Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Erdos 1997 some old new problems various branches combinatorics

../

section_10: Item 10 of Erdős's 1997 problem paper, the finite non-dividing problem of Problem 131: f(n) < c n^{1/2} is easy, a Budapest student showed f(n) > c n^{1/5}, and Erdős asks whether f(n) > n^{1/2 - epsilon}; no construction is printed.

section_2: Item 2 of Erdős's 1997 problem paper, the origin passage of Problem 129: the Erdős–Gyárfás function f_k^{(r)}(n), the probabilistic lower bound (1), the conjectured upper bound (2) of order exp(c n^{1/2}) for r = 2, k = 3, and the expected two-sided bound (3) with exponent 1/(k-1).

section_9: Item 9 of Erdős's 1997 problem paper: the infinite property-P questions of Problem 12 (a growth question, the exponent question and the reciprocal-sum question) and the finite conjecture of Problem 13 in the form max k ≤ m/3 + O(1) with the example 2m/3 < a_i ≤ m.


Paul Erdős, Some old and new problems in various branches of combinatorics, Discrete Mathematics 165/166 (1997), 227--231, PII S0012-365X(96)00173-2, DOI 10.1016/S0012-365X(96)00173-2; the author at the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, with the footnote "Sadly, the author passed away on September 20, 1996" (p. 227). Cited as [Er97b] on the problem pages. The paper is a problem paper in twelve numbered items with no reference list; its bibliographic citations are the 1946 Monthly paper named in item 11 and, in item 9, the 1970 Erdős--Sárközy paper "On the divisibility properties of sequences of integers", printed with the volume "9" where the paper is Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 21 (1970), 97--101, filed as erdos_1970_divisibility_properties_sequences_integers. An earlier paper of Erdős carries the same title (Congressus Numerantium 23 (1979), 19--37, the site's key Er79g), filed as erdos_1979_some_old_new_problems_various_branches_combinatorics; the two texts share item 1's triangle conjecture, which the 1979 typescript states as item 7.IV on its page headed 16 (PDF p. 15) for a graph on nn vertices every [n/2][n/2] of whose vertices span more than [n2/50][n^2/50] edges, item 1's form at 10n10n vertices (Problem 128). Filed under integer_sequences as the home of items 9 and 10 (Problems 12, 13 and 131); the paper spans graph theory, Ramsey theory, combinatorial number theory and distance geometry.

The copy read for this card is the publisher's open-archive scan of the printed article: 5 pages, printed pp. 227--231 = PDF pp. 1--5 (printed p. nn is PDF p. n−226n-226), a 2003 capture (made with the Acrobat 3.0 Capture plug-in, created September 2003) with an OCR text layer that locates passages and garbles the displays, the sub- and superscripts and the Hungarian diacritics. It is the article's PDF in the publisher's open archive, at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012365X96001732/pdf (the DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(96)00173-2 resolves to the same article), as served on 2026-09-22; 400,153 bytes. The copy read prints "© 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved" in the footer of its first page (printed p. 227), every other right reserved; the Crossref record for the DOI (read 2026-10-07) names Elsevier's text-and-data-mining user license (https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/, from 1 March 1997) and, from 17 July 2013, its open-archive user license (https://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/), which permits non-commercial access, download and copying but not redistribution: the publisher's terms rather than a reuse grant, and no Creative Commons license.

Read status: the whole paper (PDF pp. 1--5) was read on the page images. Claims checked, clause by clause on the page images, for item 2 (p. 228), the Hajnal and Mihók conjectures of item 3 (p. 228), item 4 (pp. 228--229), items 5 and 6 (p. 229), the definition, the conjecture and Simonovits's graph in item 7 (p. 229), items 9 and 10 (pp. 230--231) and items 11 and 12 (p. 231). Items 1 and 8 and the rest of items 3 and 7 were read on the page images for the statements summarized under Contents, not clause by clause. The paper prints no proof: every result it mentions is reported ("we proved", "Simonovits found", "showed") without argument or reference, and nothing here is checked or independently reviewed.

Contents

  1. Triangles and dense subgraphs (p. 227). The question, open "for several decades" with a prize offered: must every graph on 10n10n vertices, every 5n5n of whose vertices span (the paper writes "contains (or induces)") more than 2n22n^2 edges, contain a triangle? The bound would be sharp: the pentagon blown up by independent sets of 2n2n vertices is a triangle-free G(10n;20n2)G(10n;20n^2) whose 5n5n-sets span at least 2n22n^2 edges, and Simonovits's Petersen graph blown up by nn-sets is a triangle-free G(10n;15n2)G(10n;15n^2) with the same property; the paper calls it possible that these two are the only such graphs. With Győri: the least ene_n for which some G(10n;en)G(10n;e_n) has every 5n5n-set spanning at least 2n22n^2 edges is (1+o(1))8n2(1+o(1))8n^2, the exact value undetermined; for n=1n=1 the paper calls it easy that 12 edges are needed, with K4K_4 plus two K3K_3's extremal (conjectured unique); for 20 vertices four disjoint K5K_5's with 40 edges are conjectured extremal, the cases not having been checked; and a graph on 4n4n vertices in which any 2n2n vertices span at least n(n−1)n(n-1) edges has at least 4n2−2n4n^2-2n edges, with equality for two disjoint K2nK_{2n}'s.
  2. The Erdős--Gyárfás Ramsey function (p. 228, page section_2). fk(r)(n)f_k^{(r)}(n) is the largest NN for which KNK_N has an rr-coloring of its edges in which every nn-vertex subset spans a monochromatic KkK_k of every color; r=k=2r=k=2 is the ordinary Ramsey problem. For r=2r=2, k=3k=3 the authors proved by the probability method the lower bound (1) f3(r)(n)>exp⁡(c1n1/2)f_3^{(r)}(n)>\exp(c_1n^{1/2}) and conjectured, without proof, the upper bound (2) f3(r)(n)<exp⁡(c2n1/2)f_3^{(r)}(n)<\exp(c_2n^{1/2}), which they expected Ramsey-theoretic methods to give but could not obtain; they call the two-sided bound (3) exp⁡(c1(r)n1/k−1)<fk(r)(n)<exp⁡(c2(r)n1/k−1)\exp(c_1^{(r)}n^{1/k-1})<f_k^{(r)}(n)<\exp(c_2^{(r)}n^{1/k-1}) very likely, its lower half probably following from the probabilistic proof, and defer related problems to a separate paper with Gyárfás. The displays (1) and (2) keep the superscript (r)(r) although r=2r=2 was fixed, the printed "We investigated the use of r=2r=2, k=3k=3" has "the use of" where "the case" is meant, and the exponent of (3) is printed "1/k−11/k-1"; read as 1/(k−1)1/(k-1) it gives the 1/21/2 of (1) and (2) at k=3k=3. No proof of (1) is printed and the separate paper is not identified.
  3. Cycle lengths in sparse graphs and in graphs of infinite chromatic number (p. 228). Is there a density-zero sequence a1<a2<⋯a_1<a_2<\cdots, with an absolute constant cc, such that each graph with nn vertices and cncn edges has a cycle whose length is one of the aia_i? Probably ai=2ia_i=2^i fails, and the paper asks about ai=i2a_i=i^2 and pi±1p_i\pm1; Bollobás proved Erdős's conjecture that an arithmetic progression containing even numbers has such a cc, the best cc unknown. The infinite-chromatic form: is there a density-0 sequence such that any graph with infinite chromatic number has cycles whose lengths are aia_i for infinitely many ii? The "very old" Erdős--Hajnal conjecture: if GG has infinite chromatic number and b1<b2<⋯b_1<b_2<\cdots are the odd cycle lengths occurring in GG, "Is it true that ∑1/bi=∞\sum1/b_i=\infty?", and perhaps the bib_i have positive upper density; that the lower density can be 0 is called well known. With no progress on it, Erdős and Mihók conjectured more than ten years earlier that a graph of infinite chromatic number contains cycles of length 2k2^k for infinitely many kk; the paper allows 2k2^k to be replaced by any sequence of far slower growth, k2k^2 for instance, and reports no progress on that either. The Erdős--Gyárfás question whether minimum degree 3 forces a cycle of length 2k2^k: the authors are "convinced now that this is false", expecting for every rr graphs of minimum degree rr with no cycle of length 2k2^k, but found no counterexample even for r=3r=3; a prize for "a satisfactory answer" to the problems opening the item.
  4. The Erdős--Hajnal--Szemerédi problem (pp. 228--229), "forgotten and neglected", quoted: "Let f(n)→∞f(n)\to\infty arbitrarily slowly. Is it true that there is a GG of infinite chromatic number every induced subgraph of nn vertices of which can be made bipartite by the omission of fewer than f(n)f(n) edges?" Erdős knows of no answer even for f(n)=n1/2f(n)=n^{1/2}, and offers prizes for a proof that such a graph exists and for a disproof.
  5. The integer-distance graph (p. 229), asked with Andrásfai some years earlier: for an infinite plane set S\mathscr S with no three points collinear and no four concyclic, join two points when their distance is an integer. The questions, quoted from p. 229: "Can the chromatic number of this graph be infinite? If the answer is negative how large can the chromatic number be? What is the largest complete graph that this graph can contain?" Erdős leaves open whether the graph can have an infinite complete subgraph, allowing that he may "overlook a trivial point".
  6. Largest bipartite subgraphs (p. 229), asked with Kohayakawa (printed "Kohayakava") and Gyárfás: f(e)f(e) is the largest integer such that every graph with ee edges contains a bipartite subgraph with f(e)f(e) edges. A result of Edwards gives (4) f(e)≥e2+(8e)1/28f(e)\ge\frac e2+\frac{(8e)^{1/2}}8, sharp when e=(r2)e=\binom r2 and the graph is complete; the authors could not decide whether (5) f(e)−e2−(8e)1/28→∞f(e)-\frac e2-\frac{(8e)^{1/2}}8\to\infty along infinitely many ee. Noga Alon recently proved, for e=(r2)+r2e=\binom r2+\frac r2, (6) f(e)>(r2)+(8e)1/28+ce1/4f(e)>\binom r2+\frac{(8e)^{1/2}}8+ce^{1/4}, the largest possible cc unknown. Filing observations, not review verdicts: Edwards's bound has the form e2+8e+1−18\frac e2+\frac{\sqrt{8e+1}-1}8, and the printed (4) drops the +1+1 under the root and the −1-1 after it; the printed (6) has (r2)\binom r2 where the form of (4) and (5) calls for e2\frac e2 (with e=(r2)+r2e=\binom r2+\frac r2, (r2)\binom r2 exceeds e2\frac e2 by about e2\frac e2, and for large ee not every graph of ee edges has a bipartite subgraph that large: Kr+1K_{r+1} less r2\frac r2 edges has ee edges and no bipartite subgraph of more than e2+r2\frac e2+\frac r2 edges, fewer than (r2)\binom r2 once r>4r>4), so the display is read here as a misprint for f(e)>e2+(8e)1/28+ce1/4f(e)>\frac e2+\frac{(8e)^{1/2}}8+ce^{1/4}.
  7. Triangle-free graphs of diameter two (pp. 229--230). f(n)f(n) is the least possible maximum degree of a triangle-free graph G(n)G(n) on nn vertices with diameter two. Erdős and Pach had earlier conjectured f(n)/n1/2→∞f(n)/n^{1/2}\to\infty; Erdős, who had forgotten it, saw no construction with f(n)=o(n)f(n)=o(n), and Simonovits found a Kneser graph with f(n)<n1−cf(n)<n^{1-c}: the vertices are the mm-subsets AiA_i of a set SS with ∣S∣=3m−1|S|=3m-1 (printed "S=3m−1S=3m-1"), AiA_i and AjA_j joined when Ai∩Aj=∅A_i\cap A_j=\emptyset; every vertex has degree (2m−1m)\binom{2m-1}m, the paper calls the absence of triangles and the diameter two easy to check, and it reports that a short calculation gives f(n)<n1−cf(n)<n^{1-c} for n=(3m−1m)n=\binom{3m-1}m. The paper raises the possibility that this graph minimizes f(n)f(n), concedes that the guess may fail, and advises looking for a counterexample first. (A computation made here, not in the paper: (2m−1m)\binom{2m-1}m is 4m+o(m)4^{m+o(m)} and (3m−1m)\binom{3m-1}m is (27/4)m+o(m)(27/4)^{m+o(m)}, so the degree is nlog⁡4/log⁡(27/4)+o(1)=n0.726…+o(1)n^{\log4/\log(27/4)+o(1)}=n^{0.726\ldots+o(1)}, above n1/2n^{1/2}; the graph gives f(n)<n1−cf(n)<n^{1-c} and does not decide the n1/2n^{1/2} conjecture either way.) Then, with Gyárfás: h(G)h(G) is the least number of edges whose addition to a triangle-free G(n)G(n) gives a triangle-free graph of diameter two; "we proved that max⁡h2n(G)=(n−1)2\max h_{2n}(G)=(n-1)^2", the proof "not quite trivial" and to be written up; with dn(G)d_n(G) the maximum degree, dn(G)<clog⁡n/log⁡log⁡nd_n(G)<c\log n/\log\log n implies hn(G)=o(n2)h_n(G)=o(n^2) (7); the hope that (7) holds under dn(G)<n1/2−εd_n(G)<n^{1/2-\varepsilon} (8), perhaps under dn(G)<cn1/2d_n(G)<cn^{1/2} for small cc, while, the paper reports, an easy construction of Simonovits makes (8) fail for large cc.
  8. Two old problems on triangles (p. 230): whether every triangle-free graph on 5n5n vertices can be made bipartite by deleting at most n2n^2 edges (the blown-up pentagon is extremal if so), and whether it has at most n5n^5 pentagons, with Győri's 1.03n51.03n^5 "further improved by Füredi".
  9. Sequences with property P (p. 230, page section_9). With Sárközy, recently: an infinite sequence a1<a2<⋯a_1<a_2<\cdots has property P when no aia_i divides the sum of two other terms (printed "two other an′a'_n"). Three questions: is there a sequence with property P satisfying, as printed, "an>n2a_n>n^2 for all n>n0n>n_0"; does each such sequence have an>n1+ca_n>n^{1+c} infinitely often once c>0c>0 is small enough (the paper's "perhaps"); and does ∑1/an\sum1/a_n converge for every such sequence (its "probably", the sum printed over ama_m). The example an=pn2a_n=p_n^2 with pn≡3(mod4)p_n\equiv3\pmod4 has property P but, the paper says, grows "just a little too fast". Then the old Erdős--Sárközy finite problem: for a1<a2<⋯<ak≤ma_1<a_2<\cdots<a_k\le m with no aia_i dividing the sum of two larger aa's, "Is it true that max⁡k≤m/3+0(1)\max k\le m/3+0(1) [sic]?", the integers 2m/3<ai≤m2m/3<a_i\le m showing that the conjecture would be best possible. The 1970 paper is cited, followed by "This paper is dedicated to the memory of Littlewood"; the 1970 paper itself is headed In memory of H. Davenport (p. 97). Filing observations: the infinite version is printed with "two other" where the 1970 paper and the finite version here have "two larger"; the first question's "an>n2a_n>n^2" reads against its own next sentence, since pn2p_n^2 already exceeds n2n^2 and is called "a little too fast", so the intended question is read here as whether an<n2a_n<n^2 (equivalently ∣A∩[1,N]∣>N1/2|A\cap[1,N]|>N^{1/2}) is possible for all large nn; and no prize is printed for either question.
  10. Non-dividing sets (pp. 230--231, page section_10). Another very recent Erdős--Sárközy problem: for a sequence of integers a1<a2<⋯<ak≤ma_1<a_2<\cdots<a_k\le m in which no aia_i divides any sum of distinct other terms, f(n)f(n) is the largest possible length (printed "Put max⁡h=f(n)\max h=f(n)"); f(n)<cn1/2f(n)<cn^{1/2} "is easy", "Sándor Csaba a young student at the University of Budapest" showed f(n)>cn1/5f(n)>cn^{1/5}, and the question is whether f(n)>n1/2−εf(n)>n^{1/2-\varepsilon}; many related questions can be asked. The passage mixes mm with nn and kk with hh; no construction, proof or reference is printed for either bound. The student's name is printed in the Hungarian order, family name first, so the given name is Csaba and the family name Sándor; the site's phrase "Csaba's construction" takes the given name for the surname. That this is the C. Sándor among the authors of the 1999 paper of Erdős, Lev, Rauzy, Sándor and Sárközy, filed as erdos_1999_greedy_algorithm_arithmetic_progressions_subset_sums, is an identification made here from the name and the place, not a statement of either paper.
  11. Distinct distances and their multiplicities (p. 231), with Pach: for mm points x1,…,xmx_1,\ldots,x_m in the plane with distinct distances d1>d2>⋯≥dkd_1>d_2>\cdots\ge d_k, Erdős's 1946 problem (Amer. Math. Monthly) asks for k>cn/(log⁡n)1/2k>cn/(\log n)^{1/2}, with a prize offered for a proof or disproof; Pannwitz (printed "Erica Pannowitz") proved that the diameter d1d_1 occurs at most nn times. Erdős and Pach ask whether, for n>4n>4, every other distance can occur more than nn times ("We believe that the answer is no!"), and whether there can be c1nc_1n distances each occurring more than nn times; many related questions can be asked. The passage writes mm points and then nn.
  12. Four points, five distances (p. 231). For mm points x1,…,xmx_1,\ldots,x_m in the plane any four of which determine at least five distinct distances, Erdős's older conjecture is that such a set has at least c1m2c_1m^2 distinct distances; unable to settle it, he proposes the stronger conjecture that some c2mc_2m of the points have all their mutual distances different, and offers a prize for settling the question either way. On a line: with V. T. Sós, a subset of n/2n/2 points with all distances distinct; Gyárfás and Lehel proved (12+ε)n(\frac12+\varepsilon)n for a small fixed ε>0\varepsilon>0 and that ε\varepsilon "cannot be greater than 110\frac1{10}". Then, with Gyárfás: f(n)f(n) is the least number of colors in an edge coloring of the complete graph k(n)k(n) in which every k(4)k(4) receives at least 5 colors; the authors observed (9) 23n<f(n)<n\frac23n<f(n)<n and prove f(9)=8f(9)=8; Erdős expected the truth to lie nearer the upper bound of (9), Gyárfás nearer the lower, and "Neither of us had much evidence." The paper closes by asking how large a totally multicolored (rainbow) complete subgraph such a coloring of k(n)k(n) must contain.

Compiled scope

The paper is compiled at statement depth for the passages the citing problem pages consume: item 2 (Problem 129), item 9 (Problems 12 and 13) and item 10 (Problem 131) are summarized above and paged; items 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 12 are summarized above for Problems 57, 63, 74, 130, 127, 133, 89, 132, 756, 135 and 136. The paper proves nothing, so no proof was read and nothing is independently reviewed; the results it reports (the probabilistic bound (1), Simonovits's graph, the student's n1/5n^{1/5} construction, Alon's (6), the Gyárfás--Lehel bound, f(9)=8f(9)=8) rest on the author's word here.

Bears on. #129: item 2 (printed p. 228, PDF p. 2, page image) is the origin passage of the problem: the function fk(r)(n)f_k^{(r)}(n), whose value plus one is the site's R(n;k,r)R(n;k,r), the probabilistic lower bound (1) f3(r)(n)>exp⁡(c1n1/2)f_3^{(r)}(n)>\exp(c_1n^{1/2}), the conjecture (2) f3(r)(n)<exp⁡(c2n1/2)f_3^{(r)}(n)<\exp(c_2n^{1/2}), which is the site's displayed statement, and the expectation (3) with exponent 1/(k−1)1/(k-1), the site's C1n1/k−1<R(n;k,r)<C2n1/k−1C_1^{n^{1/k-1}}<R(n;k,r)<C_2^{n^{1/k-1}}; the site transcribes the paper faithfully, and the random-coloring argument on the problem page refutes (2) as printed. No proof of (1) is printed, and the joint paper with Gyárfás that the item promises is not identified. #12: item 9 (p. 230, PDF p. 4, page image), the infinite property-P sequence with the growth question (printed "an>n2a_n>n^2 for all n>n0n>n_0", read as an<n2a_n<n^2), the exponent question (an>n1+ca_n>n^{1+c} for infinitely many nn) and the reciprocal-sum question (∑1/an<∞\sum1/a_n<\infty for every sequence with property P, "probably"), the problem's three questions in order; the example an=pn2a_n=p_n^2, pn≡3(mod4)p_n\equiv3\pmod4; property P printed with "two other" in place of "two larger". #13: item 9 (p. 230, PDF p. 4, page image), the finite conjecture max⁡k≤m/3+O(1)\max k\le m/3+O(1) for a1<a2<⋯<ak≤ma_1<a_2<\cdots<a_k\le m with no aia_i dividing the sum of two larger aa's, with the example 2m/3<ai≤m2m/3<a_i\le m showing it best possible, the site's N/3+O(1)N/3+O(1) form of the conjecture with the half-open example; no prize is printed, so this is not the "final open problems paper" in which, by Bedert's account (p. 2), Erdős offers a prize. #131: item 10 (pp. 230--231, PDF pp. 4--5, page images), the finite non-dividing problem: f(n)<cn1/2f(n)<cn^{1/2} "is easy", the Budapest student's f(n)>cn1/5f(n)>cn^{1/5}, and the question whether f(n)>n1/2−εf(n)>n^{1/2-\varepsilon}, the problem's displayed question; the site's p. 230 locator for "Csaba's construction" points at an attribution with no construction printed. #130: item 5 (p. 229, PDF p. 3, page image), the Andrásfai--Erdős integer-distance graph on an infinite plane set with no three points on a line and no four on a circle, the questions whether its chromatic number can be infinite, how large it can be otherwise, and the largest complete subgraph, in the site's wording. #133: item 7 (p. 229, PDF p. 3, page image), the definition of f(n)f(n), the Erdős--Pach conjecture f(n)/n1/2→∞f(n)/n^{1/2}\to\infty and Simonovits's Kneser graph with f(n)<n1−cf(n)<n^{1-c} for n=(3m−1m)n=\binom{3m-1}m; the graph's degree is about n0.73n^{0.73}, so the paper leaves the problem's question open and the page's status rests on its other sources. #135: item 12 (p. 231, PDF p. 5, page image), the conjecture that mm points any four of which determine at least five distinct distances determine at least c1m2c_1m^2 distinct distances, with the prize offer, the problem's statement and prize; the stronger conjecture of c2mc_2m points with all distances distinct. #57: item 3 (p. 228, PDF p. 2, page image), the Erdős--Hajnal conjecture "Is it true that ∑1/bi=∞\sum1/b_i=\infty?" for the odd cycle lengths of a graph of infinite chromatic number, with the upper-density question, one of the site's keys for the problem. #63: item 3 (p. 228, PDF p. 2, page image), the Erdős--Mihók conjecture that a graph of infinite chromatic number contains cycles of length 2k2^k for infinitely many kk, one of the site's keys for the problem. #74: item 4 (pp. 228--229, PDF pp. 2--3, page images), the Erdős--Hajnal--Szemerédi question with the two prize offers; the paper asks it of induced subgraphs on nn vertices made bipartite by deleting fewer than f(n)f(n) edges, where the problem page has finite subgraphs and at most f(n)f(n) edges; the problem page does not cite this paper. #127: item 6 (p. 229, PDF p. 3, page image), the function f(e)f(e), the Edwards bound (4), the question (5) and Alon's (6) as printed (see the filing observations above); the problem page cites this paper as [Er97b] for item 6's question and the Erdős--Gyárfás--Kohayakawa paper in Discrete Math. 177 (1997) as [EGK97]. #89: item 11 (p. 231, PDF p. 5, page image), the 1946 problem k>cn/(log⁡n)1/2k>cn/(\log n)^{1/2} with the prize offer; the problem page does not cite this paper. #132: item 11 (p. 231, PDF p. 5, page image), the question whether for n>4n>4 every distance other than the diameter can occur more than nn times, which the authors believe impossible, the problem's first question in the complementary form (with Pannwitz's bound on the diameter, a second distance occurring at most nn times is the same as some non-diameter distance doing so); the problem page does not cite this paper. #756: item 11 (p. 231, PDF p. 5, page image), the question whether there can be c1nc_1n distances each occurring more than nn times, the problem's question; the problem page cites this paper as [Er97b] for the restatement of the Erdős--Pach questions. #136: item 12 (p. 231, PDF p. 5, page image), the Erdős--Gyárfás function f(n)f(n) for colorings in which every K4K_4 gets at least 5 colors, the bounds (9) 23n<f(n)<n\frac23n<f(n)<n, f(9)=8f(9)=8 and the authors' opposite guesses; the problem page cites this paper as [Er97b] for item 12.

Results.

  • Item 2 (p. 228): the function fk(r)(n)f_k^{(r)}(n), the bound (1), the conjecture (2) and the expectation (3).
  • Item 9 (p. 230): the infinite property-P questions and the finite conjecture max⁡k≤m/3+O(1)\max k\le m/3+O(1).
  • Item 10 (pp. 230--231): the non-dividing function with f(n)<cn1/2f(n)<cn^{1/2}, the student's f(n)>cn1/5f(n)>cn^{1/5} and the question f(n)>n1/2−εf(n)>n^{1/2-\varepsilon}.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.