Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Irredundant families of subcubes
corollary_10: Extends Theorem 8 to every n at most 2k: an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the n-cube, each containing the all-zeros or the all-ones vertex, has at most binom(n,k) members.
corollary_5: Deduces from Meshulam's bound that, for n sufficiently large and k at least gamma_0 n with gamma_0 about 0.8900, an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the n-cube has at most binom(n,k) members.
theorem_12: Constructs, for every k at most n, an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the n-cube of size at least beta(1-beta)^((1-beta)/beta) 2^n, within a factor e of Meshulam's upper bound.
theorem_3: States the set-pairs inequality that Ellis attributes to Bollobás and uses to bound irredundant families of subcubes: the reciprocal binomial weights of pairs that meet exactly off the diagonal sum to at most one.
theorem_4: Gives Ellis's new proof of Meshulam's bound: an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the n-cube has at most 2^n binom(n,k) divided by the volume of a Hamming ball of radius k members.
theorem_7: Shows that an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the n-cube whose members each have a private vertex in a fixed Hamming ball of radius k has at most binom(n,k) members.
theorem_8: Shows that an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the 2k-cube, each containing the all-zeros or the all-ones vertex, has at most binom(2k,k) members.
Source
David Ellis, “Irredundant families of subcubes,” Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 150(2) (2011), 257–272. Cambridge record, DOI, and arXiv:1003.2960. The copy read for this card is arXiv:1003.2960v1 (15 March 2010; January 2010 manuscript). The 2011 MPCPS citation is later publication metadata; no published-PDF byte identity is claimed. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1003.2960), every other right reserved.
A -subcube of fixes coordinates and leaves moving. A family is irredundant when each member has a private vertex, meaning a vertex contained in that member and no other member. Write for the maximum size of such a family.
Bounds and constructions
Aharoni and Holzman's upper bound (Proposition 2, p. 4) is
Meshulam's stronger bound is
The paper's new proof of it uses a private vertex for each subcube and a Bollobás set-pairs inequality. Conjecture 1 (Aharoni–Holzman, p. 2) states that for every irredundant family of -subcubes of has size at most ; the principal family of all -subcubes through one fixed vertex attains that value.
Theorem 3 (p. 6) is the set-pairs input: if and are subsets of with exactly when , then
Theorem 4 (p. 6) gives the Meshulam bound above. Corollary 5 (p. 8) states that for sufficiently large and , where solves in and equals to four decimal places, every irredundant family of -subcubes has size at most ; this is Conjecture 1 in that range, deduced from Meshulam's bound being below there. Theorem 7 (p. 9) bounds by an irredundant family whose members each have a private vertex in one fixed Hamming ball of radius .
Theorem 8 (p. 12) proves the principal-family bound in the antipodal case : if every member contains either or , then an irredundant family has size at most . Corollary 10 (p. 14) extends this by induction to all , with bound .
Finally, with
Theorem 12 (p. 20) supplies, for any , an irredundant family of size at least
Thus the Meshulam upper bound and this lower construction differ by a factor at most (pp. 21–22).
Results. Labels and pages are those of arXiv:1003.2960v1.
- Theorem 3 (p. 6): Bollobás's inequality for cross-intersecting set pairs.
- Theorem 4 (p. 6): Meshulam's upper bound, with the paper's new proof.
- Corollary 5 (p. 8): the bound for and large.
- Theorem 7 (p. 9): private vertices in one Hamming ball of radius .
- Theorem 8 (p. 12): -subcubes of through or .
- Corollary 10 (p. 14): the same bound for all .
- Theorem 12 (p. 20): the probabilistic lower bound.
Relation to the library
This is a set-system source for private representatives and a sharp Bollobás-based counting method; the subcube problem itself is separate. The statements recorded here were read against pp. 1–23 of arXiv:1003.2960v1; the result pages record each one's read depth, and none claims a checked proof.
Bears on. #7: background only. No result of this paper concerns congruences.
No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.