Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Irredundant families of subcubes

../

corollary_10: Extends Theorem 8 to every n at most 2k: an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the n-cube, each containing the all-zeros or the all-ones vertex, has at most binom(n,k) members.

corollary_5: Deduces from Meshulam's bound that, for n sufficiently large and k at least gamma_0 n with gamma_0 about 0.8900, an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the n-cube has at most binom(n,k) members.

theorem_12: Constructs, for every k at most n, an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the n-cube of size at least beta(1-beta)^((1-beta)/beta) 2^n, within a factor e of Meshulam's upper bound.

theorem_3: States the set-pairs inequality that Ellis attributes to Bollobás and uses to bound irredundant families of subcubes: the reciprocal binomial weights of pairs that meet exactly off the diagonal sum to at most one.

theorem_4: Gives Ellis's new proof of Meshulam's bound: an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the n-cube has at most 2^n binom(n,k) divided by the volume of a Hamming ball of radius k members.

theorem_7: Shows that an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the n-cube whose members each have a private vertex in a fixed Hamming ball of radius k has at most binom(n,k) members.

theorem_8: Shows that an irredundant family of k-subcubes of the 2k-cube, each containing the all-zeros or the all-ones vertex, has at most binom(2k,k) members.


Source

David Ellis, “Irredundant families of subcubes,” Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 150(2) (2011), 257–272. Cambridge record, DOI, and arXiv:1003.2960. The copy read for this card is arXiv:1003.2960v1 (15 March 2010; January 2010 manuscript). The 2011 MPCPS citation is later publication metadata; no published-PDF byte identity is claimed. The arXiv record names arXiv's non-exclusive distribution license (arXiv:1003.2960), every other right reserved.

A kk-subcube of {0,1}n\{0,1\}^n fixes n−kn-k coordinates and leaves kk moving. A family is irredundant when each member has a private vertex, meaning a vertex contained in that member and no other member. Write M(n,k)M(n,k) for the maximum size of such a family.

Bounds and constructions

Aharoni and Holzman's upper bound (Proposition 2, p. 4) is

M(n,k)≤∑i=kn(ni)(k≤n).M(n,k)\leq\sum_{i=k}^{n}\binom ni\qquad(k\le n).

Meshulam's stronger bound is

M(n,k)≤2n∑i=0k(ni)(nk)(k≤n).M(n,k)\leq \frac{2^n}{\sum_{i=0}^{k}\binom ni}\binom nk\qquad(k\le n).

The paper's new proof of it uses a private vertex for each subcube and a Bollobás set-pairs inequality. Conjecture 1 (Aharoni–Holzman, p. 2) states that for k>n/2k>n/2 every irredundant family of kk-subcubes of {0,1}n\{0,1\}^n has size at most (nk)\binom nk; the principal family of all kk-subcubes through one fixed vertex attains that value.

Theorem 3 (p. 6) is the set-pairs input: if a1,…,aNa_1,\ldots,a_N and b1,…,bNb_1,\ldots,b_N are subsets of {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} with ai∩bj=∅a_i\cap b_j=\varnothing exactly when i=ji=j, then

∑i(∣ai∣+∣bi∣∣bi∣)−1≤1.\sum_i\binom{|a_i|+|b_i|}{|b_i|}^{-1}\leq1.

Theorem 4 (p. 6) gives the Meshulam bound above. Corollary 5 (p. 8) states that for nn sufficiently large and k≥γ0nk\geq\gamma_0n, where γ0\gamma_0 solves H2(γ0)=12H_2(\gamma_0)=\tfrac12 in (12,1)(\tfrac12,1) and equals 0.89000.8900 to four decimal places, every irredundant family of kk-subcubes has size at most (nk)\binom nk; this is Conjecture 1 in that range, deduced from Meshulam's bound being below (nk)+1\binom nk+1 there. Theorem 7 (p. 9) bounds by (nk)\binom nk an irredundant family whose members each have a private vertex in one fixed Hamming ball of radius kk.

Theorem 8 (p. 12) proves the principal-family bound in the antipodal case n=2kn=2k: if every member contains either 0=(0,…,0)\mathbf 0=(0,\ldots,0) or 1=(1,…,1)\mathbf 1=(1,\ldots,1), then an irredundant family has size at most (2kk)\binom{2k}k. Corollary 10 (p. 14) extends this by induction to all n≤2kn\le2k, with bound (nk)\binom nk.

Finally, with

β=(nk)∑i=0k(ni),\beta=\frac{\binom nk}{\sum_{i=0}^{k}\binom ni},

Theorem 12 (p. 20) supplies, for any k≤nk\le n, an irredundant family of size at least

β(1−β)(1−β)/β2n.\beta(1-\beta)^{(1-\beta)/\beta}2^n.

Thus the Meshulam upper bound and this lower construction differ by a factor at most ee (pp. 21–22).

Results. Labels and pages are those of arXiv:1003.2960v1.

  • Theorem 3 (p. 6): Bollobás's inequality for cross-intersecting set pairs.
  • Theorem 4 (p. 6): Meshulam's upper bound, with the paper's new proof.
  • Corollary 5 (p. 8): the bound (nk)\binom nk for k≥γ0nk\ge\gamma_0n and nn large.
  • Theorem 7 (p. 9): private vertices in one Hamming ball of radius kk.
  • Theorem 8 (p. 12): kk-subcubes of {0,1}2k\{0,1\}^{2k} through 0\mathbf 0 or 1\mathbf 1.
  • Corollary 10 (p. 14): the same bound for all n≤2kn\le2k.
  • Theorem 12 (p. 20): the probabilistic lower bound.

Relation to the library

This is a set-system source for private representatives and a sharp Bollobás-based counting method; the subcube problem itself is separate. The statements recorded here were read against pp. 1–23 of arXiv:1003.2960v1; the result pages record each one's read depth, and none claims a checked proof.

Bears on. #7: background only. No result of this paper concerns congruences.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.