Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Problem 555

../


Statement. Let Rk(G)R_k(G) denote the minimal mm such that if the edges of KmK_m are kk-coloured then there is a monochromatic copy of GG. Determine the value of

Rk(C2n).R_k(C_{2n}).

Formulation. The site's wording (page last edited 8 February 2026). Rk(G)R_k(G) is the least forcing order, C2nC_{2n} the cycle on 2n2n vertices with n≥2n\ge2, and the question asks for the function of both kk and nn. The site's commentary attributes to [Er81c] the bounds k1+12n≪Rk(C2n)≪k1+1n−1k^{1+\frac1{2n}}\ll R_k(C_{2n})\ll k^{1+\frac1{n-1}}; as printed, they are Theorems 5 and 6 of Erdős and Graham's 1975 paper, and the upper bound there carries an extra ε\varepsilon in the exponent, k1+(1+ε)/(n−1)k^{1+(1+\varepsilon)/(n-1)} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, so the site's form is the exponent up to o(1)o(1). The 1981 survey, at its pages 9--14, states neither the question nor these bounds (below). The sources write the cycle length as nn where the site writes 2n2n; this page keeps the site's nn and says which is meant where it matters.

Status. Open, in the site's label (OPEN; page last edited 8 February 2026, accessed 2026-09-17). No source determines Rk(C2n)R_k(C_{2n}) for general kk and nn, and the search, whose scope the Current assessment records, found no proof claim; the problem has no claim page and its frontmatter standing is open. What is known: exact values for two colors (all n≥3n\ge3) and for three colors and large nn; for fixed k≥4k\ge4 and large nn the linear bracket (k−1)(2n−2)+2≤Rk(C2n)≤(k−14)2n+o(n)(k-1)(2n-2)+2\le R_k(C_{2n})\le (k-\frac14)2n+o(n) from sources read here, improved to the coefficient k−12k-\frac12 in a later paper not held; for fixed nn and growing kk the polynomial bracket $k^{1+1/2n}\ll R_k(C_{2n})\ll k^{1+(1+\varepsilon)/(n-1)}$, whose upper exponent is the truth, Rk(C2n)=Θ(kn/(n−1))R_k(C_{2n})=\Theta(k^{n/(n-1)}), for n∈{2,3,5}n\in\{2,3,5\} by a refereed paper [LiLih09]; and for C4C_4 the bracket k2+2≤Rk(C4)≤k2+k+1k^2+2\le R_k(C_4)\le k^2+k+1 for prime powers kk. This is a bounded negative finding, not a certificate of openness.

Source. erdosproblems.com/555, accessed 2026-09-17: the problem page (OPEN, which the site qualifies as not resolvable by a finite computation; last edited 8 February 2026; source key [Er81c]; commentary citing [Er81c] and [ChGr75]; OEIS link A389313), its one-comment discussion thread (20 July 2026) and its empty proof-claim tab. Cite as: T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problem #555, https://www.erdosproblems.com/555, accessed 2026-09-17.

References.

  • [Er81c] Erdős, P., Some new problems and results in graph theory and other branches of combinatorial mathematics. Combinatorics and graph theory (Calcutta, 1980), Lecture Notes in Math. 885 (1981), 9--17. Site source key; its pages 9--14 do not state the question or the bounds (p. 13 records the two-color determination and the three-color conjecture). Library home: erdos_1981_new_problems_results_graph_theory_other.
  • [ErGr75] Erdős, P. and Graham, R. L., On partition theorems for finite graphs. Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai 10 (1975), 515--527; Theorems 5 and 6, pp. 521--522, and the C4C_4 statement, p. 523. Library home: erdos_1975_partition_theorems_finite_graphs.
  • [ChGr75] Chung, F. R. K. and Graham, R. L., On multicolor Ramsey numbers for complete bipartite graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 18 (1975), 164--169, DOI 10.1016/0095-8956(75)90043-X. Theorem 3 and Corollary 1, p. 166, with the proof of Theorem 3 on p. 167; the paper is in the publisher's open archive. Library home: chung_graham_1975_multicolor_ramsey_numbers_complete_bipartite; result pages Theorem 3 and Corollary 1.
  • [DJR17] Davies, E., Jenssen, M. and Roberts, B., Multicolour Ramsey numbers of paths and even cycles. European J. Combin. 63 (2017), 124--133, DOI 10.1016/j.ejc.2017.03.002; arXiv:1606.00762v3 (23 February 2017). Theorem 2 and the introduction, p. 2. Library home: davies_2017_multicolour_ramsey_numbers_paths_even_cycles.
  • [KnSu19] Knierim, C. and Su, P., Improved bounds on the multicolor Ramsey numbers of paths and even cycles. arXiv:1801.04128 (12 January 2018); Electron. J. Combin., DOI 10.37236/7614. Not held; known here through its arXiv abstract.
  • [YYFB06] Yongqi, S., Yuansheng, Y., Feng, X. and Bingxi, L., New lower bounds on the multicolor Ramsey numbers Rr(C2m)R_r(C_{2m}). Graphs Combin. 22 (2006), 283--288, DOI 10.1007/s00373-006-0659-y. Not held; its bound is quoted from the publisher's abstract and from [DJR17] p. 2.
  • [BeSk09] Benevides, F. S. and Skokan, J., The 3-colored Ramsey number of even cycles. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 99 (2009), 690--708; the copy read is the CDAM research report LSE-CDAM-2008-17 (2008). Theorem 1. Library home: benevides_2009_3_colored_ramsey_number_even_cycles.
  • [BoEr73] Bondy, J. A. and Erdős, P., Ramsey numbers for cycles in graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 14 (1973), 46--54; the note added in proof, pp. 53--54, records the two-color formula of Faudree and Schelp and of Rosta. Library home: bondy_1973_ramsey_numbers_cycles_graphs.
  • [FaSc74] Faudree, R. J. and Schelp, R. H., All Ramsey numbers for cycles in graphs. Discrete Math. 8 (1974), 313--329, DOI 10.1016/0012-365X(74)90151-4. Not held; quoted second-hand from [BoEr73] and [JeSk21].
  • [Ro73] Rosta, V., On a Ramsey-type problem of J. A. Bondy and P. Erdős, I, II. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 15 (1973), 94--104 and 105--120, DOIs 10.1016/0095-8956(73)90035-X and 10.1016/0095-8956(73)90036-1. Not held; quoted second-hand as for [FaSc74].
  • [JeSk21] Jenssen, M. and Skokan, J., Exact Ramsey numbers of odd cycles via nonlinear optimisation. Adv. Math. 376 (2021), Paper No. 107444; arXiv:1608.05705v1. Context: its p. 2 displays the two-color cycle values. Library home: jenssen_2021_exact_ramsey_numbers_odd_cycles_via.
  • [LiLih09] Li, Y. and Lih, K.-W., Multi-color Ramsey numbers of even cycles. European J. Combin. 30 (2009), 114--118, DOI 10.1016/j.ejc.2008.02.008. Theorem 1, p. 115, with Lemma 1 (p. 115), the bound (2) (p. 114) and Lemma 5 (p. 118); the paper is in the publisher's open archive. Library home: li_lih_2009_multi_color_ramsey_numbers_even_cycles; result page [[../library/ramsey_theory/li_lih_2009_multi_color_ramsey_numbers_even_cycles/theorem_1|Theorem 1]].
  • [Tar24] Taranchuk, V., A new lower bound for the multicolor Ramsey number rk(K2,t+1)r_k(K_{2,t+1}). arXiv:2411.14364 (v1 21 November 2024; v2 23 November 2024). Preprint; Theorem 1.3, p. 3, and the Lazebnik--Woldar bound restated on p. 2. Library home: taranchuk_2024_new_lower_bound_multicolor_ramsey_number.

Formalization. None. No file ErdosProblems/555.lean exists in formal-conjectures (main; none on 2026-09-17 or 2026-10-07), the site's page records no formalized statement, and the community database (teorth/erdosproblems) records the problem as open and unformalized with no formal-proof URL; its OEIS field lists A389313.

Current assessment

The question (site formulation accessed 2026-09-17). The statement above; OPEN; last edited 8 February 2026. The site's commentary attributes the problem to Erdős and Graham, credits Erdős [Er81c] with the bounds $k^{1+\frac1{2n}}\ll R_k(C_{2n})\ll k^{1+\frac1{n-1}}$, and credits Chung and Graham [ChGr75] with the lower bound Rk(C4)>k2−k+1R_k(C_4)>k^2-k+1 for k−1k-1 a prime power and the upper bound Rk(C4)≤k2+k+1R_k(C_4)\le k^2+k+1 for every kk; it lists the problem as #24 in the Ramsey Theory section of the graphs collection. The site links OEIS A389313 (https://oeis.org/A389313), which is the two-color sequence a(n)=R(Cn,Cn)a(n)=R(C_n,C_n), not a multicolor quantity. The thread has one comment (below). The community database record says open (last updated 31 August 2025), unformalized.

Origin and attribution. The two bounds the site quotes are Theorem 5 and Theorem 6 of Erdős and Graham (1975, pp. 521--522): r(C2n;k)>c3(n)k1+1/2nr(C_{2n};k)>c_3(n)k^{1+1/2n} for k,n≥1k,n\ge1, by a random coloring and Nash-Williams's arboricity theorem, and, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 and n≥2n\ge2, r(C2n;k)<c4(ε,n)k1+(1+ε)/(n−1)r(C_{2n};k)<c_4(\varepsilon,n)k^{1+(1+\varepsilon)/(n-1)}, from the Bondy--Simonovits even-cycle theorem; the same page adds r(C2n;k)>(k−1)(n−1)r(C_{2n};k)>(k-1)(n-1) and r(C2n;k)≤201knr(C_{2n};k)\le201kn for k≤10n/(201n)k\le10^n/(201n). Pages 9--14 of the 1981 survey contain no statement about the kk-color numbers of even cycles. Their cycle material is rk(C3)r_k(C_3) (p. 10); the odd-cycle conjecture of Problem 554 and the shortest-odd-cycle problem after it (p. 12); and, on p. 13, the sentence that "V. Rosta and independently Faudree and Schelp determined r(Cn,Cm)r(C_n,C_m) for every nn and mm", the three-color conjecture r(Cn,Cn,Cn)≤4n−3r(C_n,C_n,C_n)\le4n-3 of Problem 556, and the expectation, from the work with Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp, that r(K(n),C4)<n2−εr(K(n),C_4)<n^{2-\varepsilon}, where all they could prove was r(K(n),Cr)<n2−εr(K(n),C_r)<n^{2-\varepsilon} for r≥5r\ge5. The site's attribution is recorded as a discrepancy; the 1975 paper is the source of the bounds, and the survey lists it among its references.

Exact values. Two colors: Bondy and Erdős's note added in proof (pp. 53--54; recorded on the source card), crediting Faudree and Schelp and, independently, Rosta, prints R(Cm,Cn)=n+m/2−1R(C_m,C_n)=n+m/2-1 for 4≤m≤n4\le m\le n with m,nm,n even, except for R(C4,C4)R(C_4,C_4), so R2(C2n)=3n−1R_2(C_{2n})=3n-1 for n≥3n\ge3; Jenssen and Skokan (p. 2) print the same value; Davies, Jenssen and Roberts (p. 2) print "3n/2+13n/2+1 for even n≥6n\ge6" in their notation, which disagrees by two with the other two printings and with R(C6,C6)=8R(C_6,C_6)=8 recorded by Bondy and Erdős, and is read as a misprint. The primary papers [FaSc74] and [Ro73] are not held. Three colors: Benevides and Skokan's Theorem 1 (J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 99 (2009), refereed; the locators are those of the CDAM report) gives R3(Cm)=2mR_3(C_m)=2m for all sufficiently large even mm, that is R3(C2n)=4nR_3(C_{2n})=4n for large nn, confirming the asymptotic 2m+o(m)2m+o(m) of Figaj and Łuczak; the threshold is not effective. Four or more colors: no exact value is known to any source read; Davies, Jenssen and Roberts write "For k≥4k\ge4 colours, again very little is known" ([DJR17], introduction, p. 2).

Fixed kk, growing nn. Lower bound: the construction of Yongqi, Yuansheng, Feng and Bingxi, Rk(Cm)≥(k−1)(m−2)+2R_k(C_m)\ge(k-1)(m-2)+2 for even mm and any kk, that is Rk(C2n)≥(k−1)(2n−2)+2R_k(C_{2n})\ge(k-1)(2n-2)+2, known second-hand, as restated on Davies, Jenssen and Roberts's p. 2 and confirmed against the publisher's abstract of [YYFB06] (which writes Rr(C2m)≥2(r−1)(m−1)+2R_r(C_{2m})\ge2(r-1)(m-1)+2). Upper bounds: Łuczak, Simonovits and Skokan's km+o(m)km+o(m) and Sárközy's $(k-\frac k{16k^3+1})m+o(m)$ (both second-hand from [DJR17] p. 2); Davies--Jenssen--Roberts Theorem 2 (arXiv v3 p. 2; European J. Combin. 63 (2017), refereed): Rk(Cm)≤(k−14)m+o(m)R_k(C_m)\le(k-\frac14)m+o(m) for k≥4k\ge4 and even mm; and Knierim and Su's improvement to (k−12+o(1))m(k-\frac12+o(1))m for paths and even cycles (arXiv:1801.04128, known here through its abstract; published in Electron. J. Combin.; the paper is not held, and its hypotheses on kk are not recorded here). The linear coefficient therefore lies in [k−1,k−12][k-1,k-\frac12] for large nn; [DJR17] (pp. 2--3) reports its path lower bounds as thought closer to the truth than its upper bound, without naming the coefficient it expects.

Fixed nn, growing kk. The Erdős--Graham bracket k1+1/2n≪nRk(C2n)≪ε,nk1+(1+ε)/(n−1)k^{1+1/2n}\ll_nR_k(C_{2n})\ll_{\varepsilon,n}k^{1+(1+\varepsilon)/(n-1)} above. For n∈{2,3,5}n\in\{2,3,5\} the upper exponent is the truth: Li and Lih's Theorem 1 (p. 115; European J. Combin. 30 (2009), refereed), "Fix m=2,3m=2,3, or 55. The order of magnitude of rk(C2m)r_k(C_{2m}) is km/(m−1)k^{m/(m-1)} as k→∞k\to\infty", gives Rk(C2n)=Θ(kn/(n−1))R_k(C_{2n})=\Theta(k^{n/(n-1)}) for C4C_4, C6C_6 and C10C_{10}, which is what the thread comment of 20 July 2026 (the site does not verify comments) attributes to the paper. Its lower bound is an algebraic qn−1q^{n-1}-coloring of Kqn,qnK_{q^n,q^n} with no monochromatic C2nC_{2n} (Lemmas 4 and 5, pp. 117--118), carried to KNK_N by a halving argument (Lemma 1, p. 115); its upper bound is the paper's display (2) (p. 114), rk(C2m)≤c(m)km/(m−1)r_k(C_{2m})\le c(m)k^{m/(m-1)} for every m≥2m\ge2, stated as "easy to see" from the Bondy--Simonovits even-cycle theorem without a printed argument, which removes the ε\varepsilon from the Erdős--Graham upper exponent for all nn if accepted. The paper (p. 115) also notes that the order km/(m−1)k^{m/(m-1)} for rk(C2m)r_k(C_{2m}) would imply the order n1+1/mn^{1+1/m} for ex(n;C2m)ex(n;C_{2m}), which it records as proved for m∈{2,3,5}m\in\{2,3,5\}. No constant is stated.

The four-cycle. The site's Chung--Graham bounds are Theorem 3 (p. 166; J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 18 (1975), refereed), "For k−1k-1 a prime power, r(K2,2;k)>k2−k+1r(K_{2,2};k)>k^2-k+1", proved on p. 167 by coloring Kk2−k+1K_{k^2-k+1} from a difference set modulo k2−k+1k^2-k+1, and Corollary 1 (p. 166), "r(K2,2;k)≤k2+k+1r(K_{2,2};k)\le k^2+k+1 for k>1k>1", stated without proof as a refinement of the paper's Theorem 1; the paper's r(G;k)r(G;k) is the least forcing order, the site's Rk(G)R_k(G). The printed hypothesis of Theorem 3 is the one the site states, k−1k-1 a prime power; Erdős and Graham (1975, p. 523) printed the lower bound "for k=k= prime power", citing the Chung--Graham paper that their reference list (p. 527) marks "to appear", and that condition is theirs, not the published theorem's. The site states the upper bound for every kk, omitting the printed k>1k>1, which is needed since R1(C4)=4R_1(C_4)=4. Lazebnik and Woldar's Rk(C4)≥k2+2R_k(C_4)\ge k^2+2 for odd prime powers kk (known second-hand from Taranchuk's p. 2) and Taranchuk's Theorem 1.3 (arXiv v1 p. 3; preprint) for k=2ek=2^e give k2+2≤Rk(C4)≤k2+k+1k^2+2\le R_k(C_4)\le k^2+k+1 for every prime power kk; Taranchuk's p. 7 records equality Rk(C4)=k2+2R_k(C_4)=k^2+2 for k=2,3,4k=2,3,4 and the open case 27≤R5(C4)≤2927\le R_5(C_4)\le29. The arXiv listing's v2 comment says Taranchuk's result had already been proved by Lazebnik and Mubayi; that paper's reference was not located.

Search scope. The status rests on these routes; none found a general determination or a proof claim.

  • The site: problem page, discussion thread and proof-claim tab; the community database record; the formal-conjectures directory on main (no file 555); OEIS A389313.
  • The primary sources, at the pages stated: [ErGr75] pp. 521--523; [Er81c] pp. 9--14; [DJR17] pp. 1--3 and 12; [BoEr73] pp. 53--54; [Tar24] pp. 1--3 and 7; [JeSk21] p. 2; and, after the search, [ChGr75] pp. 164--169 (pp. 166--167 for the C4C_4 results) and [LiLih09] pp. 114--118 (p. 115 for Theorem 1).
  • arXiv: the API listing for 1606.00762 (v1--v3, DOI), 1801.04128 (v1 only, abstract) and 2411.14364 (v1, v2 with its comment); the metadata search abs:Ramsey AND abs:"even cycles" restricted to multicolor terms (9 records; the two on this quantity are [DJR17] and [KnSu19]; the 2026 items are size-Ramsey and bipartite-Ramsey papers).
  • Crossref records for [DJR17], [LiLih09], [YYFB06], [FaSc74], [Ro73] and [ChGr75] (which settled the paper's DOI).
  • Semantic Scholar citation list of [DJR17] (16 records, scanned by title; besides [KnSu19] they concern bipartite, random or hypergraph variants).
  • The publishers' open archives for [ChGr75] and [LiLih09]; [YYFB06] is not held.

Not searched: MathSciNet, zbMATH, Google Scholar, X. Not held: [YYFB06], [KnSu19], [FaSc74], [Ro73], the Lazebnik--Woldar and Lazebnik--Mubayi papers.

Remaining gaps. (1) No general formula; for k≥4k\ge4 even the linear coefficient is unknown. (2) [ChGr75], the source of the C4C_4 bounds, prints in its Theorem 3 the condition "k−1k-1 a prime power" as the site does, so the differing condition on [ErGr75] p. 523 is that paper's printing, and its Corollary 1 needs k>1k>1. (3) [LiLih09]'s Theorem 1 confirms the thread comment for n∈{2,3,5}n\in\{2,3,5\}, and its upper bound (2) is stated without proof. [KnSu19], a best-known-bound source, is known here only through its abstract. (4) The two-color value rests on second-hand printings, one of which is a misprint. (5) The site's attribution of the bounds to [Er81c] could not be located in the survey's pages 9--14. (6) Proof coverage: statements only, claims checked; nothing is reviewed.

Linked library material

These entries are derived from explicit links on library pages. They are navigation only and do not by themselves record mathematical progress.