Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated

Erdos 1978 size ramsey number

../

section_8: The 1978 paper's open question whether the balanced complete bipartite graphs form an o-sequence, with its bounds on the diagonal size Ramsey number and the bounds it lists for the four Problem B families.

theorem_6: The 1978 bounds for the size Ramsey number of the complete bipartite graph with a fixed part of size m and a large part of size n.


P. Erdős, R. J. Faudree, C. C. Rousseau, R. H. Schelp: The size Ramsey number, Period. Math. Hungar. 9 (1978), 145--161 (MR 479691; Zentralblatt 331.05122).

The paper is Period. Math. Hungar. 9 (1978), no. 1-2, 145-161, DOI 10.1007/BF02018930, received March 16, 1976. The copy read for this card is the Rényi archive's 17-page OmniPage scan of the journal article (printed p. n is PDF p. n-144) whose OCR text layer garbles the formulas; the statements consumed below were read on the page images of pp. 145, 146, 150, 154, 160 and 161. The paper writes hat-r for the size Ramsey number and reserves hat-R(G_1,G_2) for C(r(G_1,G_2),2); the site's problem pages write hat-R for the size Ramsey number. No notice is printed on the scanned journal pages; the publisher's article page (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02018930, read 2026-10-02) shows the site footer "© 2026 Springer Nature", a "Reprints and permissions" link and a paywalled article, and names no Creative Commons or open access license, every other right reserved.

Read status: claims checked for the definitions (p. 146), Problems A and B (p. 150), Theorem 6 (p. 154), the Section 8 question and bounds (pp. 160-161) and the closing path passage (p. 161); no proof checked.

The paper defines the size Ramsey number hat-r(G_1,G_2) as the minimum of |E(G)| over all graphs G with G -> (G_1,G_2), compares it with hat-R(G_1,G_2) = C(r(G_1,G_2),2), and calls a sequence of graphs an o-sequence when hat-r(G_n) = o(hat-R(G_n)). Theorem 1, attributed to Chvátal, shows hat-r(K_m,K_n) = hat-R(K_m,K_n) for all m and n, and moreover any connected graph of size at most hat-R that arrows (K_m,K_n) is isomorphic to K_r, so for complete graphs the size version adds nothing and the subject belongs to generalized rather than classical Ramsey theory. Theorem 2 proves hat-r(K_{1,m},K_{1,n}) = m+n-1, whence the stars K_{1,n} form an o-sequence, answering the second preliminary question. Sections 3-7 pose Problem A (characterize the graphs G for which the star-operation sequences GKbar_n, G+Kbar_n, G(+)Kbar_n are o-sequences) and Problem B (the asymptotics of hat-r(K_mKbar_n), hat-r(K_{m,n}), hat-r(K_m+Kbar_n) and hat-r(K_m(+)Kbar_n)), and solve Problem A while giving upper and lower bounds for Problem B; the tools are a nested-neighborhood argument, a high-low coloring counterexample (Fact A), a binomial concentration estimate (Fact B), and the Guy-Znám Zarankiewicz lemma. Problem B asks the asymptotics of hat-r(K_{m,n}) with m fixed and n -> infinity; the diagonal question of Problem 560, whether {K_{n,n}} is an o-sequence, is posed separately in Section 8 (p. 160), where the paper notes that the Section 6 lower-bound arguments are not valid when m grows with n and records b_1 n^2 2^{n/2} <= hat-r(K_{n,n}) <= b_2 n^3 2^{n-1} (p. 161), the upper bound being Theorem 6 (p. 154: e^{-1} m 2^{m-1} n < hat-r(K_{m,n}) <= (28/9) m^2 2^{m-1} n for m >= 2 fixed and n large) applied at m = n. The paper's last paragraph (p. 161, page image) is the origin of Problem 720: after noting that r(P_n) = n + [n/2] - 1 and that K_{n,n} -> P_n, so that hat-r(P_n) <= n^2 < hat-R(P_n), it asks whether lim hat-r(P_n)/n exists and, if so, what its value is, and whether {P_n} is an o-sequence; the site's questions, whether hat-r(P_n)/n tends to infinity and hat-r(P_n)/n^2 to 0, are Erdős's later restatements in his problem papers, and the paper says nothing about cycles.

Source: https://users.renyi.hu/~p_erdos/1978-48.pdf.

Bears on. #560: the Section 8 question (p. 160) whether {K_{n,n}} is an o-sequence, with b_1 n^2 2^{n/2} <= hat-r(K_{n,n}) <= b_2 n^3 2^{n-1} (p. 161), the upper bound being Theorem 6 (p. 154) applied at m = n. #720: the p. 161 passage is the origin of the path question, asked there as whether lim hat-r(P_n)/n exists (and, if so, its value) and whether {P_n} is an o-sequence; the paper contains no question about cycles.

Results to transcribe.

  • Definition (p. 146): hat-r(G_1,G_2) = min |E(G)| over graphs G with G -> (G_1,G_2); with hat-R(G_1,G_2) = C(r(G_1,G_2),2), a sequence {G_n} is an o-sequence if hat-r(G_n) = o(hat-R(G_n)).
  • Theorem 1: For all m, n, hat-r(K_m,K_n) = hat-R(K_m,K_n); moreover any connected G of size at most hat-R with G -> (K_m,K_n) is isomorphic to K_r, where r = r(K_m,K_n).
  • Theorem 2: hat-r(K_{1,m},K_{1,n}) = m+n-1 for all m and n.
  • Corollary to Theorem 2: The stars {K_{1,n}} form an o-sequence: hat-r(K_{1,n})/hat-R(K_{1,n}) equals 1/(n-1) for n even and 1/n for n odd, hence tends to 0.
  • Problems A and B (p. 150): Problem A asks which G make {GKbar_n}, {G+Kbar_n}, {G(+)Kbar_n} o-sequences (solved in the paper); Problem B asks the asymptotics of hat-r(K_mKbar_n), hat-r(K_{m,n}), hat-r(K_m+Kbar_n), hat-r(K_m(+)Kbar_n), only bounded.
  • Fact A (p. 151): For |E| <= n^2/2 the high-low coloring of G with respect to n has E_1 bipartite, E_1 containing no two adjacent vertices of degree >= n, and E_2 containing no vertex of degree >= n; used as a general counterexample.
  • Theorem 6 (p. 154): Let m >= 2 be fixed and n sufficiently large; then e^{-1} m 2^{m-1} n < hat-r(K_{m,n}) <= (28/9) m^2 2^{m-1} n.
  • Section 8, Open questions (pp. 160-161): it is an open question whether {K_{n,n}} is an o-sequence; a straightforward probabilistic argument gives hat-r(K_{n,n}) >= b_1 n^2 2^{n/2}, and Theorem 6 gives b_1 n^2 2^{n/2} <= hat-r(K_{n,n}) <= b_2 n^3 2^{n-1}; the section also lists the bounds for the four Problem B families and closes (p. 161) with hat-r(P_n) <= n^2 < hat-R(P_n) and the questions whether lim hat-r(P_n)/n exists and whether {P_n} is an o-sequence, the origin of Problem 720.

No file of this source is held: no license on record permits its redistribution, and the card cites the edition it names above.