Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 445

../

claims/: The 1 claim page of Problem 445, one per claimant's result; the problem's standing derives from them.


Statement. Is it true that, for any c>1/2c>1/2, if pp is a sufficiently large prime then, for any n≥0n\geq 0, there exist a,b∈(n,n+pc)a,b\in(n,n+p^c) such that $ab\equiv 1\pmod{p}$?

Status. Open. The site's remark (page last edited 27 December 2025) credits Heilbronn, unpublished, with the case of cc sufficiently close to 11 and Heath-Brown with every c>3/4c>3/4. The range c>3/4c>3/4 is recorded as an accepted partial claim on the Browning and Haynes claim page, whose refereed two-interval criterion states the bound that the site and Browning and Haynes credit to Heath-Brown. The standing in the frontmatter derives from the claim pages.

Source. erdosproblems.com/445, accessed 2026-09-04. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #445, https://www.erdosproblems.com/445.

References.

  • [He00] Heath-Brown, D. R., Arithmetic applications of Kloosterman sums. Nieuw Arch. Wiskd. (5) 1 (2000), no. 4 (December 2000), 380-384, a write-up of a Kloosterman centennial lecture, online.

Formalization. Statement in formal-conjectures.

Current assessment

The exact question is open for 1/2<c≤3/41/2<c\leq3/4. The range c>3/4c>3/4 is settled for every translate nn by the Kloosterman-sum method, through Browning and Haynes's 2013 criterion for arbitrary intervals, recorded on the Browning and Haynes claim page as an accepted partial claim with refereed evidence. Heath-Brown's 2000 article has no claim page of its own: it displays the count of solutions of mn≡a(modp)mn\equiv a\pmod p in the origin box 1≤m,n≤M1\le m,n\le M for a general residue aa, and for the problem's residue 11 the origin case is trivial, since a=b=1a=b=1 lies in (0,pc)(0,p^c), so the display settles no instance of the problem; the site's remark and Browning and Haynes credit him with the two-interval bound, which the claim page states in their form. Heath-Brown's article calls improving the exponent 3/43/4 an open problem. The search scope is the site page, the two primary papers, Browning's publication list and a web literature search for a theorem below the exponent 3/43/4, carried out on 2026-09-05 and 2026-09-06; it found no such theorem and no proof claim. Noncoverage by a partial theorem alone does not establish that the remaining range is open, and no later search is recorded.

The proofs of the Heath-Brown estimate and of the Browning–Haynes criterion are not transcribed in the library; the claim page rests on the refereed publication of the criterion, not on a proof review by this corpus.

Known Results

Erdős and Graham, Old and new problems and results in combinatorial number theory (1980), printed p. 89, state the translated-interval question and attribute the case with cc sufficiently close to 11 to Heilbronn, whose proof is unpublished.

Heath-Brown, Arithmetic applications of Kloosterman sums (2000), printed p. 382, gives an origin-rectangle estimate. For a prime p≥3p\geq3, p∤ap\nmid a and 1≤M≤p1\leq M\leq p (a range the print's derivation needs but leaves implicit), writing

Na(M)=#{(m,n):1≤m,n≤M, mn≡a(modp)},N_a(M)=\#\{(m,n):1\leq m,n\leq M,\ mn\equiv a\pmod p\},

the completion lemma for incomplete exponential sums and Weil's bound ∣S(m,k;p)∣≤2p1/2|S(m,k;p)|\leq2p^{1/2} for p∤kp\nmid k give the displayed error bound

∣Na(M)−M2p∣≤2(log⁡p)(1+log⁡p)p1/2<4(log⁡p)2p1/2.\left|N_a(M)-\frac{M^2}{p}\right| \leq2(\log p)(1+\log p)p^{1/2} <4(\log p)^2p^{1/2}.

Consequently the least such scale satisfies M(a)≤2(log⁡p)p3/4M(a)\leq2(\log p)p^{3/4}. The asymptotic count follows, for example, when M2/[p3/2(log⁡p)2]→∞M^2/[p^{3/2}(\log p)^2]\to\infty. This displayed source passage concerns the positive origin rectangle.

Browning and Haynes, Incomplete Kloosterman sums and multiplicative inverses in short intervals, arXiv:1204.6374v1 (28 April 2012), pp. 1–2, state that arbitrary subintervals I1,I2I_1,I_2 of (0,p)(0,p) contain integers x,yx,y with xy≡1(modp)xy\equiv1\pmod p whenever

∣I1∣∣I2∣≥Cp3/2(log⁡p)2|I_1||I_2|\geq C p^{3/2}(\log p)^2

for a sufficiently large absolute constant CC. Theorem 1 on p. 2 recovers this criterion by setting J=1J=1. The article appeared in International Journal of Number Theory 9 (2013), 481–486, DOI 10.1142/S1793042112501448.

Here is the short application to the exact translated question. Fix 3/4<c<13/4<c<1. The integers in (n,n+pc)(n,n+p^c) form a block of pc+O(1)p^c+O(1) consecutive integers, uniformly in nn. Reduce modulo pp, delete residue zero, and take the longer of the at most two nonwrapping components. It contains at least (pc−O(1))/2(p^c-O(1))/2 nonzero consecutive residues. Using that component for both intervals, the ratio of their size product to p3/2(log⁡p)2p^{3/2}(\log p)^2 tends to infinity because 2c−3/2>02c-3/2>0. The criterion produces an inverse pair whose representatives lie in the original open interval. All bounds are uniform in nn. For c≥1c\geq1, apply the established case c=7/8c=7/8 and interval inclusion. Thus every fixed c>3/4c>3/4 is covered. The logarithmic factor prevents this argument from including c=3/4c=3/4.

The short application above is an existing-source deduction, not a solution of the remaining range.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.