n(G′)∼nn'=n(G')\sim n, t′=t(G′)∼tt'=t(G')\sim t and α(G′)≤α(G)≲c(n′/t′)ln⁡t′\alpha(G')\le\alpha(G)\lesssim c(n'/t')\ln t'." No further argument is printed. Shearer's Theorem 1 (1983) raises the constant 0.010.01 to (1−o(1))(1-o(1)) with the natural logarithm, and his Remark 2 puts the least independence ratio of triangle-free graphs of average degree dd below 2ln⁡d/d2\ln d/d.

Source. M. Ajtai, J. Komlós and E. Szemerédi, A note on Ramsey numbers, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 29 (1980), no. 3, 354--360; Theorem 2 and the opening of its proof on printed p. 355 (PDF p. 2 of the publisher scan), the flow chart of Fig. 1 on p. 356 (PDF p. 3), the end of the proof, Remark 1, the restatement and Remark 2 on p. 357 (PDF p. 4), read on the page images (the text layer garbles the displays). The edition read is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the Note, the Turán remark, the restatement and Remark 2 were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof (pp. 355--357) was read on the page images for structure only: its two cases were followed as printed, and the two calculations the paper omits, from (11) to g(n′,t′)≥g(n,t)g(n',t')\ge g(n,t) and inequality (15), were not reconstructed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pages 355--357, by induction on n(G)n(G) with g(n,t)=0.01(n/t)ln⁡tg(n,t)=0.01(n/t)\ln t (9) and the claim (10) α(G)≥g(G)\alpha(G)\ge g(G). A vertex PP is a groupie if r(P)≥tdeg⁡(P)r(P)\ge t\deg(P), where r(P)r(P) is the sum of the degrees of its neighbors; Lemma 1 (p. 355), every graph has a groupie, follows from ∑Pr(P)=∑Qdeg⁡(Q)2≥(∑Qdeg⁡(Q))2/n=t2n\sum_Pr(P)=\sum_Q\deg(Q)^2\ge(\sum_Q\deg(Q))^2/n=t^2n by Cauchy--Schwarz. For t<e99t<e^{99} apply Turán's bound (8). Otherwise let PP be a groupie of degree dd. Case 1, d≥10td\ge10t: G′=G−{P}G'=G-\{P\} has n′=n−1n'=n-1 and t′≤2(e−10t)/(n−1)=t(n−20)/(n−1)t'\le2(e-10t)/(n-1)=t(n-20)/(n-1) (11); "A simple (omitted) calculation gives g(n′,t′)≥g(n,t)g(n',t')\ge g(n,t)", so α(G)≥α(G′)≥g(G′)≥g(G)\alpha(G)\ge\alpha(G')\ge g(G')\ge g(G) (12). Case 2, d<10td<10t: delete PP and all its neighbors; since GG is triangle-free "(the essential point) precisely r(P)r(P) edges have been omitted", so n′=n−1−dn'=n-1-d (13), e′≤e−tde'\le e-td and t′≤t(n−2d)/(n−1−d)t'\le t(n-2d)/(n-1-d) (14); "Now a calculation (see Remark 1 below) yields (15) g(n′,t′)>g(n,t)−1g(n',t')>g(n,t)-1", and as PP is adjacent to no vertex of G′G', α(G)≥α(G′)+1≥g(G′)+1≥g(G)\alpha(G)\ge\alpha(G')+1\ge g(G')+1\ge g(G) (16). Remark 1 explains (15) heuristically: deleting the neighbors of a groupie lowers the edge density, so if each round removes a groupie of average degree at constant density the vertex count decays exponentially and about (n/t)ln⁡t(n/t)\ln t independent points are collected before tt becomes small; "The constant 0.01 allows groupies of moderate degree to be selected." Fig. 1 (p. 356) is the flow chart of this loop.

Dependencies

Turán's theorem in the form α(G)≥n/(t+1)\alpha(G)\ge n/(t+1) and the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality; nothing else outside the paper. The paper's [1], the authors' Sidon sequence paper (European J. Combin. 2 (1981), 1--11, not held), is said to give "A quite different proof of (1)", the Ramsey bound, and is not an input.

Bears on

  • Problem 802: the case r=3r=3 of the problem's statement, α(G)≫(n/t)log⁡t\alpha(G)\gg(n/t)\log t for triangle-free graphs, with the explicit constant 0.010.01; Remark 2 makes it sharp up to the constant for t<n1/3+o(1)t<n^{1/3+o(1)}, and Remark 3 (pp. 357--358) records Erdős's question for ω(G)<4\omega(G)<4 and the authors' inability to decide whether the least independence number of such graphs grows faster than n/tn/t, the problem's question at r=4r=4 in a weaker form. The 1981 paper restates the theorem as its Theorem 1 and Shearer's Theorem 1 sharpens its constant.
  • Problem 801: the bound Alon's 1996 proof of the problem's statement applies to a triangle-free graph on n0.6/4n^{0.6}/4 vertices with independence number below n\sqrt n, forcing its average degree to be at least c′n0.1log⁡nc'n^{0.1}\log n.
  • Problem 165: the independence bound behind Theorem 3, R(3,x)<100x2/ln⁡xR(3,x)<100x^2/\ln x, whose constant Shearer's Theorem 1 improves to 1+o(1)1+o(1); the problem's remaining question is that constant.